Warbird Information Exchange

DISCLAIMER: The views expressed on this site are the responsibility of the poster and do not reflect the views of the management.
It is currently Fri May 02, 2025 4:35 pm

All times are UTC - 5 hours


Classic Wings Magazine WWII Naval Aviation Research Pacific Luftwaffe Resource Center
When Hollywood Ruled The Skies - Volumes 1 through 4 by Bruce Oriss


Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 47 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2, 3, 4  Next
Author Message
PostPosted: Sun Feb 13, 2011 11:46 am 
Offline
Account Suspended
User avatar

Joined: Wed Nov 14, 2007 3:06 pm
Posts: 2713
whistlingdeathcorsairs wrote:
i thought that the chin turret was swung so it would not interfere side with the bomb site during a bomb run. Also, to clean and take the guns out, it had to be swung to the side. I thought i read that somewhere but i could be off


Yes, you read it on this page :shock: :wink: :rolleyes:

I have never heard of them impeding the bombsite.

_________________
S.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sun Feb 13, 2011 2:20 pm 
Offline
2000+ Post Club
2000+ Post Club
User avatar

Joined: Sat Apr 11, 2009 5:28 am
Posts: 2008
Location: massachusetts
the330thbg wrote:
whistlingdeathcorsairs wrote:
i thought that the chin turret was swung so it would not interfere side with the bomb site during a bomb run. Also, to clean and take the guns out, it had to be swung to the side. I thought i read that somewhere but i could be off


Yes, you read it on this page :shock: :wink: :rolleyes:

I have never heard of them impeding the bombsite.


oops! Didn't see your post :oops: I thought there was controlles inside that swing to the side so the bombadier could use his site?

_________________
" I am a nobody in aviation, but somebody to my family."


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sun Feb 13, 2011 4:24 pm 
Offline
Account Suspended
User avatar

Joined: Wed Nov 14, 2007 3:06 pm
Posts: 2713
There is nothing on the turret to interfere with the bombing function of the aircraft.

_________________
S.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sun Feb 13, 2011 5:36 pm 
Offline
2000+ Post Club
2000+ Post Club
User avatar

Joined: Sat Apr 11, 2009 5:28 am
Posts: 2008
Location: massachusetts
the330thbg wrote:
There is nothing on the turret to interfere with the bombing function of the aircraft.


thank you for the correct information. where are the controls located to operate the chin turret?

_________________
" I am a nobody in aviation, but somebody to my family."


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sun Feb 13, 2011 6:12 pm 
Offline
1000+ Posts!
1000+ Posts!
User avatar

Joined: Wed Aug 18, 2010 12:51 pm
Posts: 1185
Location: Chandler, AZ
the330thbg wrote:
There is nothing on the turret to interfere with the bombing function of the aircraft.


Except for the bombardier and nose gunner sharing the same seat and identity.
The nose turret controls have to be swung out of the way of the bombsight, and the guns would have to be centralized or traversed to one side so as not to block the sights view.

Here's another cockpit 360 http://www.jansmadesign.net/tour_aircraft_detail.cfm?id=33

_________________
Lest Hero-worship raise it's head and cloud our vision, remember that World War II was fought and won by the same sort of twenty-something punks we wouldn't let our daughters date.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Feb 14, 2011 1:28 am 
Offline

Joined: Fri Oct 08, 2010 11:16 am
Posts: 90
Location: Winnipeg, MB
Great information, Guys.

I presume the expended links and cases were ejected from the turret. Does anyone have any pictures or drawings showing where they were ejected? Thanks.

Ron


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Feb 14, 2011 10:31 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sun Jun 08, 2008 10:26 am
Posts: 550
Location: Northants, UK
They were ejected through the two central slots on the underside of the turret, visible in the330thbg's first photo upthread:

the330thbg wrote:
Image


All the best,
PB

_________________
Paul Bellamy

401BG Association Historian & Honorary Life Member
401BG Historical Society (UK) Member
1st Air Division HQ Historical Society (UK) Founder Member
Director of Archives & Collections, Airfield Research Group Archive, Alconbury
RAF Alconbury Base Historian


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Feb 14, 2011 10:53 am 
Offline
Account Suspended
User avatar

Joined: Wed Nov 14, 2007 3:06 pm
Posts: 2713
.., and as you can see in the above shot., there is no part of the chin turret (barring the guns) from blocking the bombsight. The turret controls would have to be pivoted out of the way and the guns centered. But the turret housing would not interfere with the site.

