Warbird Information Exchange

DISCLAIMER: The views expressed on this site are the responsibility of the poster and do not reflect the views of the management.
It is currently Sat Jun 07, 2025 3:49 pm

All times are UTC - 5 hours


Classic Wings Magazine WWII Naval Aviation Research Pacific Luftwaffe Resource Center
When Hollywood Ruled The Skies - Volumes 1 through 4 by Bruce Oriss


Post new topic This topic is locked, you cannot edit posts or make further replies.  [ 295 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7 ... 20  Next
Author Message
PostPosted: Mon Jan 17, 2011 11:17 pm 
Offline
2000+ Post Club
2000+ Post Club
User avatar

Joined: Thu Mar 03, 2005 5:54 pm
Posts: 2593
Location: VT
me109me109 wrote:
To start, I love re-enactors and their presence at airshows. It adds a lot to the aircraft to have an accurate or at least semi-accurate representation of those who flew and maintained these machines back in the day. Do I care if every button is correct or that the reenactor may be wearing incorrect skivvys under his/her uniform, no. Should they strive to be accurate, yes. I have been a part of a couple 101st Abn. reenactions and have met many reenactors at airshows (I love the guys that come to Midland!) and I have never met anyone who talks down on those who aren’t 100% accurate. All of the men and women I have met have just been enthused that someone else shares their same passion even if they can't find or afford all of the nitpicky items that makes their appearance perfect. They would rather encourage a kid wearing an oversized M1943 and a garrison cap, than critique someone whose unit insignia is 1/2" off the regs.

That being said, when I restored my L-5G in the colors of the 1st Cav. Div. I did so because I had the original uniform and items from a 1st Cav. pilot (who I have contacted and is still living) and as luck would have it, the uniform fit me perfectly. I thought wearing his uniform while the aircraft was being judged would be a great tribute to this Captain and would also add much to my display as a whole. Well.... a couple weeks after Oshkosh I received an anonymous email from a fellow WIXer not only talking down about my restoration, but insinuating that my wearing of the uniform, or the way I was wearing it, was not in good taste or was dishonorable. So, what is the protocol? Are pilots/owners not supposed to wear re-enacting equipment? Am I incorrect to assume I was honoring a man who I held in high enough respect to model my plane after?

I have learned over my brief existence on Earth that some people have too much time on their hands and have nothing better to do than degrade the efforts of others. My intentions have never been anything but honoring the sacrifices of those who enable me to live in a free world.

Just thought I'd see if I was really in the wrong or get other WIXers opinion on the subject...


Taylor, there is always one!! I have one that I used to work with, gave me crap about it all the time. He is just one out of 300. He was in the Navy, I only wish that someday someone will learn about what he did cause his history will just disapear.

Keep preserving the history taylor!!! Over 300 truckers support me.
Image
Image

_________________
Long Live the N3N-3 "The Last US Military Bi-Plane" 1940-1959
Badmouthing Stearmans on WIX since 2005
Image


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Jan 17, 2011 11:20 pm 
Offline
3000+ Post Club
3000+ Post Club
User avatar

Joined: Fri Apr 30, 2004 2:29 pm
Posts: 4527
Location: Dallas, TX
me109me109 wrote:
Just thought I'd see if I was really in the wrong or get other WIXers opinion on the subject...

Taylor,

Come with your L-5 to some airshow with me and we'll both wear our uniforms... :twisted:. Maybe do some formation, too. Just have to figure out how to get a demo team deal.

Ryan

_________________
Aerial Photographer with Red Wing Aerial Photography currently based at KRBD and tailwheel CFI.
Websites: Texas Tailwheel Flight Training, DoolittleRaid.com and Lbirds.com.

The horse is prepared against the day of battle: but safety is of the LORD. - Prov. 21:31 - Train, Practice, Trust.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Jan 17, 2011 11:38 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri Oct 28, 2005 10:46 pm
Posts: 612
Location: Arizona
Heck BOTH of you guys should come to Midland in October for the show. We should have Gena put you guys over by us!

