Warbird Information Exchange

DISCLAIMER: The views expressed on this site are the responsibility of the poster and do not reflect the views of the management.
It is currently Tue Apr 28, 2026 4:05 pm

All times are UTC - 5 hours


Classic Wings Magazine WWII Naval Aviation Research Pacific Luftwaffe Resource Center
When Hollywood Ruled The Skies - Volumes 1 through 4 by Bruce Oriss


Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 36 posts ]  Go to page 1, 2, 3  Next
Author Message
PostPosted: Tue Oct 16, 2007 5:22 am 
Offline
3000+ Post Club
3000+ Post Club
User avatar

Joined: Fri Apr 30, 2004 11:44 am
Posts: 3293
Location: Las Vegas, NV
I'll preface this by saying that I realize that since it's not my toy and not my checkbook operating it, it is no business of mine...

But...

As a Mustang enthusiast, "Polar Bear" has always annoyed me. It is by registration a "P-51A", and shown at airshows as such. However, it's as much P-51D as it is P-51A, being a built-up hybrid of the fuse of 44-73483, the wing of an Indonesian D model, and the wreck of 43-6006.

So, my thought since seeing Gerry Beck's "homebuilt" A model has been to get Polar Bear into the shop up at Tri State and into the P-51A jigs. Rebuild out all the P-51D parts and get her back into legitimate P-51A condition (similar to the "purification" rebuild of P-51C 43-25147/Princess Elizabeth, which was also a bastardized rebuild with P-51D parts).

This would make her a "pure" P-51A, and the Mustang world would be just a little more "right" for it having been done.

If only I could whip out my own checkbook and make it so...


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Tue Oct 16, 2007 9:24 am 
Offline

Joined: Fri Apr 30, 2004 11:52 am
Posts: 775
Location: Arizona
Fantastic idea, and there would be enough "left over" stuff to probably get another D model flying!


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Tue Oct 16, 2007 12:15 pm 
Offline
1000+ Posts!
1000+ Posts!

Joined: Mon May 03, 2004 3:07 am
Posts: 1059
Location: Whittier CA USA, 25 miles east of Los Angeles
It doesn't bother me anymore, and Polar Bear is a neat airplane. But I do remember a similar annoyance when I read of the rebuild in Warbirds Intl and learning it wasn't really a rebuild at all, but more of a new build from a D model.

John


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Tue Oct 16, 2007 1:52 pm 
Offline
3000+ Post Club
3000+ Post Club
User avatar

Joined: Sun Nov 27, 2005 10:51 pm
Posts: 4674
Location: Cheshire, CT
Actually, the only thing "Polar Bear" needs... is to be in MY HANGER!
I'll worry about the authenticity later!!! :lol: :lol:
Jerry

_________________
"Always remember that, when you enter the ocean or the forest, you are no longer at the top of the food chain."


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Tue Oct 16, 2007 3:02 pm 
Offline

Joined: Fri Apr 30, 2004 11:52 am
Posts: 775
Location: Arizona
JohnH wrote:
It doesn't bother me anymore, and Polar Bear is a neat airplane. But I do remember a similar annoyance when I read of the rebuild in Warbirds Intl and learning it wasn't really a rebuild at all, but more of a new build from a D model.
John


I can't say it annoyed me but I've always wondered why they bothered to drag all the wreckage off of the mountain when all they needed was the data plate! It's an interesting airplane, though I must admit that it looks a bit odd to my eye.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Tue Oct 16, 2007 3:49 pm 
Offline
1000+ Posts!
1000+ Posts!
User avatar

Joined: Sun Dec 03, 2006 7:43 pm
Posts: 1454
Location: Colorado
Quote:
As a Mustang enthusiast, "Polar Bear" has always annoyed me.


As a P-51 un-enthusiast I could care less. In a perfect world it would be nice to see every aircraft accurately restored, accurately marked, painted etc. For now I am just happy it is flown fairly regularly and Gerry Gabe usually asks for very little to come to an event and even buys his own hot dogs. Randy as you mentioned it isn't cheap to get into one of these aircraft these days and I'm not sure that Gerry is one of those guys sitting on a million or so to tear apart his already flying and cool P-51 just to make the knit pickers happy so you better double up on your lottery tickets. :lol:


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Tue Oct 16, 2007 7:18 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Tue May 04, 2004 6:56 am
Posts: 54
Location: Iowa
Randy,

As we speak Tri-state is building the rib tooling for A/B/C wings to complete the Red Tail rebuild. The stringers are at different locations than the -D and we need the ribs so Brent at Odegaard Wings can finish the -C model wing. I don't know what wing is on the Polar Bear, but I am guessing it would be a -D model.

