Warbird Information Exchange

DISCLAIMER: The views expressed on this site are the responsibility of the poster and do not reflect the views of the management.
It is currently Fri Jul 04, 2025 12:52 pm

All times are UTC - 5 hours


Classic Wings Magazine WWII Naval Aviation Research Pacific Luftwaffe Resource Center
When Hollywood Ruled The Skies - Volumes 1 through 4 by Bruce Oriss


Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 19 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2
Author Message
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Sun Jan 11, 2009 10:42 pm 
Offline
3000+ Post Club
3000+ Post Club
User avatar

Joined: Tue Jul 17, 2007 9:11 pm
Posts: 3160
Location: MQS- Coatesville, PA
Second Air Force wrote:
I wondered about that too--could the brakes be A-26 units? Pyote reactivated a large number and parted out a good many A-26s to support the Korean conflict.

Scott

The cowling and Engine mount laying on the ground behind the guy washing the brakes look like A-26 as well.
Can't imagine washing the brakes with water under pressure like that. The housing and some moving parts are magnesium that corrode and create leaks and oozing of hyd fluid. Also the stators and rotors of the stack of discs are steel.
Interesting.
Rich

_________________
Rich Palmer

Remember an Injured Youth
benstear.org
#64- Stay Strong and Keep the Faith

BOOM BOOM, ROUND ROUND, PROPELLER GO

Don't Be A Dilbert!


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Sun Jan 11, 2009 10:48 pm 
Offline
3000+ Post Club
3000+ Post Club
User avatar

Joined: Thu Sep 28, 2006 12:56 pm
Posts: 3442
Location: North of Texas, South of Kansas
I imagine that the brakes were cleaned, dried, and immediately shipped off to be refurbished, maybe at the Tinker or San Antonio depots? Hard to say, and I doubt there is a lot of good documentation since the reactivation for Korea was done with great haste. I will try to remember to research the Pyote story the next time I get to AFHRA.

I do know that a LOT of 3350s were removed from the "parts" B-29s and shipped to OCAMA at Tinker for overhaul or a flyover inspection before being shipped to the combat zone.

Scott


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Mon Jan 12, 2009 7:19 am 
Offline
3000+ Post Club
3000+ Post Club
User avatar

Joined: Thu Mar 24, 2005 10:10 pm
Posts: 4173
Location: Pearland, Texas
Scott, when we resurrected the F4 and later TA I spent a lot of time out there at AMARC.

The Navy decided to bag F18s because of what the AF charges to fully preserve an aircraft. I also saw a few F4s that were bagged.

I've only seen the spraylat process applied to stored airframes. No modern "shrinkwrapping" unless the aircraft is dismatled and being readied for shipping.

The last time I spent any time in the facility was January, 2004 so it's possible newer techniques are being used.

_________________
"You cannot invade the mainland United States. There would be a rifle behind each blade of grass..."
Admiral Isoruku Yamamoto


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Tue Jan 13, 2009 1:28 am 
Offline
3000+ Post Club
3000+ Post Club
User avatar

Joined: Thu Sep 28, 2006 12:56 pm
Posts: 3442
Location: North of Texas, South of Kansas
Rick,

I'd bet that the bagged F-4 and F-8 that we saw in '89 were the proof articles of the bags you saw on the F-18s when you were visiting AMARC. The sergeant leading our tour only knew for sure that they were the first two airframes stored in that fashion and that it was a new deal.

Scott


Top
 Profile  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 19 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2

All times are UTC - 5 hours


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Chris Brame, Google [Bot] and 66 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group