Hooligan2 wrote:
OD/NG wrote:
Their CAA requirements in England are much less stringent than FAA requirements here in the States. That does not mean they are less safe, just less regulations and red tape to deal with.
That's the first time I've ever seen the CAA described as less stringent/less regulations/red tape than the FAA - usually people say "look how easy it is to do so and so with an aircraft in America compared to the requirements here in the UK".

As I think has already been mentioned, it's only in the last decade or so that we British have at last been allowed to buy rides in such aircraft, for which opportunity much thanks.
Yep, it hasn't always been like that, and previously that was the case. The FAA keeps "moving the goal-posts" for their rules on warbird passenger flights and after the last major rewrite, the rules are more strict than the U.K. ones according to one of my acquaintences who flies a Spitfire over there.
The one exception, however, is flying fast, tactical jets. It is still easier here in the States to do that, especially after the Hunter accident in the U.K. a few years back.