Warbird Information Exchange

DISCLAIMER: The views expressed on this site are the responsibility of the poster and do not reflect the views of the management.
It is currently Sat Aug 30, 2025 2:51 pm

All times are UTC - 5 hours


Classic Wings Magazine WWII Naval Aviation Research Pacific Luftwaffe Resource Center
When Hollywood Ruled The Skies - Volumes 1 through 4 by Bruce Oriss


Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 31 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2, 3  Next
Author Message
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Tue Aug 07, 2007 10:56 am 
Offline

Joined: Wed Sep 01, 2004 11:12 am
Posts: 871
Where is the lake where the Mars photographed at?


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Tue Aug 07, 2007 11:03 am 
Offline
3000+ Post Club
3000+ Post Club
User avatar

Joined: Fri Mar 02, 2007 6:52 pm
Posts: 3414
Location: Wichita Falls, Texas, USA
The pictures were taken at Sproat Lake, Vancouver Island, British Columbia


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Tue Aug 07, 2007 11:31 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Nov 29, 2006 12:44 am
Posts: 396
Location: Vancouver, Canada
Quote:


Anyone know anything about the Albatross that is in the pictures? I have never seen that one before.

_________________
real airplanes have round engines


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: fire bombers
PostPosted: Tue Aug 07, 2007 12:55 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Mon Jul 17, 2006 6:59 pm
Posts: 844
Location: Redmond,Oregon
Nathan,the short answer on using the PB4Y's would be no.After the H&P auction,the rumor is that a number of serious cracks have been found in the wing spars.Maybe Matt or one of the other guys that are more familiar with these airplanes can add detail.At any rate,the Feds aren't contracting any large tankers other than Aero Union's P-3's and Neptune's P-2's.These operators came up with somewhat tenuous paperwork from Lockheed concerning airframe life that more or less satsfied the contracting officer.

I understand that the Fed contracts will be rebid for next year and the rumor is that the Airframe Life Limit that was demaded by the Feds in order to eliminate all tankers except for P-2's and P-3's will be dropped.This is a little late,as all of the operators that had competing airframes such as DC-4's have been driven out of business.The civilian C-130A's won't be considered because of the bad P.R. following the endless replays of the Tanker 130 accident on national television.The latest rumor concerning the MAFFS program is that the Guard C-130's won't be activated this year mainly because somebody in fire management finally figured out the actual cost of those aircraft.However,MAFFS might still show up before the year is over as the program still has support in Washington,D.C.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Tue Aug 07, 2007 9:27 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Tue Jan 17, 2006 11:57 pm
Posts: 70
Location: Boise, ID
Both P-2 and P-3 have been flying here in Boise (even some SEATs). I sure miss the days when the tanker base had 3-4, and on busy years, upwards of 8 large tankers on the ramp. Used to just grab a sack lunch and go watch the operations for hours. Sadly the guys next door to the base (NIFC) have largely eliminated that summer time tradition. Once I was even able to see the KC-97 briefly operate from BOI. As to date, aprox. 1,000,000 acres have burned in Idaho alone this year. Wouldn't it be nice if there were more help from the air...

On another note the Idaho ANG operates C-130. They are directly across the airport from NIFC. Yet (and I could be wrong here) a C-130 unit out of N. Carolina would come in to operate MAFFS. When the IDANG requested that mission (because of proximity) they were denied. Makes sense?


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Tue Aug 07, 2007 9:36 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sun Mar 25, 2007 1:17 pm
Posts: 97
Location: Idaho
flyboyid wrote:
Both P-2 and P-3 have been flying here in Boise (even some SEATs). I sure miss the days when the tanker base had 3-4, and on busy years, upwards of 8 large tankers on the ramp. Used to just grab a sack lunch and go watch the operations for hours. Sadly the guys next door to the base (NIFC) have largely eliminated that summer time tradition. Once I was even able to see the KC-97 briefly operate from BOI. As to date, aprox. 1,000,000 acres have burned in Idaho alone this year. Wouldn't it be nice if there were more help from the air...


It's a similar sad story up here in the north end. When there were regularly DC-4s, 6's, 7's, P2Vs and PB4Y's, now I'm lucky if I see a Neptune. Most of the time the ramp is occupied by that little ugly Air Tractor that can maybe haul half of what the others could.

_________________
http://www.disrudstudios.com


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Fri Aug 10, 2007 11:58 am 
Offline

Joined: Fri Jun 30, 2006 5:20 am
Posts: 20
Location: Le Mans, France
Hello

Buffalo Airways in Canada has bought tanker 14 & 15 of Aero Union a couple of years ago; they are DC4 equiped with state of the art RADS dropping systems.They are probably from 1944-45 and we probably stay active for a long time!!!

