Nathan wrote:
I really can't see a group having a large interest in aviation history to be everything bad. I can't see anyone going through the trouble of researching something for years to be part of a scam. I can't see them originally starting out that way.
Nathan(the worried)
Nathan,
As the Brits would say, "you're a good ol' chap". But, I think you are making a couple of assumptions.
1. They don't have a large interest in aviation history. They have a large interest in making
money. (See my other post about what YOUR $50,000 can do.)
2.And it's not research. Why would any joe schmoh, off the street, be accepted as part of a
serious research effort? Why? Because he has (had) $50K in his wallet.
3. As far as scams... they use sensationalist tactics to generate interest. 'we found a piece of aluminum with a rivet spacing the same as the Electra'. That same rivet pattern can probably be found on a hundred other aircraft. But, it generates intrigue. Never mind that
Gardner Island was inhabited throughout WWII by the US Navy operating a LORAN station.
No telling what kind of junk that generated during the war. Mind you this RESEARCH fact has never been mentioned by TIGHAR. (Too my knowledge). The shoe, the bones (that have since disappeared but, were examined by another doctor who said that... blah,blah,), eyewitnesses that can't be found, shoe, zipper pull. Zipper pull!!-- I got a big laugh with the Wix thread on that one.
Like Warbird1, I used to be a supporter of TIGHAR in it's early years. And I agree with Warbird1, corporate sponsors enjoy the advertising even if real evidence is not found.
It's the hype that bothers me, too. How much pre-publicity hype was produced before that
Corsair was raised from Lake Michigan recently? Little, if none. They just went and did it.
I've got more to say but, I think most of it has already been well said by others.
Paul