Warbird Information Exchange

DISCLAIMER: The views expressed on this site are the responsibility of the poster and do not reflect the views of the management.
It is currently Thu Apr 16, 2026 2:16 am

All times are UTC - 5 hours


Classic Wings Magazine WWII Naval Aviation Research Pacific Luftwaffe Resource Center
When Hollywood Ruled The Skies - Volumes 1 through 4 by Bruce Oriss


Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 77 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6  Next
Author Message
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Mon Mar 17, 2008 10:06 pm 
Offline

Joined: Sun Dec 12, 2004 7:27 pm
Posts: 264
Location: Indiantown, FL
Sure looks like a late stabilizer from what I can tell in your pictures. How did you determine it was an early one?


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Tue Mar 18, 2008 6:26 am 
Offline
3000+ Post Club
3000+ Post Club
User avatar

Joined: Tue Jul 17, 2007 9:11 pm
Posts: 3160
Location: MQS- Coatesville, PA
Glenn Wegman wrote:
Sure looks like a late stabilizer from what I can tell in your pictures. How did you determine it was an early one?

Glenn,
Thanks for your input.
My reference was this P-51D in the late and early callouts.
From what I know there was the P-51 horizontal used basically from the A to the earliest D.
Early in the P-51 D use they made a change and the horizontal design was modified to a -100. This is what I am working on.
Then there was a further design change and that was the -200.
Thru my tunnel vision I referred to the -100 as early and the -200 as late.
Do I need to be educated further?
Thanks for your input.
Rich


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Tue Mar 18, 2008 6:54 am 
Offline

Joined: Sun Dec 12, 2004 7:27 pm
Posts: 264
Location: Indiantown, FL
Hello Rich,

Looks like you're having fun!

As I mentioned, it is a littgle difficult to see from your pictures so please excuse me if I am incorrect, but it appears to have the later style reinfoeced outer ribs, (spot welded doublers) Hy-Shear rivets in the elevator attach fittings, the short front feet, and the doubler on the front spar. The reason I asked is that I was just in a shop where they were modifying a late stabilizer "backwards" by installing doublers to the ribs and replacing the Hi-Shears with AD rivets per the T.O. for the early stabilizer. Some people also get tricked by the 73- forged in part number on the rear feet when what they did was use the same forgings for the late feet and then very faintly stamped the 122- number in them with number stamps so they appera to be 73- feet ad first inspection. If you really are removing the late stabilizer from the airplane and installing the early one, don't forget to modify the vertical stabilizer "backwards" to match it.

The other way to tell is to fly it! Early stabilizers seem to fly with the elev trim about 0° and late ones need about 4°-5° nose down at cruise due to the incidence change.

Nice Monarch!


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Tue Mar 18, 2008 8:10 am 
Offline
3000+ Post Club
3000+ Post Club
User avatar

Joined: Tue Jul 17, 2007 9:11 pm
Posts: 3160
Location: MQS- Coatesville, PA
Glenn Wegman wrote:
Hello Rich,

Looks like you're having fun!

As I mentioned, it is a littgle difficult to see from your pictures so please excuse me if I am incorrect, but it appears to have the later style reinfoeced outer ribs, (spot welded doublers) Hy-Shear rivets in the elevator attach fittings, the short front feet, and the doubler on the front spar. The reason I asked is that I was just in a shop where they were modifying a late stabilizer "backwards" by installing doublers to the ribs and replacing the Hi-Shears with AD rivets per the T.O. for the early stabilizer. Some people also get tricked by the 73- forged in part number on the rear feet when what they did was use the same forgings for the late feet and then very faintly stamped the 122- number in them with number stamps so they appera to be 73- feet ad first inspection. If you really are removing the late stabilizer from the airplane and installing the early one, don't forget to modify the vertical stabilizer "backwards" to match it.

The other way to tell is to fly it! Early stabilizers seem to fly with the elev trim about 0° and late ones need about 4°-5° nose down at cruise due to the incidence change.

Nice Monarch!

Glenn,
This does have the beefier outboard ribs but the mounts are early style.
The fronts are stamped 73-21031.
The horizontal I am rebuilding was installed along with the current vertical prior to the restoration.
Rich


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Tue Mar 18, 2008 11:56 am 
Offline

Joined: Sun Dec 12, 2004 7:27 pm
Posts: 264
Location: Indiantown, FL
How far do the front feet protrude from the lower skin?


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Tue Mar 18, 2008 12:34 pm 
Offline
3000+ Post Club
3000+ Post Club
User avatar

Joined: Tue Jul 17, 2007 9:11 pm
Posts: 3160
Location: MQS- Coatesville, PA
Glenn Wegman wrote:
How far do the front feet protrude from the lower skin?

The aft edge is approx .875 below the skin.
I believe the later w/incidence change was around .500 at that same point IIRC.
Measured parallel to the aft edge of the fitting from the mounting flat to skin mounted to the rib.
Rich


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Tue Mar 18, 2008 2:00 pm 
Offline

Joined: Sun Dec 12, 2004 7:27 pm
Posts: 264
Location: Indiantown, FL
Yes, the late style were shorter in the front and taller in the rear. That's why I was curious about needing to modify the vertical fin to match that stabilizer when it is installed. Assuming that you are using the vertical fin that is already installed on the tail cone.

