Warbird Information Exchange

DISCLAIMER: The views expressed on this site are the responsibility of the poster and do not reflect the views of the management.
It is currently Sat Jun 28, 2025 6:35 pm

All times are UTC - 5 hours


Classic Wings Magazine WWII Naval Aviation Research Pacific Luftwaffe Resource Center
When Hollywood Ruled The Skies - Volumes 1 through 4 by Bruce Oriss


Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 70 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2, 3, 4, 5  Next
Author Message
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Tue Aug 18, 2009 10:02 pm 
Offline

Joined: Sun May 02, 2004 4:40 pm
Posts: 175
Location: Everett WA
Boeing F8B would be nice.
Norm


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Tue Aug 18, 2009 10:25 pm 
Offline
3000+ Post Club
3000+ Post Club
User avatar

Joined: Sun Nov 07, 2004 2:02 am
Posts: 4702
Location: Yucca Valley, CA
...three pages and no Airacuda or Maxim Gorky? :rolleyes:

_________________
Image
All right, Mister Dorfmann, start pullin'!
Pilot: "Flap switch works hard in down position."
Mechanic: "Flap switch checked OK. Pilot needs more P.T." - Flight report, TB-17G 42-102875 (Hobbs AAF)


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Tue Aug 18, 2009 11:15 pm 
Offline

Joined: Tue Oct 24, 2006 9:47 pm
Posts: 69
Location: Melbourne, FL
I'll see your Maxim Gorky (ANT-20... but not the -20bis, too easy!) and raise you a Kalinin K-7!!!!

How about an authentic replica of the golden-age dirigibles? Los Angeles, Graf Zeppelin, Hindenburg, etc... OF COURSE with a squadron of replica biplanes to launch from underneath!

Come to think of it... can you imagine building an XF-88 Goblin parasite fighter? The FAA might ground you for starting that one, on mental illness grounds!


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Wed Aug 19, 2009 5:56 am 
Offline
2000+ Post Club
2000+ Post Club
User avatar

Joined: Fri Apr 30, 2004 8:11 am
Posts: 2391
Location: Montreal, Quebec, Canada
Quote:
Pretty good guess that there will be no more Stratalinas!


There is something to be said about unique "airworthy ?" survivors.

The XB-70 is still around.....so it only would be resto...right :roll: :wink:

I'd go with the YB-49 also......just for sheer complexity.

BTY...love the bumps of the past few dazed


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Wed Aug 19, 2009 10:41 am 
Offline
2000+ Post Club
2000+ Post Club
User avatar

Joined: Thu Sep 23, 2004 3:00 pm
Posts: 2148
Location: Utah
Michel - you get the Valkriye and I'll be the first in line to volunteer! that would be one incredible fly-by at an air show eh?

Tom P.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Wed Aug 19, 2009 11:05 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Jan 03, 2008 6:36 pm
Posts: 654
Location: Scotland
wendovertom wrote:
Michel - you get the Valkriye and I'll be the first in line to volunteer! that would be one incredible fly-by at an air show eh?

Tom P.


Wow, that would be a sight to see. Who would chip in for the fuel though!!! :shock:

_________________
If the first casualty of war is innocence, the second is sobriety - Hawkeye.
Good people do not need laws to tell them to act responsibly, while bad people will find a way around the laws - Plato.
Lies get halfway round the world before the truth has a chance to get it's pants on - Churchill
If you are going through he11 - keep going - Churchill


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Vickers Wellington
PostPosted: Wed Aug 19, 2009 11:17 am 
Offline
Long Time Member
Long Time Member
User avatar

Joined: Sun Oct 10, 2004 4:43 pm
Posts: 7501
Location: northern ohio
AndyG wrote:
I'd imagine that scratchbuilding a Wellington Scott, with its geodetic construction would be quite a challenge at any price. They reproduced a lot of fuselage on the Brooklands 'Loch Ness' one, though that was only a static.

FYI: For those who collect the metal Corgi Aviation Archive in 1:72 scale, they have just released a Wellington. Very nice too. The Liberator is fine and dandy too.

Antone else like to confess to a Corgi habit? ;-)


i agree, the wimpy wellington

_________________
tom d. friedman - hey!!! those fokkers were messerschmitts!! * without ammunition, the usaf would be just another flying club!!! * better to have piece of mind than piece of tail!!


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Wed Aug 19, 2009 6:03 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Mon Nov 21, 2005 10:50 am
Posts: 237
wendovertom wrote:
Resurrecting this thread -

XB-70
XF-85 goblin
YB-49 (Jack was right!)