Scott

_________________
Scott Dunkirk
AZGCLHU Inc.

http://arizonagroundcrew.org/

1940's Army Air Force ground crew living history
(A 501 C 3 organization)
(IYAMYAS)

"Yes sir, it's suppose to look like that"


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Jan 17, 2011 11:55 pm 
Offline
1000+ Posts!
1000+ Posts!
User avatar

Joined: Thu Jul 01, 2004 6:11 pm
Posts: 1917
Location: Pacific Northwest USA, via North Florida
Jarink1 wrote:
If the uniforms are appropriate to the plane, vehicles, or show then I think they're great.
Can anyone explain the difference between wearing old style uniforms and painting a restored warbird in something other than its original paint job? Look at 99% of the planes in the registry here. How many of them are painted as a different (historical) plane? They didn't 'earn' the markings they're wearing, did they?
In both cases it's a matter of honoring the history. This is especially true for the many "data plate" restorations where there's absolutely nothing on or in the plane that flew with that serial number or paint job in WWII.
WELL SAID! But this is an argument that will never die.
I’ve been into that hobby starting with Revolutionary War when I was 5, Civil War when I was 7, various other time periods over the years and WW2 since 1989. In all that time, I have never ONCE encountered any WW2 vet who had an issue with people wearing the uniforms if done correctly. So I have to ask, if the vets themselves are fine with it, why should anyone else not be?
To me, it’s to show the public what the stuff looked like that they often will never see in person otherwise, and hope they get an understanding of the material aspect of what the vets used, rode in and shot with. I did serve in real life but since I never served in WW2, I feel no more right to wear these uniforms than anyone who didn’t serve.
I have never understood why so many warbird people dislike re-enactors so much. I have always thought it stems from the fact that re-enactors often get their photos taken in front of the planes at shows when the real crews often don’t because they’re not dressed “the part” for the spectators’ taste. The public at a show likes as much of a wide range of relevant stuff to see as possible. They equally love to see WW2 vehicles near the planes as well. The public loves to have other things to look at when at air shows and we get all kinds of compliments. I have never heard once anyone ask why we’re there. I have given up understanding why some airplane owners don’t (or can’t) understand this. Maybe it’s the same reason some operators won’t take their aircraft to an event if they’re not the main draw for the public and don’t want to share the spotlight? Beats me.
What about all the photos I’ve seen over the years from photo shoots of WW2 planes airborne with the pilots in correct gear? I’d bet the people here with issues would find some kind of odd hippocratic reasoning for that being a pilot instead of a re-enactor and how that would be okay.
Image

We were asked by the MoF in Seattle to show up for this event in 2003, I’m front row right:

Image

Our camp at Olympia two years ago:

Image

My display there a few years ago:

Image

_________________
Life member, 91st BG Memorial Association
Owner, 1944 Willys MB #366014
Former REMF (US Army, O3)


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Jan 18, 2011 12:10 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri Oct 28, 2005 10:46 pm
Posts: 612
Location: Arizona
I think another aspect is attitude. If someone comes up and says "We are going to climb all over your airplane and get photos" then walks away and really doesn't get the owners permission that tends to cause MAJOR issues. We always clear EVERYTHING with the owners of the aircraft so there are no issues. PLUS as many of us are around aircraft so much we don't "stumble around" the aircraft into unsafe areas or do "something stupid" to the aircraft.

Scott

_________________
Scott Dunkirk
AZGCLHU Inc.

http://arizonagroundcrew.org/

1940's Army Air Force ground crew living history
(A 501 C 3 organization)
(IYAMYAS)

"Yes sir, it's suppose to look like that"


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Jan 18, 2011 1:23 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sun May 02, 2004 3:57 am
Posts: 926
mustangdriver wrote:
jet1 wrote:
....one night after the show we went to a hanger party/dance/dinner. All was well until a group of guys came in dressed in Nazi SS uniforms (there were other folks dressed in both US and german uniforms) When Lefty saw them he said "whats wrong with those guys, the ss were just a bunch of murdering b@st@rds" (I remember it to this day) We got up and left....the end.


