Lon Moer wrote:
Sabremech wrote:
Lon Moer wrote:
No, I really mean it.
Not my money, not my airplane - the owners can do what they want.
But now its just another blue Corsair like all the rest and it's uniqueness and historical significance has been lost.

It’s uniqueness and historical significance has been lost? It’s short and poor racing history pales in comparison to its military history. Knowing what I know of the racing modifications, this airplane was heading towards disaster if it had been raced with the last modifications that were done and thankfully never flown with.
The only thing you got right in your statement is that the owner can do what they want.
Lon Moer wrote:
Oh yay, another civilian warbird air racer turned into a blue Corsair.

Yes, another Blue Corsair. Thats where its real history is and its value.
T J Johansen wrote:
Without arguing about how much racing history actually constitutes historical significance, I'm with Lon on this one. Bob Mitchem is a part of racing history, both with his FG-1D and Harvard. Sad to see it emerge as "just another FG-1D". To me seeing it as #94 in Bob Axtell's hangar in Denver in 92 will always be worth more than seeing it fly in its new guise in the future. And I normally prefer airplanes that fly!
T J
It has very little racing history and would not have been much of regular flyer with its racing modifications. Not practical in any way to fly it regularly the way it was modified. Thankfully this airplane did not race with the big wing cut as in this photo like when we received it as it definitely would have been a smoking hole because of the ailerons.
Thankfully it will be a regular flyer versus sitting in a hangar. How often do you see any of the real historic Reno race aircraft flying? Not often and their value some day in the not too distant future will be in their original configuration versus the race configuration.