Ol Paint wrote:
Saville wrote:
shrike wrote:
Back in Ye Olden Dayes of Usenet, Erik was a regular on a few of the boards. I second the nice guy part, but also remember him being merciless with know-it-alls.
I remember one ...uhhh disagreement.... he had with Dan Ford - author of a book on the AVG - over which version of the P-40 the AVG flew and whether or not they had self-sealing fuel tanks.
The CW-21, by the way, did not have self-sealing tanks according to Shilling.
I ran across this archive of Usenet postings a long time back (circa 2001-2004) that have some posts by Erik Schilling. Some of which appear to be parts of the discussions you reference.
https://yarchive.net/mil/p40.htmlhttps://yarchive.net/mil/ford_book.htmlhttps://yarchive.net/mil/avg_record.htmlhttps://yarchive.net/mil/avg_tactics.htmlSome other postings that were archived:
https://yarchive.net/mil/kill_claims.htmlhttps://yarchive.net/mil/bell_yfm1_horrors.htmlThe CW-21 sounded like an interesting aircraft. Too bad there don't appear to have been any survivors or much readily available information on how it actually stacked up against its contemporaries.
Doug
That's a trip down memory lane. I recall one quick exchange (clouded by the years perhaps) where someone was talking about, "This airplane was this pilot's, and that plane was so-and-so's" when Erik gently corrected him, pointing out that while they may have flown one or another more often, no one was actually assigned to a given airframe, and availability and pilot rosters meant that they often flew whatever was handy.
The OP claimed to have read every book ever about the Flying Tigers, 'What the hell do you know?'
The reply was simply, "I had to sign for them", followed by an expanded signature with most of his career spelled out.