Warbird Information Exchange

DISCLAIMER: The views expressed on this site are the responsibility of the poster and do not reflect the views of the management.
It is currently Fri Aug 15, 2025 10:02 am

All times are UTC - 5 hours


Classic Wings Magazine WWII Naval Aviation Research Pacific Luftwaffe Resource Center
When Hollywood Ruled The Skies - Volumes 1 through 4 by Bruce Oriss


Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 30 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2
Author Message
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Sun Oct 04, 2009 9:58 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Tue Mar 10, 2009 6:29 pm
Posts: 683
Location: Chapel Hill, NC
That's not a "warship" - it's a standard model "PEACEKEEPER"

If it had been an advanced model "Peacekeeper", it would have also had concentric red circles painted on it. :shock:

(It's my thread and I'll digress if I want to....)


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Sun Oct 04, 2009 10:00 am 
Offline
3000+ Post Club
3000+ Post Club
User avatar

Joined: Fri Mar 02, 2007 6:52 pm
Posts: 3413
Location: Wichita Falls, Texas, USA
Quick sidebar -

Rajay wrote:
He also gave me points for painting it black. Star Trek always got it wrong! In space, why in the heck would you paint a warship WHITE?


For the same reason the Space Shuttle and ISS are white - temperature regulation.

In space, paint doesn't matter. Most of where combat would be taking place, actual ability to see would be negligible without serious image enhancement, and then in reality, color wouldn't matter as much. What you are worried about more is heat dissipation from internal to mask your ship from IR detection and reflecting as much of the external heat as possible to allow for proper regulation of the internal temperature.

Okay, back to the original subject, I've seen a couple of models of this "Rutan B-17" online in the past and they always looked interesting, especially how some solved the landing gear issues. I think someone even attempted to build an RC model of it, but I can't find it anymore. Can't remember if it worked or not either, although with most RC models, success of the RC version has no bearing on if the real thing would work due to the very different lift/drag ratios and thrust/weight ratios.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Sun Oct 04, 2009 10:22 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Tue Mar 10, 2009 6:29 pm
Posts: 683
Location: Chapel Hill, NC
CAPFlyer wrote:
Quick sidebar -

Rajay wrote:
He also gave me points for painting it black. Star Trek always got it wrong! In space, why in the heck would you paint a warship WHITE?


For the same reason the Space Shuttle and ISS are white - temperature regulation.

In space, paint doesn't matter. Most of where combat would be taking place, actual ability to see would be negligible without serious image enhancement, and then in reality, color wouldn't matter as much. What you are worried about more is heat dissipation from internal to mask your ship from IR detection and reflecting as much of the external heat as possible to allow for proper regulation of the internal temperature.


I recently saw a horrible "Western" movie on the Sci-Fi channel. Aliens had invaded a small town where one enterprising scientist had already begun to mine uranium and the aliens wanted it.

I ranted about how inappropriate it was for everyone to be carrying double-action revolvers in the "Old West" (including a couple of Colt .357 Pythons) It was also possible that one of the characters carried an English Webley. It drove me nuts.

My wife asked me "so that makes it unbelievable for you? You can suspend your disbelief for the aliens but not for the wrong handguns?"

My point? By the time "we" are able to build single-seat "fighters" with the range to effect interplanetary travel between solar systems, their cooling capabilities might be more advanced than just relying on the color of the exterior paint. (i.e. the interplanetary travel didn't bother you, just the black paint did?)

In addition, the same things (regarding heat dissipation and IR signatures) have been said about modern air combat fighters, yet we still also use muted gray camouflage tones to minimize vulnerability and optical detection when the fight devolves into a "knife fight in a phone booth" when the primary sensor is the Mark 1 eyeball.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Sun Oct 04, 2009 1:47 pm 
Offline
2000+ Post Club
2000+ Post Club
User avatar

Joined: Thu May 10, 2007 6:08 pm
Posts: 2595
Location: Mississippi
this thread makes my ears bleed.

















:P

_________________
"I knew the jig was up when I saw the P-51D-20-NA Mustang blue-nosed bastards from Bodney, and by the way the blue was more of a royal blue than an indigo and the inner landing gear interiors were NOT green, over Berlin."


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Sun Oct 04, 2009 3:23 pm 
Offline
1000+ Posts!
1000+ Posts!
User avatar

Joined: Sun Jan 28, 2007 4:46 pm
Posts: 1523
Location: Brenham, Texas
Seems like I read in a description somewhere of YB-40's that the radio room turret was a smaller Martin turret like from a Marauder. I've also read that by the time they saw use, no two had identical armaments. Double .50's at the waist, hand held 20mm's and one yahoo even tried a pedestal mounted 37 mm. In front of that rig sounded safer than holding it!
Rutan 17 landing gear? Simple. Nose gear where the bomb bay was and put a bomb or two where the old tail gear was.

