This is the place where the majority of the warbird (aircraft that have survived military service) discussions will take place. Specialized forums may be added in the new future
Post a reply

Re: I need a flying 707. Seriously.

Mon Oct 24, 2011 8:27 pm

GOOD GRIEF SPEEDY!
You actually defied gravity in one of Joel Eisenbergs ongoing corrosion experiments?? And over deep green water too! I remember watching them disappear hunk by hunk next to the old WEST COAST hanger area @ KBFI. Now that was a mixed bag of original customers in that pile of crap. I think AirlineFan.com has some AEROAMERICA pix.

Somewhere I think I still have a photo of my daughter (@ about 11) standing on a set of airstairs rolled up to one that had been given a 'left side' only to make it look like AIR FORCE ONE for some Kennedy TV movie shot @ KBFI.

Back in 1967 I rode a PACIFIC NORTHERN 720 to ANC in May and rode the same airplane back to SEA in very late Aug and it was wearing WESTERN colors. WESTERN ran the 720's almost into the early 80's and used their ex PNA L-749's in WESTERN markings into the mid 70's.

And, yes running the FE seat in a 707 was a busy job even on a trim run (how many on a show of hands have ever 'chased the mouse' on a JT 3 or 4), I was one of three people certified @ the MRO I worked @ as a QC to run the panel for a series of BURLINGTON EXPRESS 320-c's (scary, you could turn off the work lights inside the tube and see the hanger ceiling lights through the holes in the skins, one of my inspectors said walking in the main cabin was like walking on a waterbed the floors were that bad, the rep challenged one of my inspectors about a corroded stringer 26 in the forward cargo bay, my inspector told him 'when I can remove it with a minivac, it's corroded!). I still remember one poignant exchange between me and the kid on the ground who had never witnessed a dinosaur start 'ready to start 3?' "yep" 'Air in' "OK" (later, that same day) 'N2, fuel in' "OK" 'EGT rise' "OHMYGAWDWEGOTAFIRE" 'Is it still flaming?' "yes, maybe not so much now" 'front or back end?' "back end" 'is it out now?' "yeah" 'congratulations on your first JT-4 start, I've got the generator up on 3, you ready for #4?' :lol: :lol:

Re: I need a flying 707. Seriously.

Tue Nov 01, 2011 9:31 pm

Pic from Fence Check of the Pan Am color on JT's Airplane....
http://www.fencecheck.com/forums/index. ... #msg282827

Image

Re: I need a flying 707. Seriously.

Tue Nov 01, 2011 9:39 pm

JDK wrote:
TonyM wrote:I must be a total oddball--Jet Airliner type aircraft do absolutely nothing for me. They remind me of city buses.

Not at all, I quite agree, and frankly can't be bothered to tell the difference with what I fly in these days. I couldn't tell you what were the types I last flew trans Pacific this May.


Not that I am enamored with airliners...but if it flies...I'm interested....I like balloons, gliders, blimps, whirly birds, Cubs....heck a well made paper airplane is cool to me.
My wife thinks I'm weird...but I think I'm ok.. :axe:

Re: I need a flying 707. Seriously.

Tue Nov 01, 2011 11:49 pm

JDK wrote:
TonyM wrote:I must be a total oddball--Jet Airliner type aircraft do absolutely nothing for me. They remind me of city buses.

Not at all, I quite agree, and frankly can't be bothered to tell the difference with what I fly in these days. I couldn't tell you what were the types I last flew trans Pacific this May.



I have a shamefull admission.
Back in the 80s I was flying American from somewhere to somewhere on business. You couldn't see the airplane thanks to near windowless terminals and jetways. So I boarded what I thought was just another 727...back them I thought we'd fly 727s forever.
Awhile into the flight I pull down the window shade and the tab at the botton read "Super 80". OMG!!!!!
I had to read the emergency card to prove to myself I was in a product of Long Beach and not Seattle.

I was flying in an aircraft I didn't even know what type it was. :shock:
That's how jaded I'd become.
Instead of celebrating each flight, it was now a chore flying in an anonymous tube.

