Fri Jun 27, 2008 7:19 pm
retroaviation wrote:here's an artists conception of how a Mustang would look with a "real" engine in it. I gotta say....I kinda like it!![]()
![]()
Gary
Fri Jun 27, 2008 7:52 pm
Mon Jun 30, 2008 12:10 am
Bill Greenwood wrote:Warbird 1, you suggested I donate my Spitfire to a flying museum..........
So your suggestion is one I have considered, but it has never led anywhere.
Mon Jun 30, 2008 1:30 am
warbird1 wrote:Bill Greenwood wrote:Warbird 1, you suggested I donate my Spitfire to a flying museum..........
So your suggestion is one I have considered, but it has never led anywhere.
Sorry to hear about all of your bad luck, Bill. It sounds like you are in the exact same situation that Lefty was in after his son had the unfortunate P-38 incident.
I don't know how much your Spit is worth now in light of the damage it has sustained, or how much repairs would cost to get it flying again, but would you consider selling it to another individual or organization? I don't have anybody in mind, just a rhetorical question?
Would you consider downgrading to another "more affordable" warbird? With the money from the sale of the Spit you can look at other warbirds more in line with your budget.
There are two warbirds out there that would have nearly the same performance, and probably be a lot cheaper to operate. The new build Yak-3/-7/-9 series and the Sea Fury, in my mind, are the two best values in warbirds right now, as far as bang for the buck. All of these come in two seat models, so you could still take up passengers for rides. Since they all run either Allisons, 3350's or 4360's, I would think they would be much more friendly on the pocketbook than the specialized Spitfire parts.
The Yaks and Sea Fury's can be obtained now for well under $ 750K to $ 800K for current flying examples. They certainly would have the performance that is very close to the Spit.
Just something to think about.
Mon Jun 30, 2008 2:32 pm
Mon Jun 30, 2008 3:06 pm
Mon Jun 30, 2008 6:59 pm