Warbird Information Exchange

DISCLAIMER: The views expressed on this site are the responsibility of the poster and do not reflect the views of the management.
It is currently Sun May 11, 2025 10:33 pm

All times are UTC - 5 hours


Classic Wings Magazine WWII Naval Aviation Research Pacific Luftwaffe Resource Center
When Hollywood Ruled The Skies - Volumes 1 through 4 by Bruce Oriss


Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 20 posts ]  Go to page 1, 2  Next
Author Message
 Post subject: B-29 FIFI for Gary
PostPosted: Mon Mar 10, 2008 8:44 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Mon May 03, 2004 7:11 am
Posts: 288
Location: Ohio
Image

Image

I shot these photos while visiting my Uncle in Grand Island, Neb. I want to say mid 1990's. I have been going thru alot of old photos, wish I would have had the camera I have now that I bought from D. Fisher.

Have Fun... 8)

_________________
FLY SAFE--FLY FAST
F4U Corsair Historian
Mint Moore III


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Tue Mar 11, 2008 12:52 am 
Offline
3000+ Post Club
3000+ Post Club
User avatar

Joined: Thu Sep 28, 2006 12:56 pm
Posts: 3442
Location: North of Texas, South of Kansas
Corsairboss, that pair of pictures fascinates me on a couple of levels.

I've spent many hours researching and exploring the Grand Island Army Air Field, and that first photo is very important to me from a historical viewpoint. The hangar behind FIFI was T-115, built during the airfield's second phase of construction. The hangar was designed to accomodate the new Very Heavy Bomber, the B-29, and there is a very good chance that FIFI actually spent time in that building. FIFI was assigned to Grand Island as a training aircraft from October of '45 until sent to Pyote for storage in December of '46. I've been looking for a 1940s picture of her at Grand Island or Salina for a long time, but this is almost as good.

Unfortunately, T-115 was lost in a fire on 14 May, 2002, started by sparks from construction on a new door.
Image
A small portion of Hangar T-113 can be seen to the left of T-115. T-113 is still in use, and is the last of four hangars built at Grand Island during the War. The original Grand Island Municipal Airport hangar is also still in good repair.

Thanks for posting a photo that ties up some loose ends for my research!
Scott


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Tue Mar 11, 2008 8:21 am 
Offline
Co-MVP - 2006
User avatar

Joined: Fri Nov 18, 2005 10:39 am
Posts: 4468
Location: Midland, TX Yee-haw.
Thanks for posting those pictures, corsairboss. Neat stuff.

That's sad about that hangar, Scott. Sucks to see such history get burned down.

Gary


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Tue Mar 11, 2008 9:36 am 
Offline
3000+ Post Club
3000+ Post Club
User avatar

Joined: Thu Sep 28, 2006 12:56 pm
Posts: 3442
Location: North of Texas, South of Kansas
Yes, having that hangar burn did stink, but what sucks even more is that three more just like it are going to be torn down because the towns running their respective airports no longer have a use for them. The two north hangars at Great Bend and the last Squadron hangar at Pratt are all going to be razed because there is no one with the means to save them. Great Bend had a wind storm a couple of years ago that damaged the roofs on their hangars, and the one at Pratt is dying of neglect. The "Battle of Kansas" was fought at these airfields, but few people seem to care to save these historic structures.

Here are the north three hangars at Great Bend in late '45. The hangar on the far right was the original hangar constructed in early '42. It is currently in use by the FBO on the field. The other two are to be destroyed.
Image

This photo is of the two north hangars, taken in August of 2006. This will soon be "valuable real estate". :cry:
Image


This photo of parading 40th Bomb Group personnel shows T-304 nearest the camera and T-307 in the background. T-307 burned down a number of years ago, leaving T-304 as the last Squadron hangar on the field.
Image

I took this photo of T-304 in March of 2006. Liability issues and a lack of funds will see this hangar disappear in the near future as well. No one wants a wooden hangar and the upkeep costs that go with it.
Image

I'm crawling off my soapbox now. Sorry I hijacked your thread just so I could vent, corsairboss.
Scott


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Tue Mar 11, 2008 9:41 am 
Offline
3000+ Post Club
3000+ Post Club
User avatar

Joined: Thu Mar 24, 2005 10:10 pm
Posts: 4173
Location: Pearland, Texas
Oh, to have access to a hangar like that in the Houston area. The WWII hangars at Ellington disappeared long ago.

