Juke wrote:
The XVIII is relatively new in the BILTEMA fleet. Is it a lot more demanding to fly in a small field than a IX for instance ?
Certainly there's a lot of relevant factors to suggest so; longer, heavier more powerful aircraft, different engine thrust line (lower, IIRC) five hefty prop blades rather than four narrower ones, and the Griffon turning the prop the other way than on the Merlin. There's a much bigger fin and rudder to deal with the greater torque and there's the 'P Factor' which would be, I understand, greater too.
That said, the Griffon Spitfire was designed to operate from grass as the earlier Merlin versions were, but those were all over grass air
fields rather than grass
runways with the advantage that either a diversion from a straight line wouldn't take you off a 'runway' and that you could take off and land
directly into wind, not 'nearly' as often required by modern runway orientation.
(I'm not a pilot, nor expert, and that's not speculating on the cause/s of this crash, just design and operation aspects relating to the question.)
Regards,