Warbird Information Exchange

DISCLAIMER: The views expressed on this site are the responsibility of the poster and do not reflect the views of the management.
It is currently Fri May 09, 2025 2:29 pm

All times are UTC - 5 hours


Classic Wings Magazine WWII Naval Aviation Research Pacific Luftwaffe Resource Center
When Hollywood Ruled The Skies - Volumes 1 through 4 by Bruce Oriss


Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 24 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2
Author Message
PostPosted: Mon Oct 31, 2022 11:16 pm 
Offline
2000+ Post Club
2000+ Post Club

Joined: Wed May 05, 2004 3:45 pm
Posts: 2628
C VEICH wrote:
quemerford wrote:
Those are beautiful shots - that F-38 canopy is similar to the two-seater which was used for laminar flow research.


I would hazard to say that it is not only similar but, in fact, the very same aircraft.


Yes it is. I posted all of that information in the 4th post.

_________________
45-47=-2


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Thu Nov 03, 2022 11:05 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Apr 09, 2008 9:48 pm
Posts: 841
Location: Pittsburgh, PA
Correctly if I am wrong BUT according to the 1947 Sectional chart Whiteman Airport had a 3300 foot runway. I cannot imagine that all of those heavy aircraft (e.g. B-45 Tornado, C-69 constellation, C-54 Skymaster et.al) would risk attempt a landing on such a short airfield. Looking at the mountain range in the background I am under the impression that these aircraft were located at nearby Burbank. The last few photos of privately owned light aircraft may well have indeed been photographed at Whiteman in Pacoima. BTW, todays Whiteman airport runway has been lengthened to 4100 ft.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Thu Nov 03, 2022 7:15 pm 
Offline
2000+ Post Club
2000+ Post Club

Joined: Wed May 05, 2004 3:45 pm
Posts: 2628
jdvoss wrote:
Correctly if I am wrong BUT according to the 1947 Sectional chart Whiteman Airport had a 3300 foot runway. I cannot imagine that all of those heavy aircraft (e.g. B-45 Tornado, C-69 constellation, C-54 Skymaster et.al) would risk attempt a landing on such a short airfield. Looking at the mountain range in the background I am under the impression that these aircraft were located at nearby Burbank. The last few photos of privately owned light aircraft may well have indeed been photographed at Whiteman in Pacoima. BTW, todays Whiteman airport runway has been lengthened to 4100 ft.


Yes, Burbank was mentioned in previous posts as well.

_________________
45-47=-2


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Fri Nov 04, 2022 11:00 am 
Offline
1000+ Posts!
1000+ Posts!
User avatar

Joined: Fri Mar 06, 2015 9:48 pm
Posts: 1102
Location: West Valley, Silicon Valley
mike furline wrote:
Anyone notice the F-38 #5266 early chin intakes and odd canopy, X9 under left wing?
http://www.warbirdregistry.org/p38regis ... 12048.html
http://www.warbirdinformationexchange.o ... =3&t=66054

<>

N91300, with a survey nose
Attachment:
civilLightning344.jpg
civilLightning344.jpg [ 81.28 KiB | Viewed 2915 times ]

pop2

_________________
remember the Oogahonk!
old school enthusiast of Civiltary Warbirds and Air Racers


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Nov 08, 2022 11:40 pm 
Offline
2000+ Post Club
2000+ Post Club

Joined: Tue Jun 14, 2005 10:16 am
Posts: 2304
JimH wrote:
The P-47 on display is now in the collection of the Yanks Air Museum. It was flown by Bill Odom as the Reynolds Bombshell...ended up with Earl Rienert before Yanks. I've flown over Whiteman Airport hundreds of times over the years. It looked too small to fit all these airframes. I would guess the 'airshow' photos were taken at Burbank. that's just a guess, some of the mountains match up with images from google maps. I also had a look at Whiteman through the lens of historicaerials.com...there is only one small hangar on the field circa 1952. These are absolutely magnificent photos...a real time portal.

Jim

The large hangar with the peeling paint sure looks like one of the Pacific Airmotive hangars that used to be either side of the terminal at BUR & predated it.

Image

_________________
Those who possess real knowledge are rare.

Those who can set that knowledge into motion in the physical world are rarer still.

The few who possess real knowledge and can set it into motion of their own hands are the rarest of all.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed Nov 09, 2022 9:00 am 
Offline
Long Time Member
Long Time Member

Joined: Fri Feb 03, 2012 1:48 pm
Posts: 7802
Yes, it’s Burbank in the pics with the larger aircraft.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed Nov 09, 2022 3:37 pm 
Offline
1000+ Posts!
1000+ Posts!

Joined: Mon May 21, 2012 12:28 pm
Posts: 1195
Is F-86 "7613" the actual world speed holder of the time? I note the sign and the faired over gun ports.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed Nov 09, 2022 11:32 pm 
Offline

Joined: Sat Feb 07, 2009 12:05 pm
Posts: 913
Location: ELP
sandiego89 wrote:
Is F-86 "7613" the actual world speed holder of the time? I note the sign and the faired over gun ports.


The gunports are not faired over. Early F-86As had doors over the gunports that would open only when the guns fired. The idea was that they would thereby reduce drag but as they did not always open when they should they were done away with on later F-86A Sabres and subsequent F-86s.

_________________
Had God intended for man to fly behind inline engines, Pratt & Whitney would have made them.

CB

http://www.angelfire.com/dc/jinxx1/Desrt_Wings.html


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Thu Nov 10, 2022 11:17 am 
Offline
1000+ Posts!
1000+ Posts!

Joined: Mon May 21, 2012 12:28 pm
Posts: 1195
Clifford Bossie wrote:
sandiego89 wrote:
Is F-86 "7613" the actual world speed holder of the time? I note the sign and the faired over gun ports.


The gunports are not faired over. Early F-86As had doors over the gunports that would open only when the guns fired. The idea was that they would thereby reduce drag but as they did not always open when they should they were done away with on later F-86A Sabres and subsequent F-86s.


Thank you! was not aware of the gun doors on early A's.


Top
 Profile  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 24 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2

All times are UTC - 5 hours


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: dred, Google [Bot] and 268 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group