Thankfully, I recovered my senses.
True, jetliners are a bore, but I try to find something fun in every flight...even in an packed Easyjet Airbus.

Re: I need a flying 707. Seriously.

Wed Nov 02, 2011 6:54 am

Zane wrote;
but I think I'm ok


And you wonder why people question your judgement ! :D

Re: I need a flying 707. Seriously.

Wed Nov 02, 2011 7:33 am

Lots of publicity for Qantas this week, and lots of articles spelling it just as I have.

Re: I need a flying 707. Seriously.

Wed Nov 02, 2011 8:01 am

Ztex wrote:Pic from Fence Check of the Pan Am color on JT's Airplane....
http://www.fencecheck.com/forums/index. ... #msg282827

Image


These 'Pan Am' show guys.., ever hear of CGI?

They obviously used it on her tail.., why not on the rest of the bird?

Did JT do all the flying himself?

Re: I need a flying 707. Seriously.

Wed Nov 02, 2011 8:25 am

the330thbg wrote:These 'Pan Am' show guys.., ever hear of CGI?

They obviously used it on her tail.., why not on the rest of the bird?

And if you're going to the trouble of putting a fictitious N-number on it, why not make it an accurate one ? Don't understand these Hollywood types and their 'consultants' :? .

Re: I need a flying 707. Seriously.

Wed Nov 02, 2011 11:18 am

And I imagine the owners of that 1956 Cessna 170 are wondering how their number (N1703D) was chosen :roll: ...

I recorded the show last Sunday and when I watched it last night, there were a bunch of promos for a story about a stewardess who was one of the victims of the Gambler's Special DC-3 crash that would be on the local L.A. Channel 7 news afterward - but I didn't record the news. Did any L.A. WIXers see it?

Edit: here's the link:

http://abclocal.go.com/kabc/story?secti ... id=8412064

Re: I need a flying 707. Seriously.

Wed Nov 02, 2011 1:20 pm

These 'Pan Am' show guys.., ever hear of CGI?

They obviously used it on her tail.., why not on the rest of the bird?

Did JT do all the flying himself?


They heard of CGI, then went to WIX (free consulting) and found out we just dont like CGI.....and decided to go for the real deal!

Re: I need a flying 707. Seriously.

Wed Nov 02, 2011 1:58 pm

the330thbg wrote:These 'Pan Am' show guys.., ever hear of CGI?

They obviously used it on her tail.., why not on the rest of the bird?

Did JT do all the flying himself?


I guess you missed the weeks of us complaining about how inaccurate all their CGI work was then. ;)

BTW, a lot of productions do this. They go all CGI at first until they are "stable" as a show and then start spending the money to get the real deal when they can. Prison Break followed this model for sure as did a couple others I'm aware of. With the way they do shows today (where they don't even order a full season off the bat) cost is a major concern so they minimize them until they know they're going to be able to have the money coming in to cover the expense of doing things like using real airplanes.

Re: I need a flying 707. Seriously.

Wed Nov 02, 2011 4:25 pm

Is the paint job poster paint or wax?

Re: I need a flying 707. Seriously.

Wed Nov 02, 2011 5:18 pm

If I owned that airplane (ha), I'd get the production company to paint the whole thing in the correct Pan Am colors and then keep it that way.

Re: I need a flying 707. Seriously.

Wed Nov 02, 2011 6:02 pm

1) It was a vinyl wrap that they used according to FenceCheck.

2) Qantas has already paid Mr. Travolta a handsome sum of money to have it in the V-Jet livery. I think they'd be mad if he repainted it now, especially as the aircraft is originally a Quantas aircraft, not PanAm. - http://jetphotos.net/census/aircraft2.p ... =707-18740

Only other "correct" paint scheme for the aircraft would be Braniff Light Blue - http://www.planepictures.net/netshow.php?id=14106

Re: I need a flying 707. Seriously.

Thu Nov 03, 2011 11:21 am

Did JT do all the flying himself?


It probably will come as a surprise to many, as Travolta has done his best to make the world think he's a four-striper, but his only 707 certification is as F/O, with a real, rated captain in the left seat.
Post a reply