Warbird Information Exchange

DISCLAIMER: The views expressed on this site are the responsibility of the poster and do not reflect the views of the management.
It is currently Mon Jun 16, 2025 10:33 pm

All times are UTC - 5 hours


Classic Wings Magazine WWII Naval Aviation Research Pacific Luftwaffe Resource Center
When Hollywood Ruled The Skies - Volumes 1 through 4 by Bruce Oriss


Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 42 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2, 3  Next
Author Message
PostPosted: Tue Apr 30, 2013 9:31 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sat May 26, 2012 10:27 pm
Posts: 491
Location: Orlando FL
tom d. friedman wrote:
hopefully the usaf museum will cherry pick some of the aircraft slated for removal from the downsizing of the warner robbins museum in Georgia. how does 1 museum downsize while another grows?? it's like talking out of both sides of your mouth. I thought this sequestration / castration was across the board. I realize the usaf museum is oz for all of us, but come on!! the Georgia museum was certainly not a truckstop!!


Georgia Museum was already getting picked at the bones before Sequestration became a word in our vocabulary. I was there in January and already some planes that used to be there were gone like that English Electric Lightning and some were about to get moved like the B-57. I am glad I got there when I did. It is a great museum and hopefully they can keep it going. What is happening to the EC-121, EC-135 and C-124? There are only a handful of any Connies left, hate to see the EC-121 broken up. The only C-124s I know of are this one, Pimas and AFM and I believe one out in Nebraska some where.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Apr 30, 2013 3:44 pm 
Offline

Joined: Tue May 24, 2011 6:46 pm
Posts: 112
BK wrote:
myteaquinn wrote:
Does anyone know if there will be elevated viewing platforms in this building. It sure gives a different perspective on the aircraft when you look down on them. By the way what does the LN stand for?


Learning Node:
http://www.nationalmuseum.af.mil/shared ... 30-002.jpg
http://www.nationalmuseum.af.mil/shared ... 47-001.jpg



Thank you for the information BK


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed May 01, 2013 7:50 am 
Offline
1000+ Posts!
1000+ Posts!

Joined: Mon May 21, 2012 12:28 pm
Posts: 1198
Boeing666 wrote:
tom d. friedman wrote:


. The only C-124s I know of are this one, Pimas and AFM and I believe one out in Nebraska some where.



B666, wiki shows 10 C-124 survivors, some in better shape than others. Hope this one survives as well.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Douglas_C- ... emaster_II


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed May 01, 2013 9:01 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sat May 26, 2012 10:27 pm
Posts: 491
Location: Orlando FL
sandiego89 wrote:
Boeing666 wrote:
tom d. friedman wrote:


. The only C-124s I know of are this one, Pimas and AFM and I believe one out in Nebraska some where.



B666, wiki shows 10 C-124 survivors, some in better shape than others. Hope this one survives as well.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Douglas_C- ... emaster_II



They probably will end up keeping it. From what I heard they were only keeping planes that had to do with being based there or Georgia aviation. They did have C-124s based at Warner Robbins according to the Wiki article.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sun May 12, 2013 9:09 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Dec 15, 2010 6:20 am
Posts: 83
Thanks for posting that link, Pat. With such a crowded hall it will still be a challenge to take good photos of the exhibits, however. If the museum were to park the current inmates of the Presidential hall outside for just a couple of weeks while moving them, I'd make a serious effort to be there.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon May 13, 2013 4:58 pm 
Offline
Long Time Member
Long Time Member
User avatar

Joined: Mon May 03, 2004 5:42 pm
Posts: 5747
Location: Waukegan,Illinois
XL446 wrote:
Thanks for posting that link, Pat. With such a crowded hall it will still be a challenge to take good photos of the exhibits, however. If the museum were to park the current inmates of the Presidential hall outside for just a couple of weeks while moving them, I'd make a serious effort to be there.

Hopefully the lighting in the new building will be 1,000% better than the lighting in the Cold War Gallery.

_________________
Ain't no sunshine when she's gone!


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue May 14, 2013 12:16 am 
Offline

Joined: Mon Mar 11, 2013 6:06 pm
Posts: 150
Location: Kalamazoo, MI
Quote:
Hopefully the lighting in the new building will be 1,000% better than the lighting in the Cold War Gallery.


I love the dramatic lighting within the Cold War gallery. Really allows a unique view of all of the aircraft. :) Very rewarding for photos too (a tripod is an absolute must...)!


