retroaviation wrote:
Okay, I can't lurk any longer here.
Gary,
I've also seen it mentioned that the other B-23 that is for sale in California is a much better deal since it's a flyer. Well, that depends on what your definition of a better deal is. It hasn't flown in several years....why?.....I'm told that it's corrosion issues. Sure, that's just heresay, but my guess is that it's true. Either way, corrosion is a major enemy on B-23's.
Nothing really more for me to say here on this, so I'll go back to lurking.
Gary
Hi Gary,
The B-23 out in Calif. hasn't flown since 1994. We stopped flying the aircraft for one reason. It wasn't for corrosion or mechanical reason's. The owners wife wanted her house they were building, finished as they had been living in a trailer for 5 years. So, we had to stop playing with the B-23 until the house was finished. Unfortunately, the owner passed away before we got the house done. So, that is why the aircraft has been sitting. There are some corrosion issue's that have to be fixed though, before it can fly again. I know that the CAF's B-23 has been described as a lump of corrosion with a data plate on it. I haven't seen it, but one of our former pilot's has seen it and that was his description. We last ran the engines in 2002. Suprisingly she ran pretty good.
This is not heresay.
Wayne , former crew chief, B-23 N747M