California Nazis, I hate California Nazis.



I hate them darn California Nazis almost as much as I hate them Illinois Nazis! I feel yer pain.

_________________
"WHAT ME WORRY?"


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Jan 18, 2011 4:12 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Mon Jan 05, 2009 5:44 pm
Posts: 966
Location: Seattle, WA
What I see here is the same argument that so many people seem to make whenever a warbird painted in (varying) authentic paint schemes shows up with a swastica on the tail. By god, how could someone paint that on there when it stands for an organization that killed millions? We hear that all the time on this board, and debate it to death.

I, for one, have never had a problem with it...nor do I have an issue with someone 'reenacting' the SS. Does that mean I agree with what the SS stood for? Not at all. I don't agree with what the Nazi party stood for either...but I would be pissed if I had an authentic BF-110 and all anyone did was bitch about the swastica on the tail and accuse me of being a Nazi. Censoring history to the lowest common demoninator by turning your back on it because you don't like it is a bad habit to get into.

Is it offensive? Good. Then use it to educate and remind others never to let it get to that level again. I'm not suggesting to glorify them (and I don't know the people who do it...someone mentioned their maturity level)...but I am saying that to be properly informed on history, you need to be able to see all sides of it.

"Never forget" isn't just one-sided.

Alright...back into my hole.

Chicoartist wrote:
I concur with the above comments in regards to the SS genre of "reenactor".

As most here know, the SS was not subject to the Wehrmacht chain of command. They were a completely separate heavily armed and well trained force reporting directly to Hitler's Nazi Party. As such, they (as demonstrated by their actions) generally considered themselves outside the 'rules of war'. The Tulle hangings and Oradour-sur-Glane massacres of mostly women and children by 2nd SS Panzer are but two examples of this sadistic, brutal force of thugs - not soldiers. And don't forget the Allied prisoners executed by the SS. Yes, by definition atrocities were committed by all sides - but the SS embraced pillage and cold-blooded murder as open SOP! They are worthy of nothing but derision and contempt, not "reenacting". There -are- contextual reasons for a film actor to dress up and "play SS", but in my opinion you simply can't justify walking around and wearing that crap - and what it represents - as part of any volunteer personal-collection airshow reenacting to "honor history".

Wade

_________________
Offer me solutions, offer me alternatives, and I decline......


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Jan 18, 2011 4:42 pm 
Offline
1000+ Posts!
1000+ Posts!
User avatar

Joined: Mon Jun 28, 2004 8:54 pm
Posts: 1388
Location: Beautiful, Downtown Danvers, MA
I am an airshow spectator re-enactor.
You will see me at airshows sitting in my chair in Shorts and a T-shirt. Looking the same as 20+ years ago.
Not the same Shorts and T-shirt as years ago, I wish I could fit into those ones again.

I think the reenactors do a great job, I like taking pics of them when I can, but its not for me.
I am way too comfy in those same shorts and t-shirt to get all covered up in wool and burlap.

I got a ration of crap years ago for wearing a tag on my flightsuit that was not mine.
I have no need to go there again, especially over a joke tag, just like everyone else in our group had.

My name tag had one of those WIX inapropriate names with the rank of SWAB and a set of Navy aircrew wings.

