Warbird Information Exchange

DISCLAIMER: The views expressed on this site are the responsibility of the poster and do not reflect the views of the management.
It is currently Sat Jun 21, 2025 3:25 pm

All times are UTC - 5 hours


Classic Wings Magazine WWII Naval Aviation Research Pacific Luftwaffe Resource Center
When Hollywood Ruled The Skies - Volumes 1 through 4 by Bruce Oriss


Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 17 posts ]  Go to page 1, 2  Next
Author Message
PostPosted: Mon Jan 21, 2008 9:55 pm 
Offline
1000+ Posts!
1000+ Posts!

Joined: Fri Sep 24, 2004 10:11 pm
Posts: 1559
Location: Damascus, MD
I picked up a copy of Scott Thompson's "The Final Cut" and am enjoying it immensely (especially when cross-referencing it with Larry's great posts and pics). I do have a question...of the B-17s that are on display as static aircraft, how many of them are still airworthy, or could be airworthy with a little bit of work?


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Jan 22, 2008 8:31 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Jun 16, 2004 7:18 am
Posts: 671
Location: Berkshire, UK
SaxMan wrote:
I do have a question...of the B-17s that are on display as static aircraft, how many of them are still airworthy, or could be airworthy with a little bit of work?


Non are airworthy, they are static... :wink:

And I suspect very few, if any, could be airworthy with 'a little bit of work'.... :wink:

For a start, those on static prior to the 2001 FAA wing spar AD, would have to undergo this without taking into account anything else, and that's not a little bit of work.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Tue Jan 22, 2008 11:08 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Apr 06, 2006 11:23 am
Posts: 484
Location: maple ridge b.c. canada
the seattle mof BOEING BEE and the Evergreen aviations b-17 both come to mind. how about shoo shoo baby? i would think that there might be a couple more but opinions are like........


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Tue Jan 22, 2008 11:23 am 
Offline
3000+ Post Club
3000+ Post Club
User avatar

Joined: Tue May 04, 2004 8:54 am
Posts: 3331
Bob Pond's. :(


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Wed Jan 23, 2008 7:07 pm 
Offline

Joined: Sat Sep 30, 2006 2:15 pm
Posts: 241
Location: Midwest US
Remember that there is a difference between flyable and "non-flyable" storage.

Just because something is on display does not mean it is non-flyable. Static does not mean not airworthy.

Shoo shoo shoo baby is in long term flyable storage. She was delivered by air, hangered in a controled hanger and could be put back into operation (AD issues aside-besides this a/c is never gonna fly anyway)with a minimum of fuss.

Just my two cents.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: B-17
PostPosted: Wed Jan 23, 2008 7:48 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Tue Apr 24, 2007 9:48 am
Posts: 84
Location: Mile High Mecca
SAXMAN,
The B-17 in the hangar of the 390th BG Museum, Tucson, probably could be made flyable in very short order. "I'll Be Around" was flown into DM, towed over to the museum site, inside the hangar. The remaining wall was put up and there she sits. Even drip pans under the engine to catch an occasional drip.
Regards,
Hugh


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Wed Jan 23, 2008 9:43 pm 
Offline
2000+ Post Club
2000+ Post Club

Joined: Mon Jul 26, 2004 2:38 pm
Posts: 2662
Location: Nashville, Tennessee
Do you include the water bomber airplanes that were exchanged with the Air Force in the 1980's and were flown to their locations? They were "flyable until parked."


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Wed Jan 23, 2008 10:16 pm 
Offline
Newly minted Mustang Pilot
User avatar

Joined: Sun Nov 14, 2004 3:41 pm
Posts: 1441
Location: Everywhere
airworthy
909
Sentimental
Fuddy Duddy
Miss Angela
Chuckie
Belle
Yankee Lady
Thunderbird
Aluminum Overcast
Pink Lady
Sally B
Liberty Belle

Near Airworthy
Raiders
Evergreen

Restoration to Airworthy
Planes of Fame
Desert Rat
Urbana
Brooks 2nd B-17

Potential Airframes
Kermit Weeks Suzie Q
Gas Station Bomber

Any other potential airframes that could be restored quickly are under Air Force incarseration
Tulare
Castle

There are of course many other airframes out there that will never see air under thier wings no matter how much wishing we do.

