Warbird Information Exchange

DISCLAIMER: The views expressed on this site are the responsibility of the poster and do not reflect the views of the management.
It is currently Sat May 10, 2025 6:38 pm

All times are UTC - 5 hours


Classic Wings Magazine WWII Naval Aviation Research Pacific Luftwaffe Resource Center
When Hollywood Ruled The Skies - Volumes 1 through 4 by Bruce Oriss


Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 25 posts ]  Go to page 1, 2  Next
Author Message
PostPosted: Sun Jun 22, 2008 4:10 pm 
Offline
2000+ Post Club
2000+ Post Club
User avatar

Joined: Sat Nov 25, 2006 9:18 pm
Posts: 2275
Location: Vancouver, BC
Hi everyone,

here's a question that is kind of silly, but can be very interesting as long is it doesn't turn into a heated debate.

My question is:

If during WWII the aircraft used by the allies had been switched with that of the axis, how would you have expected the outcome of the war to change?

What I mean is, what if the Luftwaffe and Japanese operated Lancasters, Spits, Mustangs, B-17's, p-38's, etc and the RAF/USAAF/etc. operated HE-111's, FW-190's, Zero's, Vals, Kate's ME-109's.

And for more detail, we'll assume that the technology would have adapted at the exact same rate as it did in the real world.

Give reasons to back up your responses, too.

Cheers,

David


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Sun Jun 22, 2008 4:36 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sat Dec 08, 2007 11:05 pm
Posts: 656
If you gave them all our Corsairs were done, if it was one for one.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Sun Jun 22, 2008 4:37 pm 
Offline
3000+ Post Club
3000+ Post Club

Joined: Mon May 03, 2004 1:05 am
Posts: 3236
Davey,

I don't believe it is just a matter of switching aircraft.

The sheer number of aircraf produced by the Allies, plus the training program, that's what brought the Germans down. In addition, you must remember that internal politics within the German High Command and the Luftwaffe, dictated that many promising projects, would be sidelined or mis-used.

Case in hand, the use of the Me-262 as a bomber, when as a fighter it would have had much more impact.

So, if it is just simply switching aircraft, but the other factors (tactics, strategy, production, etc.) remained the same, I think that the outcome would have been the same.

Saludos,


Tulio

_________________
Why take the best part of life out of your life, when you can have life with the best part of your life in your life?

I am one of them 'futbol' people.

Will the previous owner has pics of this double cabin sample

GOOD MORNING, WELCOME TO THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Press "1" for English.
Press "2" to disconnect until you have learned to speak English.


Sooooo, how am I going to know to press 1 or 2, if I do not speak English????


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Sun Jun 22, 2008 5:46 pm 
Offline
1000+ Posts!
1000+ Posts!
User avatar

Joined: Thu Mar 20, 2008 5:04 am
Posts: 1179
Location: Merchantville, NJ
Just to throw an absurd side note of humor in here, I heard an amusing little commentary yesterday, based on an illustration on a reenactors site...

Do you know the REAL reason the Allies won the war?
Because SCISSORS(V for Victory, Churchill gesture) beats PAPER(Hitler's "Heil" outstretched arm salute)...

Told ya it was absurd. But you laughed, didn't ya?

Robbie


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Sun Jun 22, 2008 5:59 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sat Dec 08, 2007 11:05 pm
Posts: 656
l did only when you asked :lol:


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Sun Jun 22, 2008 6:00 pm 
Offline

Joined: Fri Oct 07, 2005 9:41 am
Posts: 540
And what about ROCK?! :)


Robbie Roberts wrote:
Just to throw an absurd side note of humor in here, I heard an amusing little commentary yesterday, based on an illustration on a reenactors site...

Do you know the REAL reason the Allies won the war?
Because SCISSORS(V for Victory, Churchill gesture) beats PAPER(Hitler's "Heil" outstretched arm salute)...

Told ya it was absurd. But you laughed, didn't ya?

Robbie


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Sun Jun 22, 2008 6:04 pm 
Offline
1000+ Posts!
1000+ Posts!
User avatar

Joined: Thu Mar 20, 2008 5:04 am
Posts: 1179
Location: Merchantville, NJ
I think "Rock" was Il Duce, and he was wrapped by Paper!


