Warbird Information Exchange

DISCLAIMER: The views expressed on this site are the responsibility of the poster and do not reflect the views of the management.
It is currently Sun May 11, 2025 10:51 pm

All times are UTC - 5 hours


Classic Wings Magazine WWII Naval Aviation Research Pacific Luftwaffe Resource Center
When Hollywood Ruled The Skies - Volumes 1 through 4 by Bruce Oriss


Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 21 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2
Author Message
 Post subject: Re: B-29's ...
PostPosted: Mon Dec 17, 2012 4:35 pm 
Offline
Long Time Member
Long Time Member

Joined: Sat Dec 22, 2007 12:36 am
Posts: 7961
Location: Mt. Vernon, WA.
The heat treated KB-50 was 48053, B-50-75-BO converted to KB-50J to MASDC 2/4/65
The B-29 with the trashed #4 nacelle and missing prop looks to be a NACA or early NASA mother plane and looks to be configured to haul either the X-2 or the D-558-2 SKYROCKET from the stabilizing braces.

_________________
Don't make me go get my flying monkeys-


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: B-29's ...
PostPosted: Mon Dec 17, 2012 9:22 pm 
Offline
Long Time Member
Long Time Member

Joined: Fri Feb 03, 2012 1:48 pm
Posts: 7802
Image
Col Paul Tibbetts in front of the EnolaGay

Image
B-29 crew photo taken Aug 11 1945 two days after the Nagasaki mission (US Air Force photo)

_________________
“Knowing what’s right, doesn’t mean much unless you do what’s right.”


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: B-29's ...
PostPosted: Mon Dec 17, 2012 10:43 pm 
Offline
2000+ Post Club
2000+ Post Club
User avatar

Joined: Wed Jun 27, 2007 10:23 pm
Posts: 2343
Location: Atlanta, GA
The picture below the X-1 shows what appears to be a KB-29M of the 55th Strategic Recon Wing lifting off at Ramey AFB, PR. The "V" on the fin was the 55th.

_________________
"Take care of the little things and the big things will take care of themselves."


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: B-29's ...
PostPosted: Tue Dec 18, 2012 9:21 am 
Offline
1000+ Posts!
1000+ Posts!

Joined: Mon May 21, 2012 12:28 pm
Posts: 1196
[quote="Mark Allen M"[/img]http://i1303.photobucket.com/albums/ag145/Mark_Allen_M2/BoeingB-29crewphototakenAug111945twodaysaftertheNagasakimissionNotethereisnonoseartontheaircraftUSAirForcephoto_zpsdacda924.jpg[/img]
B-29 crew photo taken Aug 11 1945 two days after the Nagasaki mission (US Air Force photo)[/quote]

I have a question about this photo, while I have no reason to question the accuaracy of the hand drawn date, it does not like like the terrain on Tinian for what I recal. I have flown over Tininian. To me it looks very much like Wendover, UT. Perhaps this is this Sweeney's C-15 crew in front of the Great Artiste while in Wendover? Happy to be corrected- I just do not recal any mountians like that on Tinian, and the buildings look like Wendover as well. Bockscar did a brief stop in Okinawa for fuel after the Nagasaki delivery, but doubt this photo was taken there. Thoughts? Tinian? Wendover?

Love these pictures- thank you for posting. Especially like the 1946 Enola Gay, never knew she carried "Buzz Numbers" in '46. Perhaps this was in the gear up for Operation Cross Roads.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: B-29's ...
PostPosted: Tue Dec 18, 2012 9:29 am 
Offline
2000+ Post Club
2000+ Post Club
User avatar

Joined: Mon Feb 13, 2006 9:42 pm
Posts: 2707
Location: NP, NJ, USA
sandiego89 I suspect you are correct. I'd guess that the picture was taken at Wendover and the caption was added to indicate that the crew pictured flew the Nagasaki mission.

_________________
Share your story: Rutgers Oral History Archive http://oralhistory.rutgers.edu/


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: B-29's ...
PostPosted: Tue Dec 18, 2012 1:27 pm 
Offline
3000+ Post Club
3000+ Post Club
User avatar

Joined: Fri Mar 02, 2007 6:52 pm
Posts: 3410
Location: Wichita Falls, Texas, USA
Craig59 wrote:
CAPFlyer wrote:
I'm pretty sure the 3rd picture is post-war. Several sources show "Circle-R" as being 9th Bombardment Wing (Heavy) based out of Mountain Home AFB with B-29's and RB-29's from 1949 to 1954 before converting to the B-47 Stratojet. Additonal clues this is a post-war photo are the B-36 left wing on the far right of the picture (1 full engine pod and one blade of the #2), and the C-74 Globemaster I immediately behind the B-29 featured. Also visible is another B-29, a C-46, a C-47, an F-86, F-84, and a P-80/T-33. With all that, I suspect the picture was taken in 1951 or 1952. I'm pretty sure that Enola Gay was already preserved at this point, so this is another airframe.


Perhaps a B-29 used in the circa 1951 Tibbets biopic, "Above and Beyond?"


Possibly, but I suspect it's just a line B-29 that they took a "press pic" of at an airshow/open house somewhere in the United States judging by the varied types.

VaBeachEd wrote:
You could be right, and I don't disagree that it's post war. While I was absent the day they taught imagery interpretation in school, I don't see the jet pod on the outboard wingtip of the aircraft on the far right of the pic that does indeed look like a B-36 - at least from the engine nacelles, which is about all you can see. That may of course, make it a very early model before they added the jets to that underpowered beast.


First, the addition of the jet pods wasn't due to the plane being underpowered. It was to give it additional dash speed over the target as fighter and missile technology began to catch up with the B-36's extremely (for the time) high altitude capabilities. They were used on takeoff to allow for a bigger conventional bomb load to be carried from the existing runways, but for their original mission, the six R4630's provided more than enough power. Second, the pods were first added with the B-36D model in 1949, however they were delivered between 1949 and 1951. The already built B-36A and B-36B aircraft were then converted between mid-1951 and late 1952. So it's likely this aircraft is an early B-36A or B-36B that hadn't been sent through conversion yet or the date on the photo is slightly earlier than I suspected and is closer to the 1949/1950 timeframe when the F-86 had just been introduced instead of 1951/1952.


Top
 Profile  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 21 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2

All times are UTC - 5 hours


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Noha307 and 325 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group