wendovertom wrote:
P51 - I have heard that statement about having "no one around to complain" before to.
I am on the fence on this topic. I can see the justification for leaving it there if the crew, or crew members, perished in the crash. But I can also see recovering what can be recovered. When I saw the B-17 wreckage that started this all, I saw the ball turret components and immediately thought, "Those would make a great basis for a reconstruction of a ball turret display for the museum!" And again, on this forum - what about the P-51 engine and wings that were pulled from the German bog recently when "Dallas Lady" was recovered? it would be a shame to see them scrapped.
Tom P.
On ships I can see not pillaging the wrecking since there are remains there (I am OK with on the Hood taking the bell for a memorial), but on aircraft wreckage I would assume the remains of the crew have been recovered. If not, what about cars where someone died but the vehicle is fixable, or a home where someone died, or even a piece of road where someone died?
If the remains have been recovered, I would think that would eliminate the question. Now the questions would be should we not take trinkits to save the site for future generations? Another point would be how much longer would the aircraft remains last where they are? I would be for recovery for display in a museum.