Wed Nov 07, 2007 6:22 pm
Wed Nov 07, 2007 7:05 pm
Wed Nov 07, 2007 7:42 pm
Wed Nov 07, 2007 11:01 pm
daveymac82c wrote:Cool, thanks for the response.
I'd expect that airplanes less "front line" would have been used for training back home, but then, maybe these are tired airframes that have already seen the face of war and are back home training.
Like the Memphis Belle? Right?
Cheers,
David
Wed Nov 07, 2007 11:15 pm
Cool, thanks for the response.
I'd expect that airplanes less "front line" would have been used for training back home, but then, maybe these are tired airframes that have already seen the face of war and are back home training.
Like the Memphis Belle? Right?
Cheers,
Thu Nov 08, 2007 11:36 am
51fixer wrote:daveymac82c wrote:Cool, thanks for the response.
I'd expect that airplanes less "front line" would have been used for training back home, but then, maybe these are tired airframes that have already seen the face of war and are back home training.
Like the Memphis Belle? Right?
Cheers,
David
Many aircraft off the production line went straight to training outfits.
Stephen Grey's P-38 went from Burbank to OK City and was converted into a Photo Recon trainer ( It was built as a fighter, P-38J-5) and then used for that role. It was an early J model but lacked the leading edge fuel cells. It didn't have the aftercooler built into the leading edge and it didn't have fuel tanks either. Basiccally the leading edges didn't match what was in the books. We thought that the fuel cell production wasn't happening fast enough so they built some plain leading edges to fit and they could replace them later if it was desired. That is probably why that one went into a training role.
Another reason many went straight to training is that a more advanced varient or design was about to be made or was also in production.
I Don't think it was the norm for combat and war weary a/c to be brought back for training.
Rich