Warbird Information Exchange

DISCLAIMER: The views expressed on this site are the responsibility of the poster and do not reflect the views of the management.
It is currently Thu Apr 02, 2026 4:03 pm

All times are UTC - 5 hours


Classic Wings Magazine WWII Naval Aviation Research Pacific Luftwaffe Resource Center
When Hollywood Ruled The Skies - Volumes 1 through 4 by Bruce Oriss


Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 82 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6  Next
Author Message
 Post subject: Typhoon bits
PostPosted: Fri Nov 02, 2007 8:51 am 
Offline

Joined: Fri May 18, 2007 6:28 pm
Posts: 192
The entire rear fuselage from aft of the pilots seat through to the rudder is the same on late mk Typhoons as on Tempests. Don't be fooled by the different look to the fin, this is simply a fillet fairing held on by a dozen of so screws to the Typhoon style fin which still lurkes below. Other than the Tempest having tailwhel doors fitted they are the same. I understand late Mk Typhoons even had the hinges fittings for these doors in the tail section, but the doors themselves were not fitted.

George

_________________
BURMA! Sorry, I panicked


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Typhoon Story
PostPosted: Fri Nov 02, 2007 9:20 am 
Offline
1000+ Posts!
1000+ Posts!

Joined: Thu May 27, 2004 8:06 pm
Posts: 1664
Location: Baltimore MD
A friend of mine, sinced passed, was a company commander in the 175th Infantry, 29th Division in WWII. He made it to St Lo, about 45 days, and was the longest surviving company commander of the 29th Division. He told me one day about walking down a lane in a secured area that was close to the front, when he heard aircraft overhead. He looked up to see a Typhoon making a gliding bomb run against him! He blew the air raid whistle and everybody got down. He said his First Sergeant ducked into a small farmhouse and got down on the floor- he stayed out doors in the courtyard of the barn, hugging a wall. He counted 12 Typhoons that made bombing runs on him and the rest of the company. When the aircraft cleared, they started picking up the pieces (including a few killed), and that is when he noticed that the farmhouse had taken a hit. He and the First Sergeant had been friends since 1939, and he thought the worst. He ran over just in time to see his First Sergeant coming out of the doorway, which was nearly the only part standing. The top sergeant was covered head to toe in fine white powder, unhurt, from the disintegrating plaster on the interior of the house. He said that he laughed until he cried, and everybody around was just bawling, asking top if he wanted coffee with his doughnut.

He was wounded pretty seriously a few days later. Very interesting that he had nothing but praise for the fighter bombers. He said that it was a mistake and that they did so much good otherwise that he could forgive them. He said that after the first air support mission he witnessed, he stopped counting the German dead when he couldn't decide how much the percentage of a body should count for one casualty.

I'd like to see a Typhoon flying, if only to remind me of my friend, COL Robert F. Miller. A true gentleman and warrior.

_________________
REMEMBER THE SERGEANT PILOTS!


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Sat Nov 03, 2007 2:08 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sun Jul 31, 2005 11:58 am
Posts: 214
Location: northeastern US
gregv wrote:
L2Driver wrote:
Forced landings, early-on due to engine failure and (later) from combat damage, are usually described as uneventful. The 7-ton airplane pretty much flattened anything in its path, shedding parts (and energy) along the way. By the time the dust settled, it was usually just a matter of unstrapping and stepping out.


Pierre Closterman wrote about his Typhoon forced-landing experiences in "The Big Show", and they sounded downright hellish; maybe he had a bad time with it? Or maybe they were all with the later Tempest, which was somehow different in this respect?
greg v.


Greg,
I haven't read "The Big Show" in quite a long time but I would venture an accurate statement regarding the Typhoon would likely be that they were prone to making emergency landings early on. I've not read anything to convey they didn't land well.

However, alighting on the water was a virtual death sentence -- the thick wings accounting for near instantaneous decelleration. Most assume the chin radiator digging in was the cause of such poor ditching qualities but the Tempest, with its thinner wing, did quite well and often floated for a considerable period before sinking.

A few other great reads: "Day of the Typhoon" by John Golley and "Typhoon Attack" by Norman Franks. Both easy to read and quite informative.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sat Nov 03, 2007 5:32 pm 
Offline

Joined: Tue Jan 02, 2007 3:43 pm
Posts: 11
Location: outremeuse
Graft a Griffon engine onto the sharp end of a mark1a Typhoon and the result is a Hawker Tornado.

This was one of the options when the origin basic airframe was being developed for, potentially, three different engines - Sabre, Griffon and Centaurus.

I think a few Tornadoes actually flew.

aviosaurus


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sat Nov 03, 2007 5:32 pm 
Offline

Joined: Tue Jan 02, 2007 3:43 pm
Posts: 11
Location: outremeuse
Graft a Griffon engine onto the sharp end of a mark1a Typhoon and the result is a Hawker Tornado.

This was one of the options when the origin basic airframe was being developed for, potentially, three different engines - Sabre, Griffon and Centaurus.

I think a few Tornadoes actually flew.

aviosaurus


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Sat Nov 03, 2007 7:24 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Nov 24, 2004 2:20 pm
Posts: 368
Location: UK
Three Tornados flew, two prototypes and the sole production example. All had Rolls-Royce Vultures which is what they were designed to use although one was later re-engined with a Centaurus.

The Griffon was one of the potential engines for the Tempest.

