This is the place where the majority of the warbird (aircraft that have survived military service) discussions will take place. Specialized forums may be added in the new future
Sat Apr 27, 2013 6:35 pm
Coast Guard scheme is fine with me ... sharp looking indeed
Sat Apr 27, 2013 8:50 pm
DOUBLE POST
Last edited by
C VEICH on Sun Apr 28, 2013 2:46 pm, edited 1 time in total.
Sat Apr 27, 2013 9:41 pm
Photo by Robert K. via Wallace Tharp.
C VEICH wrote:
Sun Apr 28, 2013 2:05 pm
I like the USCG scheme- especially since it will be true to the aircraft's actual history.
Chappie
Mon Apr 29, 2013 3:03 pm
Its a clean machine! regardless of how it is painted or not painted I am loving it! Now, when can I get the owners to bring her up here to Wendover!?
Tom P.
Mon Apr 29, 2013 4:14 pm
Chappie wrote:I like the USCG scheme- especially since it will be true to the aircraft's actual history.
Chappie
And accurate if it doesn't have any/all of the wartime turrets.
Why paint it in wartime scheme when it won't be correct?
Mon Apr 29, 2013 4:20 pm
Mark Allen M wrote:Coast Guard scheme is fine with me ... sharp looking indeed

Mark a series on the NAVY PB4Y Liberator and NAVY/CG PB4Y2 Privateer would be great.
Fri May 17, 2013 8:57 am
I suppose it's too late for a vote for a PB4Y-2K (QP-4B) scheme

.
That would get everyone's attention.
Wed Sep 25, 2013 8:38 pm
Cool in flight shot, but the smoke ring on the last is really neat!
Chappie
Wed Sep 25, 2013 9:35 pm
Chappie wrote: the smoke ring on the last is really neat!
Always better to see a ring of smoke, than one of fire... so sayeth the poor fellow with the small fire bottle...
Thu Sep 26, 2013 12:08 am
Bubak wrote:
It's a good start.
Powered by phpBB © phpBB Group.
phpBB Mobile / SEO by Artodia.