_________________
"Hindsight is usually 20% off!"


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Jan 18, 2011 4:45 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sun May 02, 2004 3:57 am
Posts: 926
Like it or not ,The Nazi's and their version of the swastika(not the first) existed.you cannot just sweep this fact under the rug.To paint an aircraft accurately,it must include a swastika. They did and do exist.To ignore this fact is infantile. People who try to ignore these facts are the same people who depend on The Disney corp to teach them true history.Thanks to Disney,I know the truth about the"Pirates of the Carribean."They were a bunch of happy-go lucky guys who were just having fun,getting drunk and eating lots of food.And not murderous thugs, rapists and social misfits. Thanks for setting me straight Walt! If you want to know the truth about history,you must accept the truth. all blemishes included,whether pleasant or not.
you cannot pick and choose what parts you do and dont like.this is what they call censorship,I believe

_________________
"WHAT ME WORRY?"


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Jan 18, 2011 5:03 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Mon May 11, 2009 11:36 am
Posts: 569
Location: Shalimar, FL
I agree that the SS were terrible; but, I also agree that to sweep them under the rug is absurd. It happened. It's interesting to note the comments of ones maturity level pertaining to those who reenact SS. It sort of corresponds to those who were IN the REAL SS. Look at the biographies of their leaders. They were two-bit thugs who jumped at an opportunity to rise to power.

I reenacted for several years. My one big complaint is that if you're going to "honor" the vets, do so correctly. I stopped for two reasons.
(1) I was getting too old to be portraying what I was doing
(2) I gained weight after several knee surgeries that took me out of "fighting trim"

How many real WW II infantry (Regardless of country) were overweight, over 40 years old etc.... Few if any other than senior officers or NCO's -- and then usually REMFs.

Don't wear medals you earned in the Air Force, Coast Guard, Navy, USMC, Army, CAP, ROTC, that weren't authorized or in existence during the time period you represent.

Don't even think that you are a real soldier and try to tell real soldiers what to do. Don't say it doesn't happen as I've seen them do it and had it done to me when I was Active Duty. I had a reenacting buddy of mine, regardless of the number of times we asked him NOT to do it, wore his Class A WWII uniform while traveling on an airliner!

Reenactors can add a lot to an airshow. Just do it right. Get a hair cut, shave that big mustache/beard and lose weight.

I'm prepared for the flak!

_________________
Cheers!

Lance Jones


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Jan 18, 2011 8:04 pm 
Offline
3000+ Post Club
3000+ Post Club
User avatar

Joined: Sun Feb 12, 2006 9:58 pm
Posts: 3282
Location: Nelson City, Texas
No SS uniforms or Flags, no Swastikas!!! Probably the same a__ holes that won't let the CAF be the CONFEDERATE AF anymore or wear the Rebel Flag. I went to RE Lee High School and they had to change history and get rid of the Confederate Flag also.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Jan 18, 2011 8:25 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sun May 02, 2004 3:57 am
Posts: 926
The Confederate airforce?
dont get me started.This organization was founded by a bunch of good ol boys from the southern states of these now United States.They had the foresight to see the value and great fun of aircraft that others saw as nothing more than future beer cans and refrigerators.They eventually had to bow down to the politically correct influences inorder to get money to keep these potential beer cans flying.If this isn't a case of reverse discrimination,I dont know what is.I refuse to call them the"Commerative airforce" They are nand will always be the "Confederate airforce" to me.at one time these good ol boys had one of the largest airforces on the planet. maybe the planes were obsolete,but they flew.if you wanted to drop a "little boy"bomb on some poor atoll,they flew the only delivery system(Fifi)

_________________
"WHAT ME WORRY?"


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Jan 18, 2011 8:40 pm 
Offline
Long Time Member
Long Time Member
User avatar

Joined: Tue May 11, 2004 5:42 pm
Posts: 6884
Location: The Goldfields, Victoria, Australia
Obergrafeter wrote:
No SS uniforms or Flags, no Swastikas!!! Probably the same a__ holes that won't let the CAF be the CONFEDERATE AF anymore or wear the Rebel Flag. I went to RE Lee High School and they had to change history and get rid of the Confederate Flag also.

