Warbird Information Exchange

DISCLAIMER: The views expressed on this site are the responsibility of the poster and do not reflect the views of the management.
It is currently Sun May 03, 2026 3:31 am

All times are UTC - 5 hours


Classic Wings Magazine WWII Naval Aviation Research Pacific Luftwaffe Resource Center
When Hollywood Ruled The Skies - Volumes 1 through 4 by Bruce Oriss


Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 41 posts ]  Go to page 1, 2, 3  Next
Author Message
PostPosted: Mon Jul 16, 2007 3:56 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Tue Jan 30, 2007 11:01 am
Posts: 66
Location: Colorado
With no system changes, our TBM Avenger began experiencing a consistent problem with the first gear retraction of each flight. Both gear hangs at about 10 degrees (about 80% retracted) and hydraulic pressure is good at 1400 PSI. Manual pump does not help. If I then select "gear down" I get a full and locked (whew :( ) extension. Any further gear selection up/down works just fine - until the next flight.

If after the first full retraction I can make full stop landings the gear will work fine. If I land, shut down the engine and restart, it will still work. However if I land, shut down, and bleed the "general" system with cowl flap operation, then restart and fly, we go back to "no full retraction" on initial try.

If I take off with say a 15 degree flap setting, and have set myself up for the initial "hang" retraction, after the gear hangs I find that a "more flaps" setting has no effect (flaps still at 15). But a "retract flaps" setting will result in full flaps retraction after an abnormal delay of about ten seconds, followed by the gear going the rest of the way (gear handle still full "up" throughout.) No other interaction of gear/flap noted in other flight regimes.

We have replaced the gear/flap selector and hydraulic pump. The pump we use has a built-in unloader valve and original TBM plumbing modified accordingly a few years ago. No leaks noted. Gear retract cylinders are just four years old. Accumulator holds 500 PSI consistently. Squat mechanism verified as fully functional. Verified that all in-line hydraulic filters are clean. Much of this trouble shooting was provided remotely by John Lane (THANK YOU). We have the original manuals (but would be grateful for additional copies, especially if they are in the original color - that hydraulic system diagram is hard to read in black and white!)

I have just removed the Thermal Relief Manifold for overhaul, and we have had some discussions about "back pressure" but can't find the source.

Any other TBM or warbird Hydraulic Experts out there?


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Mon Jul 16, 2007 4:03 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Mon May 03, 2004 8:26 pm
Posts: 632
Call John Lane at Airpower Unlimited 208 324 3650. He is the one we always turn to when we have problems with the one that I have flown.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Jul 16, 2007 5:16 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Tue Jan 30, 2007 11:01 am
Posts: 66
Location: Colorado
That would be the same John Lane I mentioned in my original post. I have also talked with Harlan and the Candian guys still operating four TBM's as SEATs. It was time to take the problem to the WIX.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Mon Jul 16, 2007 5:26 pm 
Offline
Been here a long time
Been here a long time

Joined: Sun May 02, 2004 1:16 am
Posts: 11336
Any possibility you are getting air in the system somehow?


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Jul 16, 2007 5:31 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Mon May 03, 2004 8:26 pm
Posts: 632
duncan wrote:
That would be the same John Lane I mentioned in my original post. I have also talked with Harlan and the Candian guys still operating four TBM's as SEATs. It was time to take the problem to the WIX.


Doh! Sorry I missed that!


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Mon Jul 16, 2007 5:41 pm 
Offline
2000+ Post Club
2000+ Post Club
User avatar

Joined: Sun Jul 31, 2005 7:28 pm
Posts: 2184
Location: Waukesha, WI
How is the retrack affected by cowl flap operation? If the cowl flap bleed down seems to be the trigger for the start of the issue, what would operation of the cowl flaps during flight do to the retract issue?

Are there one way valves in the system that could hang up or stick? Are all the systems operated by dual action cylinders? When the gear retract, the "extend" fluid has to return to the system (resevoir) by the piston travel. Is it being diverted to other hydraulic cylinders cowl flaps or flaps that causes the delay as a result of a faulty check valve?

Is it possible to have a faulty accumulator that has bled hydraulic fluid past a diaphram that once cycled properly, functions properly? It could still show adequate pressure but result in a low total hydraulic system fluid volume by having an unaccounted for place for fluid to collect.

Sorry, probably out to lunch but just ramblings of an old Indy car mechaninc.

_________________
"There are old pilots and bold pilots but few old, bold pilots."


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Mon Jul 16, 2007 5:44 pm 
Offline
BANNED/ACCOUNT SUSPENDED
User avatar

Joined: Sun Oct 24, 2004 12:37 pm
Posts: 1197
Just because something is overhauled doesn't mean it is good.. I had to replace items 4 times untill I got a good one.. which really complicates trouble shooting


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Mon Jul 16, 2007 6:35 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Tue Jan 30, 2007 11:01 am
Posts: 66
Location: Colorado
BDK - Air was an original thought. So we would exercise all other hydraulic systems several time while on the ground. Gear still failed first retraction. Other than the suction line from reservoir to pump, it seems any place that would draw air would also visibly leak 5606 fluid.