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Sun Jun 22, 2008 8:27 pm 
Offline
Been here a long time
Been here a long time

Joined: Sun May 02, 2004 1:16 am
Posts: 11319
Now you asked for it... :wink:

http://cosmos.bcst.yahoo.com/up/player/popup/index.php?cl=8432301


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Sun Jun 22, 2008 8:49 pm 
Offline
1000+ Posts!
1000+ Posts!
User avatar

Joined: Thu Mar 20, 2008 5:04 am
Posts: 1179
Location: Merchantville, NJ
I heard about that... lol...
Robbie


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: ???
PostPosted: Sun Jun 22, 2008 8:59 pm 
Offline
Co-MVP - 2006
User avatar

Joined: Sat May 01, 2004 11:21 pm
Posts: 11471
Location: Salem, Oregon
Quote:
Do you know the REAL reason the Allies won the war?
Because SCISSORS(V for Victory, Churchill gesture) beats PAPER(Hitler's "Heil" outstretched arm salute)...

:shock: 8) 8) 8) :prayer: :prayer: :prayer: :prayer:

_________________
Don't touch my junk!!


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Mon Jun 23, 2008 8:09 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Tue Jun 28, 2005 8:45 am
Posts: 518
It could have made a difference:

If the Germans had P-51's during the Battle of Britain, they would have had all the range the 109 lacked and the bombers would have been escorted everywhere. Plus the Spits and Hurricanes would have been outperformed.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: ????
PostPosted: Mon Jun 23, 2008 8:18 am 
Offline
Co-MVP - 2006
User avatar

Joined: Sat May 01, 2004 11:21 pm
Posts: 11471
Location: Salem, Oregon
Yeah, but the Brits would have flown FW-190s, Georges, Franks & Jacks :idea:

_________________
Don't touch my junk!!


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Tue Jun 24, 2008 2:06 am 
Offline
3000+ Post Club
3000+ Post Club

Joined: Mon May 03, 2004 1:05 am
Posts: 3236
Saville wrote:
It could have made a difference:

If the Germans had P-51's during the Battle of Britain, they would have had all the range the 109 lacked and the bombers would have been escorted everywhere. Plus the Spits and Hurricanes would have been outperformed.


I believe that in order to "accept" the swap of aircraft, timelines should also be kept, and thus, the Germans could not have had Mustangs during the Battle of Britain, since they had not yet entered full squadron service anywhere...

Saludos,


Tulio

_________________
Why take the best part of life out of your life, when you can have life with the best part of your life in your life?

I am one of them 'futbol' people.

Will the previous owner has pics of this double cabin sample

GOOD MORNING, WELCOME TO THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Press "1" for English.
Press "2" to disconnect until you have learned to speak English.


Sooooo, how am I going to know to press 1 or 2, if I do not speak English????


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Tue Jun 24, 2008 2:39 am 
Offline
Potato
User avatar

Joined: Thu May 06, 2004 3:21 am
Posts: 1068
Location: Out of the loop
I'm with Tulio,

Production kills. Ask the Soviets about that one. Not very much talent, and facing superior aircraft even at 50 to 1, they still win. And, the allies didn't have some of the corporal general leader dudes with wierd tactical/strategic weapon biases and super messed up service rivalrys.

Lanc's, B17's, ect, mean bumpkus if you ain't bombing the place the Soviets moved their stuff to east of the mountains. They're not very good tactical weapons.

An interesting thought is swarms of 262's and D-9's going wild over the continent.

_________________
DEEP THOUGHTS BY KIDS:
"If we could just get everyone to close their eyes and visualize world peace for an hour, imagine how serene and quiet it would be until the looting started. Age 15 "


Deep Thoughts,
Jack Handy


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Tue Jun 24, 2008 8:20 am 
Offline

Joined: Tue Jan 23, 2007 3:36 pm
Posts: 496
Location: "Fly Over Country" St. Louis, Missouri
Interesting image - Me262s with long range drop tanks...

Problem is there's no German long range bombers to work with though some of the late model Ju-88/188/288/388s might have been useful.
The Fw200, He177 and Me264 pretty well aren't worth the metal they were made of if used in a strategic bombing campaign.

Enjoy the Day! Mark


Top
 Profile  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 25 posts ]  Go to page 1, 2  Next

All times are UTC - 5 hours


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 250 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group