Warbird Information Exchange

DISCLAIMER: The views expressed on this site are the responsibility of the poster and do not reflect the views of the management.
It is currently Mon Apr 20, 2026 10:32 pm

All times are UTC - 5 hours


Classic Wings Magazine WWII Naval Aviation Research Pacific Luftwaffe Resource Center
When Hollywood Ruled The Skies - Volumes 1 through 4 by Bruce Oriss


Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 14 posts ] 
Author Message
 Post subject: Movie "AIR FORCE" B-17B
PostPosted: Thu Jul 26, 2007 6:06 pm 
Just watched the 1943 movie "Air Force" on TCM the other night with John Garfield, I used to watch this movie on Saturday mornings when I was a child ... great fun. Howard Hawks the director was a close friend with Hap Arnold, so Hawks got all kinds of good support and good stuff from the USAAF. See the great footage of P-39's and a B-18 bolo in the background of one shot.

Questions? ... the narrator stated at the end of the movie that the B-17D "Mary-Ann" went to war right after the movie was completed and that she was destroyed in combat ... could this be true?

Were there B-17D's in combat service after 1943? I know "swoose" was out there, but I don't believe any D's were flying bombing missions at that time. Later models were in service by Dec. 1941.

Any good feedback by you heavy's?

Mark (just call me "Hellcat")

Image


Last edited by Hellcat on Thu Jul 26, 2007 6:49 pm, edited 1 time in total.

Top
  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Thu Jul 26, 2007 6:15 pm 
Offline
3000+ Post Club
3000+ Post Club

Joined: Fri Jun 24, 2005 7:26 pm
Posts: 4974
Location: PA
I love this movie. It is my favorite. My favorite time period and love the shots of the men running during the air raid at Clark. Lt. Raider, "LET'S GET THIS THING OUTTA HERE!". :D

_________________
Shop the Airplane Bunker At
www.warbirdbunker.com


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Thu Jul 26, 2007 6:22 pm 
Offline
1000+ Posts!
1000+ Posts!
User avatar

Joined: Thu Jan 12, 2006 6:37 pm
Posts: 1812
Location: Spring, TEXAS
Thats one movie I cant believe I havent seen! :?

_________________
Never drive faster than your Guardian Angel can fly!!

http://www.390th.org/
www.LSFM.org

Trae


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Thu Jul 26, 2007 6:24 pm 
Offline

Joined: Sun Jun 20, 2004 9:20 pm
Posts: 863
Location: Lincoln, California
It actually wasn't a B-17D but a B-17B. Check out the discussion here:

http://aerovintage.com/forum/viewtopic.php?t=170

and then look at this for some more discussion:

http://www.aerovintage.com/airforce.htm.

Though the B-17B Mary Ann remains unidentified, there are some clues. At least three other of the B-17s used in Air Force were B-17Bs with fuselages upgraded to B-17D specs. Apparently the Air Corps had Boeing or someone else rework the airplanes to upgrade them, something that is generally missing in the volumes of material written on the B-17.

There is just about zero chance, or maybe less, that any of the B-17s that appeared in Air Force subsequently saw combat.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Thu Jul 26, 2007 6:34 pm 
Offline
3000+ Post Club
3000+ Post Club

Joined: Fri Jun 24, 2005 7:26 pm
Posts: 4974
Location: PA
Im pretty sure it was a B-17C. The movie plane did not have cowlings so it is not a D. Are you sure its a B? I thought B models had bubble side blisters. Not smooth?

_________________
Shop the Airplane Bunker At
www.warbirdbunker.com


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Thu Jul 26, 2007 6:41 pm 
Now that's good stuff .... I wonder where the narrator got his information about the "Mary-Ann" going off to war. Seems that TCM, over any other station, would get their facts straight before stating them to the masses.

Course, the way the media has been lately? ..... lolol ....


Top
  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Thu Jul 26, 2007 6:44 pm 
Offline

Joined: Sun Jun 20, 2004 9:20 pm
Posts: 863
Location: Lincoln, California
Well, like I said, Boeing or someone else refitted the fuselages, or at least the armament, to a D configuration, or maybe a C configuration. The armament was pretty similar between a C and a D. The bubble just aft of the cockpit, for the mission commander, is offset on the B but not on the D, and it can be seen in the film that the Mary Ann and several of the others had offset bubbles. The main clues for the "B" ancestry are the oil coolers on the nacelles and the cowling configuration. And, as you noted, no cowl flaps which would, in fact, be the case if the wings and engines were not refitted as the armament apparently was. More research is needed on this whole little topic, but a close look at the photos proves pretty conclusive.

