Warbird Information Exchange

DISCLAIMER: The views expressed on this site are the responsibility of the poster and do not reflect the views of the management.
It is currently Thu Jul 10, 2025 12:32 pm

All times are UTC - 5 hours


Classic Wings Magazine WWII Naval Aviation Research Pacific Luftwaffe Resource Center
When Hollywood Ruled The Skies - Volumes 1 through 4 by Bruce Oriss


Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 13 posts ] 
Author Message
 Post subject: Kalamazoo Air Zoo
PostPosted: Thu Apr 12, 2007 10:06 am 
Offline

Joined: Mon Nov 07, 2005 8:45 pm
Posts: 180
Location: CNY
This may have been asked before but here goes. Are the planes at Kalamazoo still kept in flying condition or are they just sitting static.
I appreciate their decision not to fly because they are the only ones who know the true facts but when ever I think of that beautiful Tigercat sitting on the ground and not flying I get a little upset


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Thu Apr 12, 2007 10:16 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sat Jul 03, 2004 8:14 pm
Posts: 236
Location: Lancaster, NY
I know how you feel. I really miss seeing some of the birds at airshows. In particular the displays with the Tigercat.

And just think, there could have easily been 6 Thunderbolts scheduled for Thunder Over Michigan this year had they still been flying the planes.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Thu Apr 12, 2007 12:56 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Jan 06, 2005 7:24 pm
Posts: 481
Location: South Carolina
After sitting for a few years i am sure they would need new batteries, oil, fuel tanks flushed out and other maintance, annual inspections etc. before they fly again.
The last few years they were flying i don't think they went to far from home to shows
Here are pictures i post a while back!
http://warbirdinformationexchange.org/phpBB2/viewtopic.php?t=11399&postdays=0&postorder=asc&start=0


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Thu Apr 12, 2007 7:21 pm 
Offline
2000+ Post Club
2000+ Post Club
User avatar

Joined: Sun Oct 24, 2004 7:49 pm
Posts: 2172
Location: West Lafayette, Ind.
Currently, they are sitting static. The Trimotor is under restoration to fly again after corrosion was found in the wing spar, but to my knowledge no work has been carried out on any of the fighters since 2000. I was told that the Tigercat would need a new engine if it were to fly again, and the P-47 is in the new building, which does not have runway access. Another thing to keep in mind is that these restorations are fairly old ( mostly from the early to mid 80s with the exception of the Bearcat) and would probably require an extensive IRAN if they were to fly again. And these airplanes were flow a LOT at airshows in their day.

Unfortunately I don't think we will see any of the aircraft in the air anytime soon. There was an article in the local paper recently that they arenot meeting attendance expectations and I was told by a docent that they don't have the money$ to finish the Trimotor at this time. Probably because they're busy keeping their amusement park rides open. Right now the near future doesn't look good for the Air Zoo fighters being back in the air.

_________________
Matt


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Thu Apr 12, 2007 10:52 pm 
Offline
3000+ Post Club
3000+ Post Club

Joined: Thu Dec 21, 2006 8:32 am
Posts: 4333
Location: Battle Creek, MI
The last time any of the fighters flew was Halloween Day 2000, when Barry Smith took the Hellcat up for a final spin (a bunch of us piled into the Tri-Motor and he did some flybys for us.) The Cats have been hangared since then, with the engines "pickled." As KK mentioned, I'm sure they'd need considerable maintenance to get back into the air.

I was told that one of the wings on the P-47 was very worn structurally..also, when they moved it to the new building, EPA regs required draining all fluids, which required them to drill holes through the landing gear struts and bolting the shocks in place..effectively rendering the plane non-airworthy.

I really miss the sound of round engines around here...


SN


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Thu Apr 12, 2007 11:13 pm 
Offline
Pvt. Joker
User avatar

Joined: Tue Oct 11, 2005 12:22 pm
Posts: 1012
Location: Location: Location!
Steve Nelson wrote:
I was told that one of the wings on the P-47 was very worn structurally..also, when they moved it to the new building, EPA regs required draining all fluids, which required them to drill holes through the landing gear struts and bolting the shocks in place..effectively rendering the plane non-airworthy.

Steve, not that the EPA has done some silly things, but that seems a bit extreme.

Could you provide some background, please?

_________________
Image
Commemorative Air Force
Experimental Aircraft Association
Warbirds of America

What are you waiting for? Join us!

