Warbird Information Exchange

DISCLAIMER: The views expressed on this site are the responsibility of the poster and do not reflect the views of the management.
It is currently Thu Mar 26, 2026 11:38 pm

All times are UTC - 5 hours


Classic Wings Magazine WWII Naval Aviation Research Pacific Luftwaffe Resource Center
When Hollywood Ruled The Skies - Volumes 1 through 4 by Bruce Oriss


Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 33 posts ]  Go to page 1, 2, 3  Next
Author Message
PostPosted: Thu Aug 16, 2007 11:30 am 
Offline
1000+ Posts!
1000+ Posts!
User avatar

Joined: Tue Jan 25, 2005 11:36 am
Posts: 1202
A Special Forces guy wrote this about the Air Force:


So we are up in the mountains at about 0100 hrs looking for a bad guy that we thought was in the area. Here are ten of us, pitch black, crystal clear night, about 25 degrees. We know there are bad guys in the area; a few shots have been fired but no big deal. We decide that we need air cover and the only thing in the area is a solo B-1 bomber. He flies around at about 20,000 feet and tells us there is nothing in the area. He then asks if we would like a low level show of force.


Stupid question. Of course we tell him yes.

The controller who is attached to the team then is heard talking to the pilot. Pilot asks if we want it subsonic or supersonic.

Very stupid question.

Pilot advises he is twenty miles out and stand by. The controller gets us all sitting down in a line and points out the proper location.

You have to picture this. Pitch black, ten killers sitting down,dead quiet and overlooking this about 30 mile long valley. All of a sudden, way out (below our level) you see a set of four 200' white flames coming at us.

The controller says, "Ah-- guys-- you might want to plug your ears".

Faster than you can think a B-1, supersonic, 1000' over our heads, blasts the sound barrier and it feels like God just hit you in the head with ahammer". He then stands it straight up with 4 white trails of flame coming out and disappears."

Cost of gas for that: Probably $50,000

Hearing damage: For certain

Bunch of Taliban thinking twice about shooting at us: Priceless


Pretty cool

Mark H


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Thu Aug 16, 2007 11:38 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri Dec 16, 2005 2:00 pm
Posts: 556
Location: East Texas
Uhmmmm correct me if I'm wrong, but I thought that the B-1B could not fly supersonic. The B-1A could, but not the B.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Thu Aug 16, 2007 11:45 am 
Offline
No Longer Active - per request

Joined: Mon Aug 29, 2005 1:40 pm
Posts: 1493
Cool story Mike 8) ...I can just picture the sh*t-eating grins on those SF guys. Talk about a morale booster! :wink:

John


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Thu Aug 16, 2007 11:48 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sat Mar 31, 2007 6:35 pm
Posts: 719
Location: Johnson City, TN
I had heard that the B-1 (don't know which version) was the fastest
a/c at low level (on the deck) today. Can anyone confirm this?

Steve G


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Thu Aug 16, 2007 12:08 pm 
Offline
Senior Moderator
User avatar

Joined: Thu Jun 15, 2006 12:22 am
Posts: 3875
Location: DFW Texas
That would have been a sight to see!

Quote:
B1-B
Speed: 900-plus mph (Mach 1.2 at sea level)


This from the USAF Fact Sheet...sounds fast to me.

:lol:

_________________
Zane Adams
There I was at 20,000 ft, upside down and out of ammunition.
_______________________________________________________________________________
Join us for the Texas Warbird Report on WarbirdRadio.com!
Image http://www.facebook.com/WarbirdRadio
Listen at http://www.warbirdradio.com


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Thu Aug 16, 2007 12:29 pm 
Offline
2000+ Post Club
2000+ Post Club
User avatar

Joined: Tue Nov 15, 2005 6:23 pm
Posts: 2997
Location: Somewhere South of New Jersey...
What do you mean, "not a warbird - yet"? I think it's a warbird, bigtime...

_________________
"Everyone wants to live here (New Jersey), evidenced by the fact that it has the highest population per capita in the U.S..."


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Thu Aug 16, 2007 12:59 pm 
Offline
1000+ Posts!
1000+ Posts!
User avatar

Joined: Tue Jan 25, 2005 11:36 am
Posts: 1202
I was thinking about that when I posted it. To me a WARBIRD is an airplane that is retired from military service and in the hands of civilisns, who may want to make it fly again.

So I look at it as a future warbird. Of course when the US GOVT retires them, they'll never fly again (kind of liek the B-47/B-36 I'd love to see fly)

At OSH a few years back, a pair of B-1s made 2 formation passes everyday at about 12:45. The first pass was slow, maybe 300KTS. The second pass was faster at about MACH .9999. The ground shook, everyone looked at them, it was a fearsome sight demanding (not just asking for) your respect.

