CAPFlyer wrote:
Quick sidebar -
Rajay wrote:
He also gave me points for painting it black. Star Trek always got it wrong! In space, why in the heck would you paint a warship WHITE?
For the same reason the Space Shuttle and ISS are white - temperature regulation.
In space, paint doesn't matter. Most of where combat would be taking place, actual ability to see would be negligible without serious image enhancement, and then in reality, color wouldn't matter as much. What you are worried about more is heat dissipation from internal to mask your ship from IR detection and reflecting as much of the external heat as possible to allow for proper regulation of the internal temperature.
I recently saw a horrible "Western" movie on the Sci-Fi channel. Aliens had invaded a small town where one enterprising scientist had already begun to mine uranium and the aliens wanted it.
I ranted about how inappropriate it was for everyone to be carrying double-action revolvers in the "Old West" (including a couple of Colt .357 Pythons) It was also possible that one of the characters carried an English Webley. It drove me nuts.
My wife asked me "so that makes it unbelievable for you? You can suspend your disbelief for the aliens but not for the wrong handguns?"
My point? By the time "we" are able to build single-seat "fighters" with the range to effect interplanetary travel between solar systems, their cooling capabilities might be more advanced than just relying on the color of the exterior paint. (i.e. the interplanetary travel didn't bother you, just the black paint did?)
In addition, the same things (regarding heat dissipation and IR signatures) have been said about modern air combat fighters, yet we still also use muted gray camouflage tones to minimize vulnerability and optical detection when the fight devolves into a "knife fight in a phone booth" when the primary sensor is the Mark 1 eyeball.