_________________
"I love the smell of 100LL in the morning."


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Sun Oct 04, 2009 8:58 pm 
Offline
Long Time Member
Long Time Member
User avatar

Joined: Fri Apr 30, 2004 7:13 pm
Posts: 5672
Location: Minnesota, USA
Canso42 wrote:
Seems like I read in a description somewhere of YB-40's that the radio room turret was a smaller Martin turret like from a Marauder...


Looks like a Martin. Still must've been a tight fit.

Image

_________________
It was a good idea, it just didn't work.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Mon Oct 05, 2009 8:56 am 
Offline

Joined: Sat May 05, 2007 11:26 pm
Posts: 154
C'mon - Rutan would have used pusher props. :wink:


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Mon Oct 05, 2009 9:04 am 
Offline
Account Suspended
User avatar

Joined: Wed Nov 14, 2007 3:06 pm
Posts: 2713
While looking through my Dad's old logbook, i noticed he spent about 40 hours in a YB-40.., as noted in his book. He was training pilots in these clunkers.., luckily this was about the same time they posted a sign-up sheet for B-29 pilots and he made that list.., otherwise I may not be here. The YB-40's were a disaster waiting to happen.., . Battlewagon my A$$!!!

_________________
S.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Mon Oct 05, 2009 8:22 pm 
Offline
1000+ Posts!
1000+ Posts!
User avatar

Joined: Sun Jan 28, 2007 4:46 pm
Posts: 1523
Location: Brenham, Texas
Was the 330th your dad's outfit?

_________________
"I love the smell of 100LL in the morning."


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Mon Oct 05, 2009 8:46 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sun Aug 03, 2008 1:10 pm
Posts: 489
Location: Dallas, TEXAS
Rajay wrote:

He also gave me points for painting it black. Star Trek always got it wrong! In space, why in the heck would you paint a warship WHITE?

Sorry for the detour.... :?

By the time folks worry about what color to paint a spacecraft it won't really matter.

But look at current aircraft, whites and grays really show stains. Finding leaks will probably be pretty important.

CAPFlyer wrote:

Okay, back to the original subject, I've seen a couple of models of this "Rutan B-17" online in the past and they always looked interesting, especially how some solved the landing gear issues. I think someone even attempted to build an RC model of it, but I can't find it anymore. Can't remember if it worked or not either, although with most RC models, success of the RC version has no bearing on if the real thing would work due to the very different lift/drag ratios and thrust/weight ratios.


Well duh, the nose gear comes out like a B-52. You just cannot see the bulges due to camouflage. And its just your imagination that they won't fit.

Also saw a model of a swept wing B-17 somewhere. It was pretty neat. I think it was a B-17, B-47 kitbash.

I always liked the clean look of the turretless fortresses.

Image


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Tue Oct 06, 2009 8:44 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Tue Nov 23, 2004 10:28 pm
Posts: 788
Location: Washington State
Now back to our regular topic.... :)

My father spent time in YB-40s during his training....perhaps as one of the students taught by the330thbg's father.

_________________
Remember the vets, the wonderful planes they flew and their sacrifices for a future many of them did not live to see.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Tue Oct 06, 2009 9:01 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Mar 20, 2008 8:05 am
Posts: 448
Location: Manchester, Michigan
Here is a link to a modeling site that has the plastic scale, "what if," model.

http://www.aircraftresourcecenter.com/

Click "Gallery" on the top then look for "Propeller" then search "B-17" and you will see it.
Sorry it's the only link it would give me :roll:

Regards,
Mark

_________________
Once you have tasted flight you will walk the earth with your eyes turned skywards... for there you have been and there you will long to return. Leonardo daVinci


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Tue Oct 06, 2009 9:31 am 
Offline
Long Time Member
Long Time Member
User avatar

Joined: Tue May 11, 2004 5:42 pm
Posts: 6884
Location: The Goldfields, Victoria, Australia
mtpopejoy wrote:
Here is a link to a modeling site that has the plastic scale, "what if," model.

Good one Mark, and with a frame-bust: http://www.aircraftresourcecenter.com/G ... on/00.shtm

_________________
James K

"Switch on the underwater landing lights"
Emilio Largo, Thunderball.

www.VintageAeroWriter.com


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Wed Oct 07, 2009 4:08 pm 
Offline
Account Suspended
User avatar

Joined: Wed Nov 14, 2007 3:06 pm
Posts: 2713
Canso42 wrote:
Was the 330th your dad's outfit?


Yes it was.

_________________
S.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Wed Oct 07, 2009 4:10 pm 
Offline
Account Suspended
User avatar

Joined: Wed Nov 14, 2007 3:06 pm
Posts: 2713
JBoyle wrote:
Now back to our regular topic.... :)

My father spent time in YB-40s during his training....perhaps as one of the students taught by the330thbg's father.


That would be cool!!!!

_________________
S.


Top
 Profile  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 30 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2

All times are UTC - 5 hours


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Google [Bot], sandiego89, Xray and 47 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group