Wed Jan 07, 2009 8:49 pm
Wed Jan 07, 2009 8:57 pm
Pooner wrote:This just in, folks..
Rumour has it that the USN is currently considering a proposal to allow Yanks to have access to some hardware that includes a N3N-3 trainer (converted to sprayer confirguation in the 1960s), a Douglas R5D transport (sitting derelict without engines, tail section and port wing at Memorial airfield, Chandler, AZ), and a P2V Neptune cockpit section saved from scrapping by a former aerial applicator somewhere in Wyoming.
Navy officials say these items may be suitable for private museum display, after review of their terms and conditions, but only after these former "war machines" have gone through a rigorous "demilitarization process" to strip them of all potentially classified hardware and anything that could cause harm to the general populace.
This, of course, is pending decision from the Navy's legal department to determine true declassification status of these warbirds and with assistance from a Congressional oversight committee specifically appointed to watchdog over this "proposed" exchange. Deliberation is expected to last 24-48 months.![]()
Geez. What an insult. USN ought to be darn ashamed of their actions on this one in dealing with a museum of this calibre. While trying to portrey to the public they are protecting "national interests," USN instead blunders - again - with yet another retarded maneuver.
Mr. Nichols, sure hope you get the opportunity to stick it to Uncle Sugar and deep into the fleshy hind quarters of USN sometime in the future, as from what I see they sure did it to you folks. I, too, can read through a press release and smell "buffalo bagels" prepared by a lawyer to indicate everyone is happy-happy with the outcome. What a load...
Good luck to you, sir. Sorry it worked out that way.
Wed Jan 07, 2009 8:58 pm
Wed Jan 07, 2009 9:22 pm
Wed Jan 07, 2009 10:07 pm
Forgotten Field wrote:Sorry, but this came to mind when I read this:The right of the people to be secure in their persons, houses, papers, and effects, against unreasonable searches and seizures, shall not be violated, and no Warrants shall issue, but upon probable cause, supported by Oath or affirmation, and particularly describing the place to be searched, and the persons or things to be seized.
What probable cause did the G have for thinking that the aircraft would be used for terrorist acts? Last time I checked, the museum wasn't on the terrorist watch list....
Wed Jan 07, 2009 10:09 pm
Wed Jan 07, 2009 11:00 pm
P51Mstg wrote:IRAN is supposed to have 14-16 flyable F-14s and possibly a total of 44 that COULD be made flyable..... (saw that somewhere the other day)
Mark H
Wed Jan 07, 2009 11:38 pm
If POF felt there was value in publicising the details I'm sure they already would have.warbird1 wrote:Why, are the details secret, or you just don't know?
Thu Jan 08, 2009 12:50 am
Thu Jan 08, 2009 7:59 am
Thu Jan 08, 2009 8:23 pm
P51Mstg wrote:Lawyers from Jones Day....... All Day and all night...... had a friend that worked there.... Expensive lawyers to rent.......
IRAN is supposed to have 14-16 flyable F-14s and possibly a total of 44 that COULD be made flyable..... (saw that somewhere the other day)
Mark H
Thu Jan 08, 2009 8:46 pm
Thu Jan 08, 2009 8:46 pm
Fri Jan 09, 2009 4:37 am
Fri Jan 09, 2009 10:05 am