_________________
"You cannot invade the mainland United States. There would be a rifle behind each blade of grass..."
Admiral Isoruku Yamamoto


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Tue Mar 11, 2008 9:55 am 
Offline
3000+ Post Club
3000+ Post Club
User avatar

Joined: Thu Sep 28, 2006 12:56 pm
Posts: 3442
Location: North of Texas, South of Kansas
Rick,

I agree, there are so many places that we could use those hangars, but the way they were built just makes it nearly impossible even if the funds were available. There are MANY yards of concrete in the buttresses and floor, and to disassemble and ship the roof trusses would be an enormous undertaking. I'm glad someone is at least interested in them, even if we'll soon be able to visit them only on film. :x

Scott


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Tue Mar 11, 2008 10:06 am 
Offline
2000+ Post Club
2000+ Post Club
User avatar

Joined: Tue Nov 15, 2005 6:23 pm
Posts: 2950
Location: Somewhere South of New Jersey...
Beautiful hangars. Theres something about the arched roof... It's a shame they can't be saved. Theres quite a few in that style on Air Force bases...

_________________
"Everyone wants to live here (New Jersey), evidenced by the fact that it has the highest population per capita in the U.S..."


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Tue Mar 11, 2008 1:00 pm 
Offline
2000+ Post Club
2000+ Post Club
User avatar

Joined: Sun Aug 13, 2006 7:11 pm
Posts: 2671
Location: Port Charlotte, Florida
I assume those vintage hangars are going to be torn down to make way for new development? If that's the case, perhaps they could be donated to a museum. It would take someone with deeeeeeeep pockets to finance the disassembly, transport, and erection at the new location, but it's possible. VFM's main hangar at FTW is a genuine WW2 USAAF hangar which came from (I believe) Pyote Army Air Field in West Texas. It was a B-29 maintenance hangar at Pyote, and could accommodate two of them. Having a WW2 hangar to house our WW2-themed museum really adds to the experience, in my humble-ish opinion.

If I'm wrong about the hangar's origins, someone please correct me. I'm a big boy and I can handle criticism (Lord knows I get plenty of it). :roll:

Cheers!

_________________
Dean Hemphill, K5DH
Port Charlotte, Florida


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Tue Mar 11, 2008 1:26 pm 
Offline
3000+ Post Club
3000+ Post Club
User avatar

Joined: Thu Sep 28, 2006 12:56 pm
Posts: 3442
Location: North of Texas, South of Kansas
Dean,

If VFM has a hangar from Pyote, it would have to be the Sub-Depot as it was the only one large enough for two B-29s. I knew that the Pyote Sub-Depot was dismantled some years ago, but had no idea where the materials went. Only the two sidewalls stand today. Here is a shot of Pyote taken after the war, the hangar we're referring to is the one directly behind the #2 engine on aircraft 540.
Image


To my knowledge, all three in Kansas are being razed because there isn't any money to repair or maintain them, and (supposedly) no one would insure any aircraft stored in them if they were used. These huge wooden structures are like a giant piano when you study the workmanship, but the cost to keep roofs on them is just prohibitive. I'll have some more information on this situation later, as it is the one area of the warbird field I really know anything about. :shock:

As far as the redevelopment at GBD and PTT, I think the Airport Authorities just want to be rid of the liability, both legal and fiscal. There is plenty of available real estate if anyone wanted it that wouldn't require the removal of these historic buildings. I think we're a few years too late to make good things happen, but we'll see.

