Warbird Information Exchange

DISCLAIMER: The views expressed on this site are the responsibility of the poster and do not reflect the views of the management.
It is currently Mon Jun 09, 2025 8:19 am

View unanswered posts | View active topics


Board index » General Discussion » The WIX Hangar

All times are UTC - 5 hours


Classic Wings Magazine WWII Naval Aviation Research Pacific Luftwaffe Resource Center
When Hollywood Ruled The Skies - Volumes 1 through 4 by Bruce Oriss


Post new topic Reply to topic  Page 1 of 1
  [ 8 posts ] 
  Previous topic | Next topic 
Author Message
wacoykc
 Post subject: DOUGLAS DC-4 PROTOTYPE
PostPosted: Thu Nov 27, 2008 11:01 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Sep 25, 2008 2:18 pm
Posts: 743
Location: OHIO
Neat photo but I think I read somewhere that alot of photos of this airplane were actually ground shots that were superimposed so that it looked like they were flying. This one is somewhat suspect to me...

Image

_________________
President National Waco Club
Curator for the Waco Historical Society Air Museum
Writer for VINTAGE AIRPLANE, SKYWAYS, BARNSTORMERS.COM EFLYER
Top
 Profile  
 
CAPFlyer
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Thu Nov 27, 2008 11:03 pm 
Offline
3000+ Post Club
3000+ Post Club
User avatar

Joined: Fri Mar 02, 2007 6:52 pm
Posts: 3413
Location: Wichita Falls, Texas, USA
Looks real to me. You can see the #2 engine on the other side spinning. Must be part of their 2-engine certification trials or a demonstration of its ability to operate on 2 engines.
Top
 Profile  
 
Steve Nelson
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Fri Nov 28, 2008 12:09 am 
Offline
3000+ Post Club
3000+ Post Club

Joined: Thu Dec 21, 2006 8:32 am
Posts: 4329
Location: Battle Creek, MI
Neat pic! That's actually the DC-4E...no relation to the slightly smaller and better-known DC-4/C-54/R5D. The DC-4E was underpowered and unsuccesful, and the sole porotype was sold to the Japanese in the late 30s. They eventually developed a bomber from the basic design (the Nakajima G5N Shinzan, Allied code-name "Liz.") The few built served as long-range transports.

SN

Image
Top
 Profile  
 
tom d. friedman
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Fri Nov 28, 2008 7:52 am 
Offline
Long Time Member
Long Time Member
User avatar

Joined: Sun Oct 10, 2004 4:43 pm
Posts: 7501
Location: northern ohio
steve........ good homework!!

_________________
tom d. friedman - hey!!! those fokkers were messerschmitts!! * without ammunition, the usaf would be just another flying club!!! * better to have piece of mind than piece of tail!!
Top
 Profile  
 
Michel Lemieux
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Fri Nov 28, 2008 4:39 pm 
Offline
2000+ Post Club
2000+ Post Club
User avatar

Joined: Fri Apr 30, 2004 8:11 am
Posts: 2391
Location: Montreal, Quebec, Canada
I posted a vid of it in flight at the BAse Theater

http://warbirdinformationexchange.org/phpBB2/viewtopic.php?t=19861&postdays=0&postorder=asc&start=60
Top
 Profile  
 
Glyn
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Fri Nov 28, 2008 6:06 pm 
Offline

Joined: Mon Feb 14, 2005 12:23 am
Posts: 321
With the 2 starboard motors dead I would expect to see a considerable deflection of the rudders to compensate.
Top
 Profile  
 
Airlift48
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Fri Nov 28, 2008 6:51 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sat Oct 29, 2005 7:01 pm
Posts: 742
The Japanese put out a story that it crashed in Tokyo Bay with a bunch of Japanese Naval Officers on it.

It was discovered later that it was the basis for their other planes.

This story is repeated in the beginning of the Douglas C-54/DC-4 Pilot's Traning Manual...

_________________
Kevin Kearney
Vice President
Berlin Airlift Historical Foundation


C-54D "Spirit of Freedom" 43-17228
C-97 "Angel of Deliverance" 52-2718 (painted as YC-97A 45-59595)
C-54E/R5D-4 "Spirit of Freedom" 44-9144 BuNo 90414 (wfu April/2020)
http://www.spiritoffreedom.org
Top
 Profile  
 
maxum96
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Fri Nov 28, 2008 11:32 pm 
Offline
1000+ Posts!
1000+ Posts!

Joined: Sun Dec 31, 2006 5:11 pm
Posts: 1111
Location: Outer Space
Glyn wrote:
With the 2 starboard motors dead I would expect to see a considerable deflection of the rudders to compensate.



Look closely, especially at the starboard rudder. The pilot is definitely imputing a lot of left rudder.

Image
Top
 Profile  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  Page 1 of 1
  [ 8 posts ] 

Board index » General Discussion » The WIX Hangar

All times are UTC - 5 hours


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Google [Bot], Google Adsense [Bot], Rod Schneider and 276 guests

You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  
Switch to mobile style
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group