Jim Harley


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Wed Jan 23, 2008 10:37 pm 
Offline

Joined: Sun Jun 20, 2004 9:20 pm
Posts: 860
Location: Lincoln, California
Of course, if the engines were not "pickled" properly, you are probably looking at some significant engine work for four R-1820s. We had a DC-3 that sat in a hangar for ten years. Pulled it out, did all the proper engine checks, ran 'em up, all that stuff. Both engines failed in the first few hours of trying to fly it, first one and then the others. Reputable engine guys (Basler) attributed it to the way the engines were (not) prepared for storage.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: 17
PostPosted: Thu Jan 24, 2008 8:55 am 
Offline
1000+ Posts!
1000+ Posts!
User avatar

Joined: Sat Oct 07, 2006 9:24 pm
Posts: 1748
Location: atlanta,georgia
Dont forget Swamp Ghost.She will cost a truckload of money to restore once she is out of png.If it were mine i would trade it to the airforce for one of the gate guard 17s of my choice.I would bet the AF would jump all over that.

_________________
Hang The Expense


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Thu Jan 24, 2008 10:27 am 
Offline

Joined: Fri May 21, 2004 11:31 am
Posts: 609
Location: A pool in Palm Springs
That makes sense. You recover Swamp Ghost, ship it to the USA. Have a combat loss B-17 that is one of the first B-17E models built and saw action in the South Pacific and you trade it for a roadside attraction B-17 with no combat history, all kinds of postwar USAF mods and a hundred coats of paint. So you restore your "G" and have to find something to do with it and the USAF puts the Ghost near a highway at a base in nebraska painted as "2nd Patches" and starts looking for a chin turret to make it "representative". Priceless.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Thu Jan 24, 2008 10:42 am 
Offline

Joined: Sun Jun 20, 2004 9:20 pm
Posts: 860
Location: Lincoln, California
Or you could spend $10 million restoring the B-17E. Only three times the money. Where's my checkbook?


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Thu Jan 24, 2008 4:46 pm 
Offline

Joined: Sun Oct 08, 2006 10:08 am
Posts: 153
Location: Ohio
As has been oft-repeated, Shoo-Shoo Baby flew into the NMUSAF. I'm sure she could be made airworthy again.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Thu Jan 24, 2008 5:35 pm 
Offline
Long Time Member
Long Time Member
User avatar

Joined: Sat Dec 02, 2006 9:10 am
Posts: 9720
Location: Pittsburgher misplaced in Oshkosh
Joe Scheil wrote:
That makes sense. You recover Swamp Ghost, ship it to the USA. Have a combat loss B-17 that is one of the first B-17E models built and saw action in the South Pacific and you trade it for a roadside attraction B-17 with no combat history, all kinds of postwar USAF mods and a hundred coats of paint. So you restore your "G" and have to find something to do with it and the USAF puts the Ghost near a highway at a base in nebraska painted as "2nd Patches" and starts looking for a chin turret to make it "representative". Priceless.


I am not sure that the NMUSAF would try and convert Swampghost into a B-17G. :? However there is a G model that has been made to look like an F model, but that one is flown.

_________________
Chris Henry
EAA Aviation Museum Manager


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: 17
PostPosted: Thu Jan 24, 2008 8:08 pm 
Offline
1000+ Posts!
1000+ Posts!
User avatar

Joined: Sat Oct 07, 2006 9:24 pm
Posts: 1748
Location: atlanta,georgia
Hey joe i would bet swamp ghost would go right in between the swoose and the Belle at AFM.What a coup for them.then take that ole ragged g model and convert it to an F model during the rebuild.That is what we are doing to Brooks second G model.One of the reasons for this is we will have to manufacture so much of the fuselage so we might as well make Miss Carry of the 390 BG.This was his dads first bomber and Liberty belle is the last his Dad flew on as crew.

_________________
Hang The Expense


Top
 Profile  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 17 posts ]  Go to page 1, 2  Next

All times are UTC - 5 hours


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 46 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group