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed May 15, 2013 12:34 am 
Offline
1000+ Posts!
1000+ Posts!
User avatar

Joined: Sat Oct 07, 2006 9:24 pm
Posts: 1748
Location: atlanta,georgia
sandiego89 wrote:
Does anyone know if a specific C-5 Galaxy has been picked for display yet? Hopefully a Vietnam, Isreali lift, Gulf war I and II vet. I vote for a paint job in the early delivery C-5A scheme of gray and white- best looking by far. Current gray is a boring and Euro One cammo was ugly. I assume the C-141C is the Hanoi Taxi. Love the trash haulers!

They need to pull the plug out of the Hanoi taxi to make her right.It just aint the same bird the way she is now.

_________________
Hang The Expense


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed May 22, 2013 7:09 pm 
Offline
Long Time Member
Long Time Member
User avatar

Joined: Mon May 03, 2004 5:42 pm
Posts: 5747
Location: Waukegan,Illinois
Well nothing is written in stone except in the Flinstones. Plans for the layout in the new building have changed. The C-5, the KC-135 and the C-39 (I was definately looking forward to seeing this plane on display) are out and many planes from the Research and Development hangar are in. www.nationalmuseum.af.mil/shared/media/ ... 30-003.jpg

_________________
Ain't no sunshine when she's gone!


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed May 22, 2013 7:25 pm 
Offline
3000+ Post Club
3000+ Post Club

Joined: Thu Dec 21, 2006 8:32 am
Posts: 4331
Location: Battle Creek, MI
They probably want to get as much of the contents of the old Annex hangars over to the main campus as possible..that way they won't have to worry about security briefings and shuttle buses and such, except for the "Behind The Scenes" tours (once the sequester is over.)

I'm thinking they'll have to ravamp/expand the WWII gallery once they get The Swoose finished..maybe the C-39 could go in there. Does anyone know where the Ju-52 ended up? I wonder if they'll divest themselves of the Spanish He-111 as well.

SN


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed May 22, 2013 7:36 pm 
Offline
Long Time Member
Long Time Member
User avatar

Joined: Mon May 03, 2004 5:42 pm
Posts: 5747
Location: Waukegan,Illinois
Steve Nelson wrote:
They probably want to get as much of the contents of the old Annex hangars over to the main campus as possible..that way they won't have to worry about security briefings and shuttle buses and such, except for the "Behind The Scenes" tours (once the sequester is over.)

I'm thinking they'll have to ravamp/expand the WWII gallery once they get The Swoose finished..maybe the C-39 could go in there. Does anyone know where the Ju-52 ended up? I wonder if they'll divest themselves of the Spanish He-111 as well.

SN

Will the sequester actually end someday?

_________________
Ain't no sunshine when she's gone!


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed May 22, 2013 7:57 pm 
Rob W wrote:
Quote:
Hopefully the lighting in the new building will be 1,000% better than the lighting in the Cold War Gallery.


I love the dramatic lighting within the Cold War gallery. Really allows a unique view of all of the aircraft. :) Very rewarding for photos too (a tripod is an absolute must...)!


To each his own I guess.......I'll take brighter lighting any time. The allowance of daylight such as they have at the Udvar-Hazy in Northern Virginia is much better in my opinion than the dim lighting in the AF Museum buildings.


Top
  
 
PostPosted: Wed May 22, 2013 11:32 pm 
Offline

Joined: Mon Mar 11, 2013 6:06 pm
Posts: 150
Location: Kalamazoo, MI
Quote:
Well nothing is written in stone except in the Flinstones. Plans for the layout in the new building have changed. The C-5, the KC-135 and the C-39 (I was definately looking forward to seeing this plane on display) are out and many planes from the Research and Development hangar are in. http://www.nationalmuseum.af.mil/shared ... 30-003.jpg


That layout looks much more intriguing than what was originally planned. Quite a bit more to look at in there, plus the addition of many of "X" planes. +1 in my opinion! :-D


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Thu May 23, 2013 6:19 pm 
Offline
Long Time Member
Long Time Member
User avatar

Joined: Mon May 03, 2004 5:42 pm
Posts: 5747
Location: Waukegan,Illinois
I agree but I think having a C-5 inside as originally planned would have been pretty darn kool.

_________________
Ain't no sunshine when she's gone!


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Thu May 23, 2013 9:06 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sun Jun 07, 2009 1:13 pm
Posts: 671
Location: Indiana
Steve Nelson wrote:
Does anyone know where the Ju-52 ended up?
SN


I know it had been up for sale and I noticed it was gone from the airpark on my last trip. The museum website now says that it's in storage, but it looks like the page was last revised in January of last year.

http://www.nationalmuseum.af.mil/factsh ... asp?id=785

_________________
Image


Top
 Profile  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 42 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2, 3  Next

All times are UTC - 5 hours


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 300 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group