Tue Aug 28, 2007 7:13 pm
John Beyl wrote:Bill Greenwood wrote:I was also under the impression at first that the D had a thicker more rounded wing. I think i may have gotten this from Jeff Ethel's video on flying the B model, that the B had a sharper stall. However, I was at Fantasy of Flight looking at Kermit's plane and he specifically said the airfoil was the same for B/C as the D.
Bill,
As far as I know it is the same airfoil. Since none of the outer dimensions of the wing changed, it would be impossible to change it's thickness and not change the airfoil. I'm also pretty sure it uses the same spar's as the D model (with only minor changes) so that pretty well tells the story. If I'm wrong I'll buy you a beer BDK!
John
Tue Aug 28, 2007 7:30 pm
What is an airfoil? The B/C & D all used the same airfoil SECTION (same basic NACA number), but I suspect they were of different thicknesses as measured in percent of chord.
Looking for data!
Tue Aug 28, 2007 11:20 pm
Wed Aug 29, 2007 5:56 am
Wed Aug 29, 2007 6:14 am
bdk wrote:John Beyl wrote:Bill Greenwood wrote:I was also under the impression at first that the D had a thicker more rounded wing. I think i may have gotten this from Jeff Ethel's video on flying the B model, that the B had a sharper stall. However, I was at Fantasy of Flight looking at Kermit's plane and he specifically said the airfoil was the same for B/C as the D.
Bill,
As far as I know it is the same airfoil. Since none of the outer dimensions of the wing changed, it would be impossible to change it's thickness and not change the airfoil. I'm also pretty sure it uses the same spar's as the D model (with only minor changes) so that pretty well tells the story. If I'm wrong I'll buy you a beer BDK!
John
What is an airfoil? The B/C & D all used the same airfoil SECTION (same basic NACA number), but I suspect they were of different thicknesses as measured in percent of chord.
Looking for data!
Wed Aug 29, 2007 6:33 pm
Wed Aug 29, 2007 6:48 pm
Wed Aug 29, 2007 9:32 pm
visaliaaviation wrote:Paul,
On another note: I had no intention of startng a flame war regarding "African -American's" in US squadron service. I can understand the ABSALUTE need to discuss the concepts of racial injustice and issues in a historical context. My comment was made under the impression that no obvious context was being given for the photos and hence my suggestion. I see now that both you and I were a bit wrong, for I gave no thought to the time of when "African-american" came into being (post post WWII) and it seemed passe' for today. I was of the opinion that they just needed to be recognized as American fighter pilots. Of course, there should also always be some mention of who they were and what they were doing at the time, in every historical discussion.