Tue Feb 06, 2024 8:55 pm
Stephan Wilkinson wrote:One thing that bothered me, because it's so simple yet so stupid, is that in episode one or two--can't remember which--there's a scene of a B-17 crashing, in the distance, and what the viewer sees is a long, thin trail of smoke, angling straight down from several thousand feet and ending in a distant fireball. Soon thereafter, two pilots are discussing the incident and one asks the other what happened.
"Turned base to final too steeply, stalled and spun."
Don't they have any technical advisors?
Wed Feb 07, 2024 12:23 am
Wed Feb 07, 2024 12:23 am
Wed Feb 07, 2024 1:11 pm
Wed Feb 07, 2024 3:31 pm
p51 wrote:Watching again, I've notoced that some CGI scenes seem off, like how open parachutes and flares seem to hang with airplanes instead of dropping away quickly as they would in real life.
That, and there seems to be a LOT of German fighters struck by the gunners, well beyond what postwar analysis supports. A friend said it best, that it probably represents how those gunners recalled the missions afterwards.
Wed Feb 07, 2024 8:04 pm
Stephan Wilkinson wrote:One thing that bothered me, because it's so simple yet so stupid, is that in episode one or two--can't remember which--there's a scene of a B-17 crashing, in the distance, and what the viewer sees is a long, thin trail of smoke, angling straight down from several thousand feet and ending in a distant fireball. Soon thereafter, two pilots are discussing the incident and one asks the other what happened.
"Turned base to final too steeply, stalled and spun."
Don't they have any technical advisors?
Wed Feb 07, 2024 8:07 pm
Randy Haskin wrote:dougdrivr wrote:Question for you B-17 experts. What is that graph/chart on the armored headrests behind the pilots ? I've never seen that before. Looks like some kind of performance or weight and balance decal ?
Wed Feb 07, 2024 8:14 pm
Mark Allen M wrote:p51 wrote:Watching again, I've notoced that some CGI scenes seem off, like how open parachutes and flares seem to hang with airplanes instead of dropping away quickly as they would in real life.
That, and there seems to be a LOT of German fighters struck by the gunners, well beyond what postwar analysis supports. A friend said it best, that it probably represents how those gunners recalled the missions afterwards.
No! it's just the typical Hollywood "Pearl Harbor" overkill of CGI to keep the masses of uninformed viewers interested. In reality there's only a small base of viewers who would have preferred this series be more CGI authentic and fact based. Unfortunately for those in the small base of viewers, i.e. historians, veterans, enthusiasts, the much larger uninformed viewers are the producers target audience. And you can't blame them due to the massive cost to create this series.
For a small amount of us the MOTA developers "misuse" of a great tool such as CGI ruins the sense of reality of what actually took place during this time in history. The strong feelings that were experienced while watching "Saving Private Ryan" and "Band of Brothers" is just not happening.... yet anyway!
IMHO so far.
Wed Feb 07, 2024 8:22 pm
Wed Feb 07, 2024 11:19 pm
Thu Feb 08, 2024 5:53 pm
dougdrivr wrote:Stephan Wilkinson wrote:the fresh green primer even has scuff mark where people walk. So impressed I've had to freeze frame some of it.
Thu Feb 08, 2024 6:03 pm
Fri Feb 09, 2024 7:00 am
dougdrivr wrote:Some of the critic reviews that seem to take giddy delight in bashing this series are stomach turning but this one takes the cake. The last paragraph is particularly disgusting,
"At this point, Hanks and Spielburg are taking it for granted that we all have a middle-aged father's interest in World War II"
https://www.laineygossip.com/tv-review- ... ving/77636
Fri Feb 09, 2024 8:35 am
Fri Feb 09, 2024 9:55 am
Snake45 wrote:Just out of curiosity (I haven't seen a second of MoA), how does its CGI/animation compare to this Sabaton video?
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=f6npKLMK9fo