We have folks who have traced the rivet patterns of the skin panels for the Mary Ann vs. the standard B-17D and there is definitely signs that the waist windows were modified on the former.

Interesting stuff to about 0.000001% of the population, but that's us.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Thu Jul 26, 2007 7:05 pm 
Offline
3000+ Post Club
3000+ Post Club
User avatar

Joined: Thu Mar 24, 2005 10:10 pm
Posts: 4173
Location: Pearland, Texas
Quote:
We have folks who have traced the rivet patterns of the skin panels for the Mary Ann vs. the standard B-17D and there is definitely signs that the waist windows were modified on the former.


Now THERE'S someone with way to much time on their hands !! :lol:


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: B model 17
PostPosted: Thu Jul 26, 2007 7:33 pm 
Offline
1000+ Posts!
1000+ Posts!
User avatar

Joined: Sat Oct 07, 2006 9:24 pm
Posts: 1748
Location: atlanta,georgia
Hey, easy there.Its what we do for a living. A ton of research went into finding what plane it actually was. :oops:

_________________
Hang The Expense


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Bwhahahahahaha!
PostPosted: Thu Jul 26, 2007 9:17 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sun May 29, 2005 10:20 pm
Posts: 237
Location: Palatine, Illinois
Quote:
Now THERE'S someone with way to much time on their hands !!



My wife would not agree with you, but I find time to do
important (to me) B-17 things.

_________________
-Bill
B-17E 41-2595 "Desert Rat" Restoration Team


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Thu Jul 26, 2007 9:31 pm 
Offline
3000+ Post Club
3000+ Post Club
User avatar

Joined: Thu Mar 24, 2005 10:10 pm
Posts: 4173
Location: Pearland, Texas
I wasn't referring to the honored past time of researching aviation details, Lord knows I'm just as guilty as the rest of you, BUT, I've never counted skin rivets. Usually mods can be seen by looking at the patterns without actually COUNTING the rivets. :shock:

And Dry Martini, I have spent many hours researching the history and working on a certain A-26 that's out behind the barn at Michaels place. :x


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Rivets
PostPosted: Thu Jul 26, 2007 10:23 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sun May 29, 2005 10:20 pm
Posts: 237
Location: Palatine, Illinois


The rivet thing actually wasn't me.
:-)

The A-26 is still there. Wish we had more room
to do something about her.

_________________
-Bill
B-17E 41-2595 "Desert Rat" Restoration Team


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Fri Jul 27, 2007 8:06 am 
Offline
3000+ Post Club
3000+ Post Club
User avatar

Joined: Thu Sep 28, 2006 12:56 pm
Posts: 3442
Location: North of Texas, South of Kansas
While we're on this subject, does anyone have photos of any of the Y1B-17's in service during the early part of the war? Those are the most interesting early Fortresses to try to find good information on, and any help would be appreciated!

Scott


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Fri Jul 27, 2007 1:10 pm 
Offline
3000+ Post Club
3000+ Post Club
User avatar

Joined: Sun Nov 07, 2004 2:02 am
Posts: 4742
Location: Yucca Valley, CA
Quote:
Questions? ... the narrator stated at the end of the movie that the B-17D "Mary-Ann" went to war right after the movie was completed and that she was destroyed in combat ... could this be true?


I remember seeing this mentioned in one of the original reviews of the movie from 1943; probably came straight from the press kit from the studio. More likely it was wrecked in a training mishap, and the story got embellished by either the studio or the USAAF.

_________________
Image
All right, Mister Dorfmann, start pullin'!
Pilot: "Flap switch works hard in down position."
Mechanic: "Flap switch checked OK. Pilot needs more P.T." - Flight report, TB-17G 42-102875 (Hobbs AAF)


Top
 Profile  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 14 posts ] 

All times are UTC - 5 hours


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Google [Bot] and 150 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group