The point is, to be a real -A would require a new wing as well.

_________________
Tailwinds,
Doug Rozendaal


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Tue Oct 16, 2007 7:36 pm 
Offline
Long Time Member
Long Time Member
User avatar

Joined: Wed Jan 24, 2007 1:54 am
Posts: 5237
Location: Stratford, CT.
For that matter if Gerry Beck's A-model is restored, then maybe a joint project could be undertaken at the same time on both aircraft, back to make them fully functional A model Mustangs (Personally my favorite. You'll find my love for this fighter starts at the beginning of the alphabet and works it way down. :wink:

Don't forget the razorbacks! I would love to see more of them in the air!

_________________
Keep Em' Flying,
Christopher Soltis

Dedicated to the preservation and education of The Sikorsky Memorial Airport

CASC Blog Page: http://ctair-space.blogspot.com/
Warbird Wear: https://www.redbubble.com/people/warbirdwear/shop

Chicks Dig Warbirds.......right?


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: un
PostPosted: Tue Oct 16, 2007 7:53 pm 
Offline
Probationary Member

Joined: Wed Jun 21, 2006 7:53 pm
Posts: 3803
Location: Aspen, CO
Ryan, I have never before heard of a P-51 "un-enthusiast". You aren't by chance ex Luftwaffe are you?

_________________
Bill Greenwood
Spitfire N308WK


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Tue Oct 16, 2007 9:41 pm 
Offline
1000+ Posts!
1000+ Posts!
User avatar

Joined: Sun Dec 03, 2006 7:43 pm
Posts: 1454
Location: Colorado
Quote:
Ryan, I have never before heard of a P-51 "un-enthusiast". You aren't by chance ex Luftwaffe are you?


LOL Bill, I'm not sure what happened to me as a child but for some reason I have just never been a huge fan of fighter aircraft. Perhaps it was my traumatic upbringing by a family of B-25s, I'm not sure. I have always been much more interested in the details that go into bomber aircraft such as the turrets, crew station details, radio equipment etc. I can appreciate all that goes into these aircraft and not to say that I dislike them just my interests lie more in the area of medium and heavy bombers.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Wed Oct 17, 2007 1:14 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sun Aug 05, 2007 10:36 pm
Posts: 702
Location: Wherever I happen to be.
The biggest problem would be convincing Jerry to take his nicely flying aircraft, rip it apart, and then sink a ton of money into it again, to make, a nicely flying aircraft. I’ve spent some time with him before and I just don’t think he’s the type to do that.

_________________
Curtis Block

I've seen too many airplanes destroyed by the term "Static Restoration."


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Wed Oct 17, 2007 1:18 am 
Offline
3000+ Post Club
3000+ Post Club
User avatar

Joined: Fri Apr 30, 2004 11:44 am
Posts: 3293
Location: Las Vegas, NV
Curtis Block wrote:
The biggest problem would be convincing Jerry to take his nicely flying aircraft, rip it apart, and then sink a ton of money into it again, to make, a nicely flying aircraft. I’ve spent some time with him before and I just don’t think he’s the type to do that.


Well, obviously. There is no reason a rational person would do such a thing, which is why I put the suggestion in the context of "If I could afford to do it...."


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Wed Oct 17, 2007 1:20 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sun Aug 05, 2007 10:36 pm
Posts: 702
Location: Wherever I happen to be.
Roger that. :lol:

_________________
Curtis Block

I've seen too many airplanes destroyed by the term "Static Restoration."


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Wed Oct 17, 2007 1:21 am 
Offline
Long Time Member
Long Time Member
User avatar

Joined: Tue May 11, 2004 5:42 pm
Posts: 6884
Location: The Goldfields, Victoria, Australia
Randy Haskin wrote:
Well, obviously. There is no reason a rational person would do such a thing, which is why I put the suggestion in the context of "If I could afford to do it...."

My name is Randy,, and I want to be rich and insane. ?!?

(Sorry, 'irrational'.) :D

_________________
James K

"Switch on the underwater landing lights"
Emilio Largo, Thunderball.

www.VintageAeroWriter.com


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Wed Oct 17, 2007 3:26 am 
Offline
3000+ Post Club
3000+ Post Club
User avatar

Joined: Fri Apr 30, 2004 11:44 am
Posts: 3293
Location: Las Vegas, NV
JDK wrote:
My name is Randy,, and I want to be rich and insane. ?!?


I thought those two things went hand-in-hand?

Besides...nothing is too insane or irrational for an anorak.


Top
 Profile  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 36 posts ]  Go to page 1, 2, 3  Next

All times are UTC - 5 hours


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Google [Bot], tulsaboy and 172 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group