This is the place where the majority of the warbird (aircraft that have survived military service) discussions will take place. Specialized forums may be added in the new future
Post a reply

Thu May 15, 2008 11:00 am

I'm sorry I opened that can of worms in someone else's "good" thread. If we need to have another Movie Belle thread locked lets start a new thread and leave this "projects" thread along so we might learn something new and cool.

Tim

Thu May 15, 2008 3:02 pm

That B-17C project, was it going to be a full replica? Or is there a parts source.

C model

Thu May 15, 2008 4:39 pm

The bird will have alot of original parts.There are parts being made now that will really help the plane along as well as other B-17s.

B-17C

Thu May 15, 2008 4:40 pm

I posted a picture of BLK #3 Upper a few days ago.

It will have many original *B-17* parts, and it is not
intended to be a replica. Still, the scarceness of B-17C
parts will mean many of those will be re-manufactured.
Still, I don't think that will detract from the sight of a
shark-tail winging it's way around the sky.

Re: B-17C

Thu May 15, 2008 4:54 pm

DryMartini wrote:I posted a picture of BLK #3 Upper a few days ago.

It will have many original *B-17* parts, and it is not
intended to be a replica. Still, the scarceness of B-17C
parts will mean many of those will be re-manufactured.
Still, I don't think that will detract from the sight of a
shark-tail winging it's way around the sky.


Wow, best of luck, Dry Martini! What an ambitious project. Have you guys thought about scouring the countryside for shark-fin wrecks in the States? I don't remember where I saw it, but there is a link somewhere on the internet, which shows pictures of very substantial remains of an early shark-fin somewhere high up in the mountains of the Pacific Northwest. I think Col. Rohr has that info, if I'm not mistaken. It's not even in water, so the Navy couldn't dispute that. I guess the only thing besides money to recover it, is that it probably would be on some kind of federal land, park, or preserve. I would think that would be a lot easier to deal with than the Navy, however. :D

Thu May 15, 2008 5:54 pm

I think that would be great. Everyone wins. We have done it in the past. THe NMUSAF helped Air Heritage get "909" back in the air after the crash at BVI back in the late 1980's. They sent us patterns, drawings, and material to help get the plane airborne again. They also did the same for the top turret of the P-61 in Reading. MAAM lent us a turret, and we made a copy of it for the P-61 at the NMUSAF, and made a second for MAAM, and I think Kermit Weeks.

Thu May 15, 2008 6:01 pm

Aren't there also some RAF B-17C remains at a crash site in Norway?

Re: B-17C

Thu May 15, 2008 6:06 pm

warbird1 wrote:
DryMartini wrote:I posted a picture of BLK #3 Upper a few days ago.

It will have many original *B-17* parts, and it is not
intended to be a replica. Still, the scarceness of B-17C
parts will mean many of those will be re-manufactured.
Still, I don't think that will detract from the sight of a
shark-tail winging it's way around the sky.


I think Col. Rohr has that info, if I'm not mistaken.


He is laughing his a$s off on my speaker phone right now!

Re: B-17C

Thu May 15, 2008 6:08 pm

DryMartini wrote:I posted a picture of BLK #3 Upper a few days ago.

It will have many original *B-17* parts, and it is not
intended to be a replica. Still, the scarceness of B-17C
parts will mean many of those will be re-manufactured.
Still, I don't think that will detract from the sight of a
shark-tail winging it's way around the sky.


I meant no disrespect by using the replica term. I just wasn't aware of the project. That is going to be coo! 8)

Thu May 15, 2008 6:13 pm

Maybe there could be a compromise on the Tell's Peak C model - might a dedicated restorer be approved to remove the tail section for use in the recreation and leave the wings on the mountain?

(Is the Col. laughing at me now?)

Thu May 15, 2008 6:16 pm

Chris Brame wrote:Maybe there could be a compromise on the Tell's Peak C model - might a dedicated restorer be approved to remove the tail section for use in the recreation and leave the wings on the mountain?

(Is the Col. laughing at me now?)


He is Cackling like a Moxie Drunk Mainer.

Oh, and while giggling he said he knows the locations of 6 C Models.
And has seen three of them.

(Dont we all miss him on here?)

Thu May 15, 2008 6:32 pm

He is Cackling like a Moxie Drunk Mainer.


I got some of that stuff from a little store near Desert Hot Springs - "drunk" wasn't quite the sensation I got from it.

He said he knows the locations of 6 C Models.
And has seen three of them.


He must be a good swimmer!

(Don't we all miss him on here?)


Tell him the proofreader says hello!

Fri May 16, 2008 12:58 am

Thanks TriangleP, I knew I'd read that info somewhere, just didn't remember where. The whole idea of an early Fort in the air is a wonderful thing.

Scott

Fri May 16, 2008 4:08 am

If anybody wants a decent B17C I'd have said the RAF's AN529 in Libya was a good bet.

Unless its been cut up or trashed like that Handley Page Hermes. And the Lady Be Good. And the intact, sat on its gear Bristol Blenheim.

Bucket and sand shovels at the ready....



Ric
Post a reply