Savage - NP - :D I often jump to conclusions before reading a long boring thread (like mine!)

S Dennison - the cylinders are indeed dual action. However I am sure the retraction side requires a LOT more pressure than the extension side. Emergency extension is also accomplished with free-fall and zero pressure. That is why the uplocks - don't want any extra drag when trying to run away from somebody who shot up your hydraulics! Another note, we have left the plane in gear up on jacks for hours with no leak down to where the up-locks are engaged. Hydraulic fluid does not appear to get "lost" and the accumulator has held charge with no servicing. John Lane mentioned that many TBM operators have changed from the original diaphragm style to newer piston style as it is more robust. We still might do that.

Cowl flap operation while flying has no apparent affect. I just used the cowl flaps to bleed off all hydraulic pressure as that is the only way I know of, short of breaking a line.

Broken-Wrench - a valid point indeed!


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Mon Jul 16, 2007 6:53 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Tue Dec 06, 2005 10:05 am
Posts: 972
Location: Mesa, Az
With the system pressure at Zero, what does your accumalator pressure read? How about system pressure at 1000PSI?

_________________
The more I learn about aircraft, the more I realize I still have to learn.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Mon Jul 16, 2007 6:58 pm 
Offline
2000+ Post Club
2000+ Post Club
User avatar

Joined: Sun Jul 31, 2005 7:28 pm
Posts: 2184
Location: Waukesha, WI
What about the cowl flap operation in relation to the gear retract in flight? Same effect as the wing flaps? What is the color of the fluid? Solid in color or pastell due to micro-bubbles?

What about a possible loss of prime to the pump? How is the pump fed from the reservoir? Gravity? Possible feed line restriction? Can you run the full gamit of diagnostic actions on stands without flying? (sorry)

My thoughts on accumulators are that I have seen diaphragm issues where the accumulator actually stores fluid behind the diaphragm. It will still hold pressure and appear normal but it is working on a reduced volume. More importantly, it has reduced the hydraulic system volume. Once initially presurized by the pump operation, the fluid could be forced back into the system thus filling it and operation normal.

OK, I'll shut up now. :lol:

_________________
"There are old pilots and bold pilots but few old, bold pilots."


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Mon Jul 16, 2007 8:54 pm 
Offline
3000+ Post Club
3000+ Post Club
User avatar

Joined: Fri Mar 02, 2007 6:52 pm
Posts: 3418
Location: Wichita Falls, Texas, USA
Here's a question -

Must pressure be bled off the system at shutdown? Just as a "troubleshoot" item, if possible, could you try not bleeding off the pressure one time and see if the problem duplicates without a bleed-down?


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Mon Jul 16, 2007 9:49 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Tue Jan 31, 2006 1:51 am
Posts: 365
Location: Ypsilanti, MI
I'll be the token "guy that makes a dumb suggestion."

Any chance this issue could be related to the fluid you're using? What's different between what you're using now and what 'the book' says to use?

_________________
Phil K.
Yankee Air Museum
Systems Admin / Ramp Crew / Professional Photo Ruiner


Last edited by chico on Tue Jul 17, 2007 10:13 am, edited 1 time in total.

Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Tue Jul 17, 2007 8:54 am 
Offline

Joined: Sun May 02, 2004 9:46 am
Posts: 14
Location: Perth Australia
Colour hydraulics diagram for avenger from a Grumman maintenance manual.

Image

Image

Image

Image

:?: I'm definately no expert in this, but the original system worked to prevent gear retraction whilst the flaps were down.

"If I take off with say a 15 degree flap setting, and have set myself up for the initial "hang" retraction, after the gear hangs I find that a "more flaps" setting has no effect (flaps still at 15). But a "retract flaps" setting will result in full flaps retraction after an abnormal delay of about ten seconds, followed by the gear going the rest of the way (gear handle still full "up" throughout.) No other interaction of gear/flap noted in other flight regimes. "

Another dumb question is if this was the case when built, has the system been modified, and is this an issue?


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Tue Jul 17, 2007 9:05 am 
Offline
3000+ Post Club
3000+ Post Club
User avatar

Joined: Thu Mar 24, 2005 10:10 pm
Posts: 4173
Location: Pearland, Texas
Phil, most likely they are using MIL 5606 as that is the standard fluid that we all use. The other is MIL 83282 is a fire resistant alternative that is compatible with 5606. The only other fluid that is out there is called Skydrol, a nasty substance only found in some civilian jets.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Tue Jul 17, 2007 9:53 am 
Offline

Joined: Wed Nov 09, 2005 1:35 pm
Posts: 636
chico wrote:
I'll be the token "guy that makes a dumb suggestion."

Any chance this could be related to the issue could be related to the fluid you're using? What's different between what you're using now and what 'the book' says to use?


I'll be the second one. I say start at the beginning by draining the fluid over a long amount of time such as overnite. Refill with new fluid. No reason to back this up. Ill be anxious to here the answer.


Top
 Profile  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 41 posts ]  Go to page 1, 2, 3  Next

All times are UTC - 5 hours


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Google [Bot] and 76 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group