Tom P.


If talking semi Modern birds (semi like the B-70) where you have to start from scratch - (tooling, materials, fab processes, analytical design teams, etc) the B-70 and the SR 71 and X-15 do come to mind... honeycomb, titanium forgings, etc, etc.



WWII - I can't imagine anything any more complicated to build from scratch than the B-29, although there have been several 'equals' mentioned


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Wed Aug 19, 2009 6:04 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Mon Nov 21, 2005 10:50 am
Posts: 237
wendovertom wrote:
Resurrecting this thread -

XB-70
XF-85 goblin
YB-49 (Jack was right!)

Tom P.


If talking semi Modern birds (semi like the B-70) where you have to start from scratch - (tooling, materials, fab processes, analytical design teams, etc) the B-70 and the SR 71 and X-15 do come to mind... honeycomb, titanium forgings, etc, etc.



WWII - I can't imagine anything any more complicated to build from scratch than the B-29, although there have been several 'equals' mentioned


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Wed Aug 19, 2009 6:13 pm 
Offline
3000+ Post Club
3000+ Post Club

Joined: Fri Jun 24, 2005 7:26 pm
Posts: 4969
Location: PA
B-36 of course. Im still gonna make one flying when I win the lotto. :wink: :roll: :twisted:

_________________
Shop the Airplane Bunker At
www.warbirdbunker.com


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Wed Aug 19, 2009 7:26 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri Mar 27, 2009 5:30 pm
Posts: 472
Location: Dallas/Fort Worth Texas
My vote is for the XB-70 followed by B-58 and I would love to see a B-52D with the tall tail and black belly flying in an airshow!

_________________
Bill Gorin
Vintage Flying Museum
http://www.vintageflyingmuseum.org
https://www.facebook.com/#!/group.php?gid=57513906106


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Wed Aug 19, 2009 7:48 pm 
Offline
2000+ Post Club
2000+ Post Club
User avatar

Joined: Fri Apr 30, 2004 8:11 am
Posts: 2391
Location: Montreal, Quebec, Canada
Have to ask....ressurect means.....????

From the ashes ? Nada....none exist

Or

Take something that we still have but has been sitting around for a long time ?

Huge difference.

I would think restoring a B36 to fly would be much simpler than recreating a B32 from scratch..no ?


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Wed Aug 19, 2009 8:31 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sat Oct 29, 2005 7:01 pm
Posts: 744
I think the most difficult would be the R6V Lockheed Consitution based on the sheer complexity and rarity.

_________________
Kevin Kearney
Vice President
Berlin Airlift Historical Foundation


C-54D "Spirit of Freedom" 43-17228
C-97 "Angel of Deliverance" 52-2718 (painted as YC-97A 45-59595)
C-54E/R5D-4 "Spirit of Freedom" 44-9144 BuNo 90414 (wfu April/2020)
http://www.spiritoffreedom.org


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Thu Aug 20, 2009 12:51 am 
Offline

Joined: Tue Oct 24, 2006 9:47 pm
Posts: 69
Location: Melbourne, FL
Actually, the ultimate in scratch-built Warbird complexity would have to be the Space Shuttle... not only would you have to build the vehicle and launch stack, but also build up all the infrastructure!

Although, maybe a 1/20 scale replica could work... with of course a scaled-down 747 to launch it from... hehehe

There's a guy building a homebuilt, scaled-down B-17... way cool, although if I were him and serious enough to actually tackle such a project, I would have jumped 2 logical steps beyond, and done a 2-seat B-36... proportions might not scale so well as the B-17, though.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Thu Aug 20, 2009 8:00 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Mon Nov 21, 2005 10:50 am
Posts: 237
Merlin_FAC wrote:
Actually, the ultimate in scratch-built Warbird complexity would have to be the Space Shuttle... not only would you have to build the vehicle and launch stack, but also build up all the infrastructure!

Although, maybe a 1/20 scale replica could work... with of course a scaled-down 747 to launch it from... hehehe

There's a guy building a homebuilt, scaled-down B-17... way cool, although if I were him and serious enough to actually tackle such a project, I would have jumped 2 logical steps beyond, and done a 2-seat B-36... proportions might not scale so well as the B-17, though.


I would think any 'scale down' has to consider the engine as the most important criteria - than scale from physical dimension/plumbing required for engine system to maintain scale and lines.


Top
 Profile  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 70 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2, 3, 4, 5  Next

All times are UTC - 5 hours


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: MKD1966 and 12 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group