Best way to contact me- email my last name @gmail.com


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Fri Apr 13, 2007 1:14 am 
Offline

Joined: Sat Apr 08, 2006 7:17 pm
Posts: 301
I used to enjoy going to the Kalamazoo show every year. They just ought to sell the planes to somebody who will put them back in the air.

_________________
"I love the smell of racing gas in the morning"
www.timadamsphotography.com


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Fri Apr 13, 2007 1:52 am 
Offline
Long Time Member
Long Time Member
User avatar

Joined: Sat Dec 02, 2006 9:10 am
Posts: 9720
Location: Pittsburgher misplaced in Oshkosh
While I wish that they were able to keep the aircraft in the air, I think that they have a great museum. I for one love the new facility. Plans are to down the road move the entire collection over there and expand the building. I think it is a great place, and hope that they do well.

_________________
Chris Henry
EAA Aviation Museum Manager


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Fri Apr 13, 2007 9:10 am 
Offline
3000+ Post Club
3000+ Post Club
User avatar

Joined: Thu Apr 27, 2006 2:10 pm
Posts: 3249
Location: New York
The foundation of the Oshkosh warbird turnout in the 1980s used to be the Air Zoo and Pond (POF East) collections. Those two used to make a max effort and between the two of them you could count on having one of most, and two of many, of the major fighter types on the field. Anything else that came (which was a lot, of course) mostly just ratcheted up the multiples. Since the Zoo called it quits and POF East became POF Not-So-Far-East, the OSH warbird field has done fine of course, but the mainstays are missed and often you get gaps (e.g. most years no Hellcat turns up).

I would never wish financial ill-fortune on anyone, but if attendance is down, perhaps that is a signal that the airplanes' pickled status is hurting interest in them and it is time either to get some of them active or sell them to someone who will.

August


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Fri Apr 13, 2007 10:07 am 
Offline
Long Time Member
Long Time Member
User avatar

Joined: Sat Dec 02, 2006 9:10 am
Posts: 9720
Location: Pittsburgher misplaced in Oshkosh
It would be a shame to sell and break up that awsome collection.

_________________
Chris Henry
EAA Aviation Museum Manager


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Fri Apr 13, 2007 10:36 am 
Offline
3000+ Post Club
3000+ Post Club
User avatar

Joined: Thu Apr 27, 2006 2:10 pm
Posts: 3249
Location: New York
I agree but, you know, things change. If it were a choice between 10 scattered warbirds returning to the airshow circuit again versus having them sit together in that building, I'd prefer to see #1. The individual aircraft might even join one of the other, equally nice collections that are always coalescing and breaking up like blobs in a lava lamp. The Air Zoo had a great run and played an important role in raising the bar for warbird restorations in the 70 and 80s, but maybe its time is past.

August


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Fri Apr 13, 2007 4:34 pm 
Offline
3000+ Post Club
3000+ Post Club

Joined: Thu Dec 21, 2006 8:32 am
Posts: 4333
Location: Battle Creek, MI
I was told by the that the main reason for taking the musuem in the new direction was to keep the collection together. The main thing that kept the aircraft flying over the years was a large infusion of private cash from the Parishes and others, which was drying up. That coupled with exponentially increasing insurance and operational costs led to the decision to ground aircraft.

As for draining the fluids, that requirement may have come from OSHA or the fire department or some other "official" agency. Since the new building is not a considered a hangar, having aircraft with fuel or hydraulic fluid in them would be unsafe from an environmental or fire standpoint. Plus, the new building has this "high tech" floor with some kind of expensive polymer coating..I'm sure they don't want potentially corrosive fluids dripping all over it.

I still hope they get the Tri-Motor back in the air. I've flown in her over a dozen times over the years, and really miss the old girl. AFAIK, her last passenger flight was in the fall of 2001. She was in the midst of her spring '02 "shakedown" flights when the corrosion in the spars and center section was discovered.


SN


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Fri Apr 13, 2007 9:17 pm 
Offline
Long Time Member
Long Time Member
User avatar

Joined: Sat Dec 02, 2006 9:10 am
Posts: 9720
Location: Pittsburgher misplaced in Oshkosh
I am for keeping the collection together, and if they are a static museum, than so be it. We need them as well. It would be nice to see them at least have the trimotor in the air though.

_________________
Chris Henry
EAA Aviation Museum Manager


Top
 Profile  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 13 posts ] 

All times are UTC - 5 hours


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Google [Bot] and 34 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group