Glyn wrote:airnutz wrote:helinut wrote:It also looks like a aouette11, there is no rotor cowl and the nose wheel sloops rearward unlike a s-51, the cabin area is too rounded and low to be a 51
Maybe an Alouette III, but the mast looks too tall. Remember, the camera is panning so some
distortion of the background is occurring. Most likely an S-51.
No, the exposed engine would have been visible had it been an Alouette III. I would bet real money that the helicopter in question is the favoured Dragonfly.

...of course your assuming I hadn't considered the turbine had been removed.
My point was, if it was an Alouette, it would be a III rather than a II. Other clues...mainly the
mast height and the exposed uncowled transmission with its supporting tubular trusswork pose
a significantly different silouette than the other suggestions. The rectangular louvered
ventilation section, midway just forward of the main LG, was the other biggy pushing me to ignore
the exagerrations of a blurred photo to believe it had to be Sikorsky S-51.
Alouette III has 1-tube trailing main LG with 1 fuse oleo strut...S-51 has a 2-tube V-main LG strut(faired
over and coated with non-skid for a work footing) with 1 oleo strut to the fuse, as other Wixers alluded to.
Of course, some Smart A will show up shortly with a story of some yayhoos custom project of installing
S-51 running gear into an Alouette III fuse...with 500 8x10 color glossy photographs..with circles and arrows..
blowing my reasoning outta the water!
Edit: Alouette III photo for comparison...
www.fas.org/man/dod-101/sys/ac/row/alouette-3_07.jpg