EDowning wrote:
Deleting the post in order to protect the rep of any company, after the company has been identified in the post, is just plain stupid from a PR standpoint. My guess is that whatever was being referenced, was far less damaging than the speculation of what happened. My understanding was that Tim had responded with some details ( which I didn't get to read yet) and then the whole post was removed. Now we are left to speculate the worst. Bad Plan Moderator!
Hi Eric-
I think those that know me, and my reputation will feel welcome to contact me for any details, the good, the bad, or the ugly about anything any of my enterprises has been engaged in. I don't have anything to hide. I simply stated in my reply post that there are two sides to each and every business dispute or problem and asked the original poster to contact me for the details. He has declined to do so, which is certainly his perogative, and I consider the matter closed.
Anyone else who would like my perspective is also welcome to contact me, but I am not going to start a he-said, she-said on an internet message board. As we have discovered over and over here on WIX, it is easy to make a one-sided statement that one assumes or has been told is fact, without balance.
Thanks!