Thanks, Randy, for a note of sanity.
Wonder why the training for becoming a judge takes so long; there clearly a number of guys who know the job here - pity lynch mobs fell out of fashion.
I note how many people are keen to over-punish the miscreant. Having been in similar situations myself, my
first thought and concern is for the museum staff-members and their family; that's hardly an episode for a normal day. A bit of support
there wouldn't go amiss. They deserve and (even if they don't say so) need it. I hope they get it. Nothing worse than a siuation like that in your 'normal' day job.
The damage could've been a lot worse. At least one museum had an mentally unstable person break in and set fire to an aircraft - totally destroying it. Luckily there, the rest of the collection was unaffected. That person was ill; not evil, or on drugs and it was thus an unfortunate problem. However Hitler 'knew' what to do with anyone mentally ill.
It's probably a drug related criminal problem - but we don't
know. There's a lot of people out there who have serious mental problems without drugs and the system's failed them as well. Shooting them would end the problem neatly, but pop some posters here in the same box as Hitler. Doesn't get my vote. Evaluation, trial and an
appropriate sentence. It's not hard.
Whatever happens to
that individual is probably irrelevant. We know chopping hands off or shipping people around the world doesn't stop the next guy. It's a real world heads-up to all museums, that's a risk we face. How good's your museum's security and defence plan?