Image
(sorry, my picture,taken in 2004 didn't had the same state of the art treatment )

They seem to have 4 canso still active
http://www.buffaloairways.com/cansos.htm


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Fri Aug 10, 2007 12:17 pm 
Offline
3000+ Post Club
3000+ Post Club

Joined: Fri Jun 24, 2005 7:26 pm
Posts: 4974
Location: PA
Nice! :D

_________________
Shop the Airplane Bunker At
www.warbirdbunker.com


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Fri Aug 10, 2007 2:20 pm 
CAPFlyer wrote:
According to the Mars book I have, they use R3350-24WAs which are rated at 2500HP.


You may be right, I can't say for sure exactly what the current engines are on the 2 existing Mars aircraft, but below is something I posted back in an earlier thread in March. I think my information was either a book reference or an internet reference - I can't remember. It's conceivable that engines could have been changed or downgraded at some point, but I believe there were several of the last Mars aircraft flown by the Navy in the mid 50s that had the upgraded 3,000 HP R-3350's.

As I understand it, only one Mars, the original JRM-2 was built with P&W R-4360s - all of the other Mars aircraft always had only R-3350s. All of the 4 surviving JRM Mars aircraft operated by the Navy from 1950-56 were equipped with upgraded 3,000 HP R-3350s and these were the same engines used on all of the firebomber airplanes including the existing two surviving aircraft.

:wink:


Top
  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Fri Aug 10, 2007 2:53 pm 
Offline

Joined: Wed Apr 25, 2007 8:08 am
Posts: 563
Location: Copperas Cove Texas
So.......................... what is the wet finger in the air thoughts on this Will a Mars ever be released to a Musem or restored back to WW2 colors and configurations ?

_________________
Always Keep Em Flying !

Glen

Lookie Capt Jim! Wham! Wham! ...............................Termights


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Fri Aug 10, 2007 5:27 pm 
Offline
3000+ Post Club
3000+ Post Club
User avatar

Joined: Fri Mar 02, 2007 6:52 pm
Posts: 3414
Location: Wichita Falls, Texas, USA
The conversion to R3350's was done as part of the tanker conversion. The R3350 is normally rated at 2500HP. Only the Turbocompound variants are rated at 3000HP.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Fri Aug 10, 2007 10:10 pm 
Offline
3000+ Post Club
3000+ Post Club

Joined: Thu Dec 21, 2006 8:32 am
Posts: 4337
Location: Battle Creek, MI
Thanks for the info, guys!

SN


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Tue Aug 14, 2007 2:30 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sun Aug 05, 2007 10:36 pm
Posts: 702
Location: Wherever I happen to be.
What is the breakdown of who got the PB4Ys after H&P closed down and what is their status / pans for the future?
Curtis Block


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Tue Aug 14, 2007 5:01 pm 
Offline

Joined: Thu Jan 12, 2006 1:42 pm
Posts: 460
Location: Nevada
O.K. guys this is what I know of the ex-Aero Union DC-4's that Bufflo got, Both were bought for freighter use and not fire fighting. They were sold without the tanks installed. On the H&P PB4Y2's Gene Powers still has one of them rumored to be tanker #121, one of the Hawkins boys has tanker #126 "I think" the other two were sold at auction, one going to Chino for a restoration the other going to someone down in Arizona for restoration. These were the latest rumors I had heard anyway.
Scott.....


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Tue Aug 14, 2007 9:41 pm 
CAPFlyer wrote:
The conversion to R3350's was done as part of the tanker conversion. The R3350 is normally rated at 2500HP. Only the Turbocompound variants are rated at 3000HP.


There seems to be confusion out there in book and internet sources regarding the engines that powered the various Mars aircraft. Some sources suggest that there was only ONE Mars ever built and/or equipped with R-4360 engines: the JRM-2 "Caroline Mars," and that the Navy converted this and the earlier JRM-1s to a "JRM-3" standard with R-3350s upgraded to a maximum of 3,000 HP and with reversible props on the inboard engines. Other sources suggest that the Navy converted all of their remaining Mars aircraft to the "JRM-3" standard with the R-4360 Wasp Majors.

Hopefully the mystery will be clarified at some point. Basically, was there actually just ONE Mars aircraft ever equipped with R-4360s, or were there up to FIVE Mars aircraft eqquipped with R-4360s at one time??

:roll:


Top
  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 31 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2, 3  Next

All times are UTC - 5 hours


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Google [Bot] and 138 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group