Warbird Information Exchange

DISCLAIMER: The views expressed on this site are the responsibility of the poster and do not reflect the views of the management.
It is currently Mon Jan 12, 2026 10:00 pm

All times are UTC - 5 hours


Classic Wings Magazine WWII Naval Aviation Research Pacific Luftwaffe Resource Center
When Hollywood Ruled The Skies - Volumes 1 through 4 by Bruce Oriss


Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 24 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2
Author Message
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Wed Jun 10, 2009 3:31 pm 
Offline
Long Time Member
Long Time Member
User avatar

Joined: Fri Apr 30, 2004 7:13 pm
Posts: 5672
Location: Minnesota, USA
retroaviation wrote:
...The only thing that should be added, was that when the airplane was donated, so was the funding to make it airworthy. It was decided to use that money "elsewhere" and just make the airplane into a static display...

Gary


Image

_________________
It was a good idea, it just didn't work.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Wed Jun 10, 2009 4:53 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Apr 17, 2008 4:32 pm
Posts: 791
Location: Wiesbaden, Germany
Well, Ya just got to love it when you get home from work, check the WIX and your innocent question has caused the Merde to hit the Oscillator.
I would be willing to bet that the great folks at the shuttleworth collection or Duxford would have that beast on a fast track to flying condition in no time.
What prompted the interest in the first place was I just read "To war in a stringbag" By Commander Charles Lamb, RN. Highly recommended, a great read.

_________________
All I did was press this red button here...


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Wed Jun 10, 2009 5:04 pm 
Offline
Co-MVP - 2006
User avatar

Joined: Fri Nov 18, 2005 10:39 am
Posts: 4468
Location: Midland, TX Yee-haw.
It's definitely a cool old airplane, and I must say that it is a great addition to the static displays in the CAF main hangar. And as mentioned before.....its B-I-G!!! :shock:

Gary


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Wed Jun 10, 2009 6:04 pm 
Offline
3000+ Post Club
3000+ Post Club
User avatar

Joined: Thu Mar 24, 2005 10:10 pm
Posts: 4173
Location: Pearland, Texas
Hmmmm... Usually a cash donation accepted with specific directions as to application must be followed by the non profit organization. Otherwise, I think it's called diversion of funds or something like that... oh, and I don't think that's legal.

You lawyers can jump in anytime now ! :lol:

_________________
"You cannot invade the mainland United States. There would be a rifle behind each blade of grass..."
Admiral Isoruku Yamamoto


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Wed Jun 10, 2009 6:08 pm 
Offline
3000+ Post Club
3000+ Post Club
User avatar

Joined: Sun Feb 12, 2006 9:58 pm
Posts: 3282
Location: Nelson City, Texas
Oh heck Gary just send the helicopters down here to the secret bunker and I'll take care of em for you. As for doing things as directed by the donor all you have to do is keep it secret, don't tell the membership, just feed em mushrooms and it will be all right. By the way does it have a big honkin decal on it yet?


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Thu Jun 11, 2009 2:34 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sun Sep 28, 2008 9:44 pm
Posts: 379
No tattoo yet? I think they are for flying aircraft??
Dave


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Thu Jun 11, 2009 3:23 pm 
Offline
1000+ Posts!
1000+ Posts!
User avatar

Joined: Sat Jun 03, 2006 10:08 pm
Posts: 1182
Location: Tulsa, OK
RickH-

Our auditors go through our books once a year for a complete audit, and separate funds into "restricted" and "unrestricted." For our purposes, the main difference is that funds raised as part of a capital fund but unused must be used for a future capital project, whether it's a renovation, acquisition or new construction. The original donor can remove the restriction at his/her discretion if they choose. That, however, is the extent of my knowledge on the subject. I think part of it is just good donor relations- when I raise money for a project, they expect that it is spent on that project. And an attentive donor (almost all foundations) will require after-action reports within one year that report not only on how the money was spent, but whether the goals for its expenditure were met.

kevin

_________________
FOUND the elusive DT-built B-24! Woo-hoo!!!


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Thu Jun 11, 2009 3:43 pm 
Offline
2000+ Post Club
2000+ Post Club
User avatar

Joined: Fri Apr 30, 2004 7:34 pm
Posts: 2938
B29B24crewchief wrote:
No tattoo yet? I think they are for flying aircraft??
Dave


I did not realize there was a charge for the tattoos or how spendy they are....
Small $77.50/pair + S&H
Medium $160.88/pair + S&H
Large $192.70/pair + S&H


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Thu Jun 11, 2009 4:01 pm 
Offline
Co-MVP - 2006
User avatar

Joined: Fri Nov 18, 2005 10:39 am
Posts: 4468
Location: Midland, TX Yee-haw.
B29B24crewchief wrote:
No tattoo yet? I think they are for flying aircraft??
Dave


There was one on the Twin Mustang. So there goes that theory. ;-)

My guess is that there may be some resistance from the museum staff not wanting to put a tramp stamp on "their" airplanes. Notice the I-16 doesn't have one either.

Gary


Top
 Profile  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 24 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2

All times are UTC - 5 hours


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 74 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group