Edit: The Tempest III and IV were supposed to be Griffon powered but neither were completed. One later became one of the Fury prototypes.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Sun Nov 04, 2007 2:45 pm 
Offline
3000+ Post Club
3000+ Post Club

Joined: Fri Sep 17, 2004 9:33 pm
Posts: 4707
Location: refugee in Pasa-GD-dena, Texas
sgt hawk wrote:
Guys I am amazed. The info I'm getting here far exceeds the request. I'm new to this forum so bear with me. I'm an old Vietnam vet 11b40 mos (thats military occupation speacialty light weapons infantry or as we used to say 11b "bullet catcher")
Greg

Funny how it works around here sometimes. This is probably the best Typhoon/Tempest thread
we've had on WIX. One thread, IIRC someone suggested not to waste time on getting a Typhoon
flying because the tails would tear off like the originals..

Robbos and others great photos, some details I didn't know or forgot, some new info..which would
be greatly enhanced if Chippie can get permission to share some pics...Really a great thread!

I dunno if anyone has said it, but welcome to the WIX and thank-you for your service! I served during that
era, but I had a cushy billet with climate control. Of course it was a typical gub'ment operation, when I needed
cold..I got hot, needed dry..I got wet etc. and all vice versa. :lol:
But it beat the he11 out of dodging bugs and terminal lead poisoning!!!

The evolution of the Tornado/Typhoon/Tempest/Fury are a bit twisty and a bit confusing sometimes
add various engine developments stalls, starts and availability issues...oh yes..and there was a war, the subject
will keep you on your toes!

Here's a little online page that may help you with an overview of the aforementioned evolutions...
http://www.faqs.org/docs/air/avcfury.html

Thanks to all for contributions to a great thread on this magnificent machine and the talented
people who made her happen, maintained her, flew her, sacrficed their all and those that survived the
war due to her existence! Fingers crossed we'll see a Tiffy fly one day with
that wonderous Napier H-24!! :D

_________________
He bowls overhand...He is the most interesting man in the world.
"In Peace Japan Breeds War", Eckstein, Harper and Bros., 3rd ed. 1943(1927, 1928,1942)
"Leave it to ol' Slim. I got ideas...and they're all vile, baby." South Dakota Slim
"Ahh..."The Deuce", 28,000 pounds of motherly love." quote from some Mojave Grunt
DBF


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Sun Nov 04, 2007 9:03 pm 
Offline

Joined: Mon Sep 10, 2007 10:07 am
Posts: 351
Location: Evansville, Ill
I'm somewhat glad I started this. I'm learing now that the Napier Sabre engine, in it's later version, developed over 4,000 hp. Should development been givin a chance, this engine could have exceeded the griffon and would be powering speed boats and whatever in the US now! But, too many moving parts and turbines were the direction everyone was headed. Still, we need to get one of these buggers in the air!

_________________
tracers work both ways


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Sun Nov 04, 2007 10:04 pm 
Offline
Been here a long time
Been here a long time

Joined: Sun May 02, 2004 1:16 am
Posts: 11332
Of course the Sabre was somewhat simple compared to the Nomad. Apparently Napier embraced complexity!

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Napier_Nomad

Image


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Sun Nov 04, 2007 10:15 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Nov 24, 2004 2:20 pm
Posts: 368
Location: UK
Can't argue with that. Not an aircraft engine but try a Deltic for complexity.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Napier_Deltic


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Tue Nov 06, 2007 7:09 pm 
Offline

Joined: Mon Sep 10, 2007 10:07 am
Posts: 351
Location: Evansville, Ill
Now I might just ruffle a few feathers, but it seems to me (from recolections) the Brits back then built a lot of their stuff "custom made". I believe Supermarine and Hawker were both guilty of this. And I would also add that they tended to over-engineer things a smite. (I had a 72 Trumph TR6 back in the late 70,s) whatever that's worth. I also understand the preasure they were under to get these Birds on the Continent. I think the later Tempest/Typhoons had mostly eliminated the teething problems. Also thanks for the web site showing a few Tempest's rottng into the ground in Poona, India. Somebody aughta grab them dudes before it's to late.
Greg Hawkins
Woodstock, Ga

_________________
tracers work both ways


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Tue Nov 06, 2007 7:44 pm 
Offline
Warbird Pilot
User avatar

Joined: Sat May 01, 2004 7:16 am
Posts: 727
Location: USA
Why does it have to be an inline engine to get one back in the air? Cant a 3350 suffice as in the Seafuries?

_________________
Live to fly, Fly to live.....


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Tue Nov 06, 2007 8:03 pm 
Offline
2000+ Post Club
2000+ Post Club
User avatar

Joined: Sat May 01, 2004 2:43 am
Posts: 2502
Location: New Zealand
sgt hawk wrote:
Also thanks for the web site showing a few Tempest's rottng into the ground in Poona, India. Somebody aughta grab them dudes before it's to late.
Greg Hawkins
Woodstock, Ga


These Tempests are long gone. Several were recovered by Doug Arnold, and according to some reports he had the remainder bulldozed so no one else could secure them :(

Dave


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Tue Nov 06, 2007 9:42 pm 
Offline
Long Time Member
Long Time Member
User avatar

Joined: Fri Apr 30, 2004 7:13 pm
Posts: 5672
Location: Minnesota, USA
Chuck Gardner wrote:
Why does it have to be an inline engine to get one back in the air? Cant a 3350 suffice as in the Seafuries?


You'd be trying to cheat physics.

The Sabre is 40 inches wide. The R-3350 has a diameter over 55 inches. The Tiffy's poor cowling would pop a button or two with that kind of stretch.

_________________
It was a good idea, it just didn't work.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Tue Nov 06, 2007 9:55 pm 
I think history has probably made the Sabre out to be a bigger piece of unreliable junk than was really the case. Obviously it was complicated and had it's share of problems, but if it was as bad as it's been suggested I doubt that there ever would have been a Typhoon or Tempest - period. What a pity that we'll probably never REALLY find out.

Dan


Top
  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 82 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6  Next

All times are UTC - 5 hours


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 87 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group