Sopwith wrote:
Yes I'd like to know how they compare to the real thing too with regards handling and performance. I appreciate that the wing is wooden but do you know if it has the same wing section and washout as the genuine article? Some very fine looking workmanship going into it, what a fantastic project. Do you know who in England the plans came from, was it Clive Du Cross?
Thanks for posting all the pictures, really nice to see.
Being 2,000lbs lighter but almost the same power, it should beat the real spit 9 in just about every performance category.
From my understanding, the plans were drawn up using old technical drawings but are optimized for wood construction. The website for Spitfire aircraft company is listed in my last reply.
DH82EH wrote:
One question that came to mind is, why are the control surfaces being covered with alloy instead of the usual fabric?
Andy Scott
The plans call for all wooden controls on the tail, but after building the frames but before sheeting them, he decided to make them all out of metal instead.
Ryan Harris wrote:
Bob DeFord's replica (the one in the photo) is not 75%. It is 1:1 size with an Allison up front. No way an Allison could fit in a 3/4 scale Spitfire. The DeFord replica uses Jurca plans.
when I looked up the registration number and saw the manufacturer, I went to there site. But I only saw the 75% listing. It wasn't until today I noticed they also had a 1:1.