StangStung wrote:
CAPFlyer wrote:
Tom - 5 posts up Mark gives the name.

As for the Lex- as it was technically scuttled (by 5 torpedoes from the USS
Phelps) and not sunk, then there would be an argument against it being considered a war grave. However, I don't think anyone would want to salvage much more than a few small items and maybe one or two of the planes on the sea floor nearby.
As for why recover a TBD or the F4F - simple - they're actual early war aircraft in extremely good shape that would require only stabilization after recovery and then display as-is. No need to "restore" them, just display them.
My question wasn't "why recover a TBD or F4F", my question was very specific: Why recover THESE TBDs, when there are three documented at MUCH easier attainable depths, that also have war history (especially the two in Jaluit)?
As a corollary, is there any reason to believe the Navy would salvage these as opposed to the ones that would (seemingly) require less resources to go after?
I would say it is because these deep examples are in MUCH, MUCH better condition that the "easier" recoveries. The ones at scuba depths have essentially become part of the coral reef, and while depth may be easy, recovery is not easy. They are encrusted in marine growth and will likely come apart in brittle little bits and would exfoliate immediately upon surfacing if not given an extensive bath period (years). They are really easily restorable/preservable. These deep birds have a chance with careful recovery and preservation.
I think a private/public relationship might have a chance, with the precedence of the Titanic discovery and the few fresh water recoveries done with Navy permission. After Ballard found the USS Scorpion debris he used spare time to find the Titanic. Maybe if Mr. Allen finds the C-2, the Navy would be willing to let him recover a few of these. Navy has been less enthused (politely phrased) about private folks recovering Navy artifacts for their private collections.