Warbird Information Exchange

DISCLAIMER: The views expressed on this site are the responsibility of the poster and do not reflect the views of the management.
It is currently Sat Mar 28, 2026 1:35 am

All times are UTC - 5 hours


Classic Wings Magazine WWII Naval Aviation Research Pacific Luftwaffe Resource Center
When Hollywood Ruled The Skies - Volumes 1 through 4 by Bruce Oriss


Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 20 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2
Author Message
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Mon Nov 09, 2009 1:15 am 
Offline
2000+ Post Club
2000+ Post Club

Joined: Tue Jun 14, 2005 10:16 am
Posts: 2309
bdk wrote:
Also, since the aircraft is certified in the Limited category, I think a PMA applies just like for a Lycoming or Continental.

One could also argue that he isn't selling duplicate parts, but improved parts.


Even the Roush piston rings have PMA #'s on them... :)

_________________
Those who possess real knowledge are rare.

Those who can set that knowledge into motion in the physical world are rarer still.

The few who possess real knowledge and can set it into motion of their own hands are the rarest of all.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Mon Nov 09, 2009 1:53 am 
Offline
2000+ Post Club
2000+ Post Club

Joined: Fri Sep 21, 2007 6:25 pm
Posts: 2760
Serious question for all of you. Now, don't take this as a slight against Roush, as I know his reputation is superb and he has the best engines in the biz. Has anybody ever done any kind of statistical analysis or a database survey of exactly how many or what percentage of Roush over-hauled engines have had catastrophic engine failures in them after Roush's overhaul? I know Rouch engines are the best, how how much better are they? Are there any statistics to prove this or is it just born out by anecdotal evidence? What about TBO times on the Roushs? How are they compared to non-Roush engines? I'm interested to know if anybody has done any serious study of this.

Lotsa questions! :)


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Mon Nov 09, 2009 9:04 am 
Offline
2000+ Post Club
2000+ Post Club
User avatar

Joined: Wed Jun 27, 2007 10:23 pm
Posts: 2348
Location: Atlanta, GA
I'm guessing that the Roush motors haven't been out there long enough to have a meaningful statistical data point. A good friend and highly experienced warbird pilot who has toured the facility commented on how detailed and well-run the place seemed to be. He also commented on the Roush team's work on improving parts, experimenting with different spark plugs (that Jack would fly himself), etc. Time will tell, but they appear to be doing a first rate job.

And, from the thread title, I was expecting to see a T-38 .....

_________________
"Take care of the little things and the big things will take care of themselves."


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Mon Nov 09, 2009 9:39 am 
Offline
2000+ Post Club
2000+ Post Club
User avatar

Joined: Sat Oct 04, 2008 6:57 pm
Posts: 2716
Location: St Petersburg FL, USA
My brother-in-law, a Master Ford Mechanic, got to tour the Roush facility a couple years ago and came away very impressed with that shop. They seem to be doing a lot of cutting edge stuff with that 70 year old technology.

_________________
Image
Aviation Illustration Website
http://shepartstudio.com/illustration/


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Mon Nov 09, 2009 10:00 am 
Offline
2000+ Post Club
2000+ Post Club

Joined: Tue Jun 14, 2005 10:16 am
Posts: 2309
warbird1 wrote:
Serious question for all of you. Now, don't take this as a slight against Roush, as I know his reputation is superb and he has the best engines in the biz. Has anybody ever done any kind of statistical analysis or a database survey of exactly how many or what percentage of Roush over-hauled engines have had catastrophic engine failures in them after Roush's overhaul? I know Rouch engines are the best, how how much better are they? Are there any statistics to prove this or is it just born out by anecdotal evidence? What about TBO times on the Roushs? How are they compared to non-Roush engines? I'm interested to know if anybody has done any serious study of this.

Lotsa questions! :)

I'd be more intersted in who built the engine the first time using old parts...

_________________
Those who possess real knowledge are rare.

Those who can set that knowledge into motion in the physical world are rarer still.

The few who possess real knowledge and can set it into motion of their own hands are the rarest of all.


Top
 Profile  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 20 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2

All times are UTC - 5 hours


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Google Adsense [Bot] and 180 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group