Thanks for the interest from all of you, I thought there were just a couple of us that cared about the training airfields.
Scott


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Tue Mar 11, 2008 1:53 pm 
Offline
Senior Moderator
User avatar

Joined: Thu Jun 15, 2006 12:22 am
Posts: 3875
Location: DFW Texas
k5dh wrote:
VFM's main hangar at FTW is a genuine WW2 USAAF hangar which came from (I believe) Pyote Army Air Field in West Texas.


I heard it was a B-29 hanger but I never heard that is was moved from Pyote...interesting...

Image

_________________
Zane Adams
There I was at 20,000 ft, upside down and out of ammunition.
_______________________________________________________________________________
Join us for the Texas Warbird Report on WarbirdRadio.com!
Image http://www.facebook.com/WarbirdRadio
Listen at http://www.warbirdradio.com


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Tue Mar 11, 2008 1:59 pm 
Offline
2000+ Post Club
2000+ Post Club
User avatar

Joined: Sun Aug 13, 2006 7:11 pm
Posts: 2671
Location: Port Charlotte, Florida
Second Air Force wrote:
the hangar we're referring to is the one directly behind the #2 engine on aircraft 540.
Image


Hi Scott,

The hangar in your photo sure seems to be the right shape and size. Take a look at this shot of our main hangar:

Image

Whaddya think? Like I said in my original post, I'm not certain about the hangar's origins, but I've been told by several Museum members at various times that the hangar came from Pyote. Of course, they could all be repeating the same rumour. You know that after being repeated enough times, rumours become facts! :wink:

Cheers!

_________________
Dean Hemphill, K5DH
Port Charlotte, Florida


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Tue Mar 11, 2008 2:04 pm 
Offline
3000+ Post Club
3000+ Post Club
User avatar

Joined: Thu Mar 24, 2005 10:10 pm
Posts: 4173
Location: Pearland, Texas
That hangar had been there a long time prior to 1984. I had also heard that it was a B-29 hangar but don't know if it was moved there. The concrete work sure looks really old.

_________________
"You cannot invade the mainland United States. There would be a rifle behind each blade of grass..."
Admiral Isoruku Yamamoto


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Tue Mar 11, 2008 2:44 pm 
Offline
Senior Moderator
User avatar

Joined: Thu Jun 15, 2006 12:22 am
Posts: 3875
Location: DFW Texas
I know that hanger was there and old in 75...

_________________
Zane Adams
There I was at 20,000 ft, upside down and out of ammunition.
_______________________________________________________________________________
Join us for the Texas Warbird Report on WarbirdRadio.com!
Image http://www.facebook.com/WarbirdRadio
Listen at http://www.warbirdradio.com


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Tue Mar 11, 2008 4:40 pm 
Offline
2000+ Post Club
2000+ Post Club
User avatar

Joined: Sun Aug 13, 2006 7:11 pm
Posts: 2671
Location: Port Charlotte, Florida
Ztex wrote:
I know that hanger was there and old in 75...


Hmm... if that's the case, then the stories I've been told may not be true. As I said before, rumours that are told over and over eventually become accepted as facts. I tend to believe things that seem plausible and are told to me in the same way by multiple people at separate times. Obviously, that doesn't make them true! Next time I'm at the Museum, I'll ask Doc for the real story.

Dean the ever-inquisitive (and frequently wrong)


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Tue Mar 11, 2008 4:48 pm 
Offline
3000+ Post Club
3000+ Post Club
User avatar

Joined: Thu Sep 28, 2006 12:56 pm
Posts: 3442
Location: North of Texas, South of Kansas
The Sub-Depot at Pyote was dismantled in the last twenty or so years, so I'd guess the one at FTW may have come from Fort Worth AAF, or was it always at Meacham? Dean, check if the roof trusses are steel or wood the next time you're in there, that will tell us something about it's origins. I'll have to put my thinking cap on when I get home and see what I can discover.

Scott


Top
 Profile  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 20 posts ]  Go to page 1, 2  Next

All times are UTC - 5 hours


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Google [Bot], Noha307 and 309 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group