Glad they are on our side................

Mark H


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Thu Aug 16, 2007 1:12 pm 
Offline
No Longer Active - per request

Joined: Mon Aug 29, 2005 1:40 pm
Posts: 1493
Deleted


Last edited by Former Member on Wed Aug 29, 2007 9:00 pm, edited 1 time in total.

Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Thu Aug 16, 2007 1:17 pm 
Offline
1000+ Posts!
1000+ Posts!

Joined: Sun Apr 03, 2005 11:06 pm
Posts: 1757
When I was stationed at Nellis, B-1's went supersonic all the time out there.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Thu Aug 16, 2007 1:57 pm 
Offline
3000+ Post Club
3000+ Post Club
User avatar

Joined: Fri Mar 02, 2007 6:52 pm
Posts: 3418
Location: Wichita Falls, Texas, USA
For years the USAF denied (with a vengeance) that the B-1B was subsonic at anything but extremely high altitudes (like 40,000+) much like they denied that the B-1B was also fully aerobatic. Now, however, as the airplane is not the "#1" aircraft on the line anymore, they're admitting a bit more of it's true performance and capabilities. I think anyone with a passion for the B-1B has known for years that it can do a lot more.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Thu Aug 16, 2007 2:16 pm 
Offline
1000+ Posts!
1000+ Posts!
User avatar

Joined: Thu Apr 28, 2005 10:01 am
Posts: 1126
Location: Post-Confederate People's Republic of Alabamastan, Suh!
When LGen Steve Croker, a former fighter guy who got 2 victories sitting behind Robin Olds in SEA, retired at Barksdale as the 8AF/CC (mid-90s or so), he spent a while doing Immelmans ... uh, *cough*, I mean Chandelles, in a Bone they flew in from Dyess - GEEZUSKEERIST it was loud!

As the BUF guys said, the display was pretty good ... you couldn't see the strings holding up the Bone or anything ... heh heh :shock:

Wade

_________________
Website: http://www.wademeyersart.com
Facebook: http://www.facebook.com/Wade.Meyers.Studios

Image


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Thu Aug 16, 2007 2:52 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri Dec 16, 2005 2:00 pm
Posts: 556
Location: East Texas
Have the engines been upgraded over the years to more powerful units that enable it to go supersonic now? Back when I was in the Air Force all the information available at the time said that after Reagan had restarted the program, the need for the supersonic penetration was no longer needed do to the current ALCM's at the time. Because of that the redesigned B-1B was smaller, had a smaller radar signature, and was subsonic.

But I wouldn't be suprised if that was just a cover story to mask the true capability of the B-1B


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Thu Aug 16, 2007 3:53 pm 
Offline
3000+ Post Club
3000+ Post Club
User avatar

Joined: Fri Mar 02, 2007 6:52 pm
Posts: 3418
Location: Wichita Falls, Texas, USA
No upgrades have been done. The aircraft is the same size as the B-1A as well. The only real change between the B-1A and B-1B was the addition of ejection seats instead of the capsule and deletion of the variable angle inlet guide vanes within the inlet. The second modification was because the B-1A was intended to be capable of high transonic (Mach 1.8+) speeds at low level. The B-1B is only capable of about Mach 1.2-1.3 at low level, so these guide vanes weren't required anymore, so they were eliminated and thus there was a weight and complexity savings gained.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Fri Aug 17, 2007 5:26 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Jun 16, 2004 7:18 am
Posts: 671
Location: Berkshire, UK
bipe215 wrote:
I had heard that the B-1 (don't know which version) was the fastest
a/c at low level (on the deck) today. Can anyone confirm this?

Steve G


It'd be a fun to see a 'face-off' with an RAF Tornado GR4, as on quoted sea-level Mach numbers the two seem pretty evenly matched...... :D


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Fri Aug 17, 2007 6:33 am 
Offline
3000+ Post Club
3000+ Post Club
User avatar

Joined: Fri Mar 02, 2007 6:52 pm
Posts: 3418
Location: Wichita Falls, Texas, USA
B-1B will always win. Tornado doesn't have enough fuel. The B-1B can sustain afterburner flight for over an hour. The Tornado would be empty in minutes.

One of the comparisons I heard from a Bone crewman was that under most circumstances, the B-1B's tailpipes will melt before you run out of fuel.


Top
 Profile  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 33 posts ]  Go to page 1, 2, 3  Next

All times are UTC - 5 hours


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 114 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group