_________________
S.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Feb 14, 2011 6:33 pm 
Offline
1000+ Posts!
1000+ Posts!
User avatar

Joined: Sun Feb 18, 2007 12:39 pm
Posts: 1817
Location: Irving, Texas
With the guns pointed forward they could interfere with the bombsight if the plane was flying in a severe crosswind. The sight does swivel for aiming purposes.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Feb 14, 2011 7:01 pm 
Offline
Account Suspended
User avatar

Joined: Wed Nov 14, 2007 3:06 pm
Posts: 2713
also if the B-17 was upside down they could interfere as well. :rolleyes:

_________________
S.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Feb 14, 2011 7:38 pm 
Offline
1000+ Posts!
1000+ Posts!
User avatar

Joined: Wed Aug 18, 2010 12:51 pm
Posts: 1185
Location: Chandler, AZ
I stand corrected on the possible intrusion of the gun muzzles into the sight picture. Given the origin of the turret in the YB-40, it wouldn't have surprised me if it did.
I do maintain though, that the sharing of hands, eyeballs and seat would have interfered with multi-tasking.

I wonder if the turrets seen traversed to the side during a bomb-run are there result of swinging the turret controls away while still powered up.

_________________
Lest Hero-worship raise it's head and cloud our vision, remember that World War II was fought and won by the same sort of twenty-something punks we wouldn't let our daughters date.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Feb 14, 2011 10:38 pm 
Offline
Account Suspended
User avatar

Joined: Wed Nov 14, 2007 3:06 pm
Posts: 2713
shrike wrote:
I stand corrected on the possible intrusion of the gun muzzles into the sight picture. Given the origin of the turret in the YB-40, it wouldn't have surprised me if it did.
I do maintain though, that the sharing of hands, eyeballs and seat would have interfered with multi-tasking.

I wonder if the turrets seen traversed to the side during a bomb-run are there result of swinging the turret controls away while still powered up.


Wasn't the bombardier and the nose gunner the same person? I know in a B-29 the bombardier also had optional control on 6 of the 12 .50's. I can't imagine the Navigator, gunner and Bombardier climbing all over each other in the nose of a B-17. I believe it was the Nav and Bombardier who operated the guns in the nose.., that is all. Not much room up there! :wink:

_________________
S.


Last edited by the330thbg on Tue Feb 15, 2011 9:06 am, edited 1 time in total.

Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Feb 15, 2011 12:57 am 
Offline
1000+ Posts!
1000+ Posts!
User avatar

Joined: Wed Aug 18, 2010 12:51 pm
Posts: 1185
Location: Chandler, AZ
the330thbg wrote:
shrike wrote:
I stand corrected on the possible intrusion of the gun muzzles into the sight picture. Given the origin of the turret in the YB-40, it wouldn't have surprised me if it did.
I do maintain though, that the sharing of hands, eyeballs and seat would have interfered with multi-tasking.

I wonder if the turrets seen traversed to the side during a bomb-run are there result of swinging the turret controls away while still powered up.


Wasn't the bombardier and the nose gunner the same person? ..... Not much room up there! :wink:


I think that was rather my point to begin with<G>

_________________
Lest Hero-worship raise it's head and cloud our vision, remember that World War II was fought and won by the same sort of twenty-something punks we wouldn't let our daughters date.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Feb 15, 2011 4:21 pm 
Offline
2000+ Post Club
2000+ Post Club
User avatar

Joined: Sat Apr 11, 2009 5:28 am
Posts: 2008
Location: massachusetts
b29flteng wrote:
With the guns pointed forward they could interfere with the bombsight if the plane was flying in a severe crosswind. The sight does swivel for aiming purposes.


ahhhh. so i was right. thanks for setting us straight :D

_________________
" I am a nobody in aviation, but somebody to my family."


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Feb 15, 2011 4:30 pm 
Offline
Account Suspended
User avatar

Joined: Wed Nov 14, 2007 3:06 pm
Posts: 2713
whistlingdeathcorsairs wrote:
b29flteng wrote:
With the guns pointed forward they could interfere with the bombsight if the plane was flying in a severe crosswind. The sight does swivel for aiming purposes.


ahhhh. so i was right. thanks for setting us straight :D

Image
no, mate, not quite :? .., look at the photo and determine how the guns would interfere with the bombsite if they were pointed forward. I have never seen a photo nor a video of a 17 with a chin gun going in over a target with them pointed anywhere but straight ahead. I would imagine that was their 'default' position. In other words if you shut them down, they would track to being straight ahead.

The bombsite is located just above that flat piece of glass in the nose(looking out of the curved pieces of plexi would deflect the image and totally mess up the run)So not off to either side.., but on the centerline of the A/C. The bombsite would only pivot so far...,. just through that centerline.., which is in line with the bombay for a reason.

The guns would centerline.., the bombardier would swing those controls out of the way and pivot over his bombsite for his next job. Then once that was done, he would pivot the bombsite out of the way and go back to keeping the bad guys from making nose runs on his aircraft.

The only crosswinds severe enough to crab a bomber sideways over the target would be the jetstreams that the first B-29's encountered when they first started bombing Japan. Actually, that is how they discovered the Jetstream was with the B-29.

_________________
S.


Last edited by the330thbg on Tue Feb 15, 2011 4:56 pm, edited 3 times in total.

Top
 Profile  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 47 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2, 3, 4  Next

All times are UTC - 5 hours


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Google [Bot] and 320 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group