Thanks Rich!


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Tue Mar 18, 2008 2:15 pm 
Offline
3000+ Post Club
3000+ Post Club
User avatar

Joined: Tue Jul 17, 2007 9:11 pm
Posts: 3160
Location: MQS- Coatesville, PA
Glenn Wegman wrote:
Yes, the late style were shorter in the front and taller in the rear. That's why I was curious about needing to modify the vertical fin to match that stabilizer when it is installed. Assuming that you are using the vertical fin that is already installed on the tail cone.

Thanks Rich!

All the same as previously installed.
I hope all will bolt back together.
Rich


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Tue Mar 18, 2008 3:47 pm 
Offline

Joined: Sun Dec 12, 2004 7:27 pm
Posts: 264
Location: Indiantown, FL
Rich,

That's why I'm a little curious. There is an angular difference and a height difference in the front foot between early and late vertical fins. The front foot on the vertical is different when used with the late horizontal due to the different angle of incidence and the rear feet of the horizontal being taller. Things get a little bound up when mismatched.

Glenn


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Tue Mar 18, 2008 6:40 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Jul 19, 2007 11:32 pm
Posts: 697
Location: KBLI
Rich, Thanks for starting this thread.

Lots of good Mustang airframe info. here (for us beginners)

_________________
"They can teach MONKEYS to fly better than that"

http://www.heritageflight.org
http://www.bravo369.org


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Tue Mar 18, 2008 7:57 pm 
Offline
2000+ Post Club
2000+ Post Club
User avatar

Joined: Sun Jul 31, 2005 7:28 pm
Posts: 2184
Location: Waukesha, WI
Glenn Wegman wrote:
Rich,

That's why I'm a little curious. There is an angular difference and a height difference in the front foot between early and late vertical fins. The front foot on the vertical is different when used with the late horizontal due to the different angle of incidence and the rear feet of the horizontal being taller. Things get a little bound up when mismatched.

Glenn


Wow! :shock: Did you have lessons or just sleep at a Holiday Inn Express last night? :wink: (Oshkosh this year?)

For us old time fabricators who love warbirds, this is cool sh&t! Sorry for evesdropping on a tech conversation but you guys are good!

_________________
"There are old pilots and bold pilots but few old, bold pilots."


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Sun Mar 23, 2008 4:24 pm 
Offline
3000+ Post Club
3000+ Post Club
User avatar

Joined: Tue Jul 17, 2007 9:11 pm
Posts: 3160
Location: MQS- Coatesville, PA
Latest Photo of some of the cleaned up parts.
Spars and stringers have been glass bead blasted. The long upper extrusion angle will need to be replaced. The lower stringers are formed angles from sheet and cleaned up ok.
I have a few ribs to finish up cleaning and inspecting.
I had to add HVAC 6" x 8' flex conduit to either side of the 3' x 4' cabinet to be able clean the longer pieces. Even then to do the stringers which are 12' long I added a nipple used to bottle feed a calf to the end of the flex tube. This allowed me to insert the angle from the outside.
Although I think it should actually be warning Will Robinson of space intruders. "Danger Will Robinson". Now I am dating myself.
Image
Rich


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Mon Mar 24, 2008 12:14 am 
Offline
1000+ Posts!
1000+ Posts!

Joined: Sun Apr 08, 2007 1:38 am
Posts: 1425
Location: LONE JACK Mo.
Rich,
Sorry not to get in touch with you...got your last message on the cell, but your number came up unlisted/unknown.

Please call again, or email me at onetimehilton@aol.com
Thanks, and enjoy your posts!
Gary Hilton


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Mon Mar 24, 2008 2:14 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Apr 14, 2005 11:19 am
Posts: 800
Location: Vancouver BC
Rich

again, super interesting stuff, thanks for posting the progress.

Another question, if you don't mind: besides the stripping down and visual inspection of the parts that are going to be reused, how & when do you know when to do further NDT like magnafluxing (or its avaition equivalent), x-raying etc.?

Just curious...

cheers!

greg v.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Tue Apr 29, 2008 6:35 pm 
Offline
3000+ Post Club
3000+ Post Club
User avatar

Joined: Tue Jul 17, 2007 9:11 pm
Posts: 3160
Location: MQS- Coatesville, PA
Folks,
We have been working on a number of areas of the Mustang.
I have been fitting the new Odegaard Engine mount- We are fitting the new parts with the other new parts along with many original parts. It is kind like making something from connex, legos and lincoln logs. If you work at it long enough you can get it to fit.
Image
Image
Image
Image
Image
Image
Image
Image
The wings are done in Cal and our own Gary Hilton will be picking them up soon along with a couple of overhauled Merlins. Then its engine hanging time.
Rich


Top
 Profile  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 77 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6  Next

All times are UTC - 5 hours


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Google [Bot] and 55 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group