Warbird Information Exchange

DISCLAIMER: The views expressed on this site are the responsibility of the poster and do not reflect the views of the management.
It is currently Tue Jul 01, 2025 2:42 pm

All times are UTC - 5 hours


Classic Wings Magazine WWII Naval Aviation Research Pacific Luftwaffe Resource Center
When Hollywood Ruled The Skies - Volumes 1 through 4 by Bruce Oriss


Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 19 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2
Author Message
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Tue Jan 13, 2009 9:51 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sat Dec 08, 2007 11:05 pm
Posts: 656
All I can find...
http://www.bismarck-class.dk/tirpitz/hi ... gsten.html


http://www.bismarck-class.dk/tirpitz/mi ... d_now.html


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Tue Jan 13, 2009 10:07 pm 
Offline

Joined: Fri Nov 25, 2005 1:16 am
Posts: 26
Here is a BuAer report that details a performance test between the corsair, hellcat with a FW-190A5-U5. While the 190 has certain strengths, all the evaluating pilots favored the navy planes.

http://home.comcast.net/~markw4/index1.html


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Tue Jan 13, 2009 10:08 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sun Aug 31, 2008 4:02 pm
Posts: 130
Location: Savannah GA
I think the Corsair and the Hellcat would have needed turbo superchargers to deal with the regular demands of escort altitude if you are talking missions with the 8th AF. Of course that would not have been as big a deal in 9thAF fighter bomber type missions.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Tue Jan 13, 2009 11:14 pm 
Offline
3000+ Post Club
3000+ Post Club
User avatar

Joined: Fri Mar 02, 2007 6:52 pm
Posts: 3413
Location: Wichita Falls, Texas, USA
bobbrunn wrote:
I think the Corsair and the Hellcat would have needed turbo superchargers to deal with the regular demands of escort altitude if you are talking missions with the 8th AF. Of course that would not have been as big a deal in 9thAF fighter bomber type missions.


Why do you think that? The F6F and F4U had two-stage superchargers that gave both aircraft a service ceiling of around 37,000 feet in the F4U-1 and the F6F-5, and over 41,000 feet in the F4U-4 and F4U-5. The R2800 was more than capable of extended high altitude flight as was demonstrated by the WWII C-46 and the post war T-29/C-131 and C-118, all of which used the R2800 and regularly flew at altitudes similar to the B-17s and B-24s.

Both aircraft escorted B-17s and B-24s in the Pacific, so why would it be a stretch to believe they couldn't do the same in Europe? The only real drawback the aircraft had over the AAF fighters was range. The Corsair only had a range of around 1100 miles even with a centerline tank, while the P-51D could make well over 1600 miles. Even the later F4U-4 couldn't get more range even with it's twin drop tank capability because they removed the wing tanks.


Top
 Profile  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 19 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2

All times are UTC - 5 hours


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Google [Bot] and 45 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group