Sat Aug 22, 2009 7:32 pm
rreis wrote:Jiggersfromsphilly wrote:ME 110
I think there's one the the RAF Museum in Hendon and surely there is one at the Technik Museum in Berlin.
Sat Aug 22, 2009 7:32 pm
rreis wrote:Jiggersfromsphilly wrote:ME 110
I think there's one the the RAF Museum in Hendon and surely there is one at the Technik Museum in Berlin.
Thu Aug 27, 2009 8:10 am
Thu Aug 27, 2009 10:14 am
aseanaero wrote:My vote for the most complex warbird goes to ....
a Zeppelin !
The bill to build a replica of one of these would make a billionaire shudder
Thu Aug 27, 2009 10:24 am
to do is wrap an old truss-type bridge in canvas, dope & seal it, and pump it full of gas (preferably helium, please!)
Thu Aug 27, 2009 11:05 am
Thu Aug 27, 2009 6:13 pm
Rajay wrote:I'm guessing that the steel framework is pretty simple and not even up to "real" aviation structural standards. (Does it have to withstand 3 g's or more?) You don't need A&P mechanics to rivet it together - all you need are some old bridge workers.
Thu Aug 27, 2009 6:23 pm
JDK wrote:Rajay wrote:I'm guessing that the steel framework is pretty simple and not even up to "real" aviation structural standards. (Does it have to withstand 3 g's or more?) You don't need A&P mechanics to rivet it together - all you need are some old bridge workers.
Guess again, or have a look at the published data on the development of airships. Don't kid yourself that they were anything but the cutting edge of aviation technology in their day, and it's clear you've missed the critical point of the massive requirement for weight saving - something to match the modern airliner building business with the demands.
Thu Aug 27, 2009 8:05 pm
Thu Aug 27, 2009 9:04 pm