Interesting juxtaposition against jet1's earlier post in this thread:
Quote:
I was with Lefty Gardner at a show in Madera cal one night after the show we went to a hanger party/dance/dinner. All was well until a group of guys came in dressed in Nazi SS uniforms (there were other folks dressed in both US and german uniforms) When Lefty saw them he said "whats wrong with those guys, the ss were just a bunch of murdering b@st@rds" (I remember it to this day) We got up and left....the end.

Can't get much more CAF than Lefty, can you?

_________________
James K

"Switch on the underwater landing lights"
Emilio Largo, Thunderball.

www.VintageAeroWriter.com


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Jan 18, 2011 8:54 pm 
Offline
2000+ Post Club
2000+ Post Club
User avatar

Joined: Sat Jun 05, 2004 3:37 pm
Posts: 2755
Location: Dayton, OH
Here in Ohio we had a guy this past election lose his run for Congress over Reenacting:


Rich Iott http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Rich_Iott

Quote:
War reenactment group controversy

Iott received national media attention in October 2010 when it was reported in The Atlantic that he was a former member of a World War II reenactment group that portrays the Nazi 5th SS Panzer Division Wiking. The Atlantic also published two pictures of Iott dressed as an SS officer that were replicated virally on the internet and by other news sources.[19][25] Iott told The Atlantic that his interest was historical and that he absolutely does not agree with the tenets of Nazism.[19] He said he joined because reenactments were a hobby and a father-son bonding experience, and that he has participated in a range of reenactments over the years including as a Union Army soldier in the American Civil War, and as American soldiers in World War I and II.[19] Iott's campaign said the candidate had not engaged in any reenactments for about five years.[5] According to the Toledo Free Press, Iott joined the group in 2002 and was listed on the membership rolls through 2008.[26] In response to the ensuing criticism, Iott said he never intended disrespect towards anyone through his reenactments,[27] and later said the story was a coordinated character assassination attempt by his opponent to distract from the issues.[10] Swastikas were found painted on several of Iott's campaign lawn signs on October 13, with Iott accusing the Kaptur campaign of "inciting these hateful actions".[28]
A Holocaust survivors' group said that Iott's wearing of the SS uniform was "disgraceful", and the Republican Jewish Coalition called Iott unfit for office.[29] A local rabbi predicted the reaction would be negative and would not be limited to Jewish people.[30] The JTA News Service noted that Iott has not apologized.[29] Some Republican leaders have attempted to distance themselves from Iott in the wake of the controversy.[31] House Republican whip Eric Cantor told Fox News that he repudiated and did not support Iott's actions.[31] The National Republican Congressional Committee removed Iott from its website list of preferred "contenders".[29][32] A Jewish friend and movie business partner of Iott offered a defense, calling Iott one of the most pro Jewish and pro Israel people he knows.[33] Toledo City Councilman Rob Ludeman said he was not withdrawing his support of Iott because of one incident in the past.[34] The Lucas County GOP chief continued to back Iott, emphasizing that the county Republican Party organization does not condone Nazis, and adding the claim that this was nothing more than politically motivated mudslinging and an attempt to split the party.[35] U.S. House Minority Leader John Boehner continued to solicit funds for Iott's campaign through his Freedom Project PAC.[36] A Freedom Project spokesman said Boehner was not concerned about the reenactments turning off voters or donors.[36]



Shay
_____________
Semper Fortis


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Jan 18, 2011 11:10 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri Oct 28, 2005 10:46 pm
Posts: 612
Location: Arizona
That just shows how ignorant the common public is. They were having a fit over him portraying German? I think that's so much crap.

Scott

_________________
Scott Dunkirk
AZGCLHU Inc.

http://arizonagroundcrew.org/

1940's Army Air Force ground crew living history
(A 501 C 3 organization)
(IYAMYAS)

"Yes sir, it's suppose to look like that"


Top
 Profile  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic This topic is locked, you cannot edit posts or make further replies.  [ 295 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7 ... 20  Next

All times are UTC - 5 hours


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Google [Bot], Google Adsense [Bot] and 312 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group