Warbird Information Exchange

... "hideous contraptions that had promise, but were just too d*mned ugly" ...

For my first exhibit, I present to you for your viewing dis-pleasure, The Short S.B.3

"The Short company found themselves with a promising airframe in search of a role to fulfill. This hideous contraption was conceived for the M.6/49 light anti-submarine aircraft requirement -it was in fact the only contender. Short re-engined their Sturgeon with two 1,147 hp AS Mamba turboprops and, horror of horrors, a monstrous nose affair with the radar in its “chin” and a pair of radar operators above. The first of the two prototypes took flight in Dec. 1950 and proved that it wasn’t only ugly in appearance: it's Mamba engined jet exhaust made the S.B.3 highly unstable. The project was soon cancelled."



















[img]http://warbirdsresourcegroup.org/pix_for_wix/Mark%20Allen%20Colledtion/its_time_again_for/its_time_again_for_WRG-00071445.jpg[/im54

_________________
“Knowing what’s right, doesn’t mean much unless you do what’s right.”

Well that is certainly a WTF ugly airplane......but Short has a long history of WTF ugly airplane designs.

_________________
remember the Oogahonk!
old school enthusiast of Civiltary Warbirds and Air Racers

in the next to last pix, what are those two in the background?

_________________
GOOD MORNING, WELCOME TO THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Press "1" for English.
Press "2" to disconnect until you have learned to speak English.

i guess those are little vents of some sort, as they appear in another photo, but it kind of looks like someone took an axe to it, and removed some camo, in one of the flying shots. seemingly random and haphazard vents, not at all gracefully placed. hand holds?

I believe the jet is a Hawker Sea Hawk and the prop is a Boulton Paul Balliol.

https://www.ebay.com/itm/1944-USAAF-ATC ... %7Ciid%3A1

here is another one....

Might as well post the photos now, they'll be sold in less than an hour:



Haven't heard of a C-76 modded as a "hospital ship" before.

_________________

All right, Mister Dorfmann, start pullin'!
Pilot: "Flap switch works hard in down position."
Mechanic: "Flap switch checked OK. Pilot needs more P.T." - Flight report, TB-17G 42-102875 (Hobbs AAF)

Yes I think you are right DB2. Re the Shorts aircraft I think it is only the droopy chin that makes it look ugly, otherwise if it didn’t have that it would be pretty good.

Chris,

thank you for posting that photo. It wasn't pretty at all. It also was deadly, perhaps the truest visage of an ugly aircraft.

From Wiki....

"The first flight of the YC-76 prototype took place on 3 May 1943.[2] The C-76 proved severely underpowered from the start, with a cruising speed of 160 mph (260 km/h), a service ceiling of 22,600 feet (6,900 m), a range of only 750 mi (1,210 km), and a cargo capacity of under 8,000 lb (3,600 kg). Colonel J.W. Sessums, a USAAF officer at the Air Materiel Command at Wright Field, later related:
'The first flight [of the C-76] was made and the airplane was very heavy. It developed some serious vibrations. In fact, the pilot was awful glad to make a quick circuit to get back on the ground. Two of the Curtiss test pilots took it out on a flight and the Army requested that our project officer on the airplane be allowed to fly along on this trip. The Curtiss Company refused. We were very glad that they refused because on this second flight, it [the C-76] flew apart and the pilots were lost and so was the plane."

The Short is an airplane that makes the Fairey Gannett look like an F-104!

Plus it has a Mamba engine.
When two were placed in the Gannett, it was termed the "Double Mamba"...my all time favorite engine name (Which also sounds like a Latin dance or a euphemism for an act which is unmentionable on a family website such as this.)

_________________
Remember the vets, the wonderful planes they flew and their sacrifices for a future many of them did not live to see.
Note political free signature.
I figure if you wanted my opinion on items unrelated to this forum, you'd ask for it.

And the C-76 was mostly composed of mahogany, so it was built like a grand piano and flew like one. Curtiss cranked out 25 of them and they mostly ended up as ground trainers; eight of the survivors went to the RFC for surplus sale. Guess they might have made good sheds?
ETA: Per William Larkins' book Surplus WWII Aircraft, one C-76 was listed for sale at the WAA facility in Americus, GA with a price tag of $16,000.

Now, what was the final fate of that Short critter?

_________________

All right, Mister Dorfmann, start pullin'!
Pilot: "Flap switch works hard in down position."
Mechanic: "Flap switch checked OK. Pilot needs more P.T." - Flight report, TB-17G 42-102875 (Hobbs AAF)

There is a good history of the C-76 in American Aircraft Development of WWII, Special Types 1939-1945 by Bill Norton.

His series of books on Fights, Bombers, Special Types (cargo, helicopters, seaplanes) are my favorite new book series. He has one being released soon on experimental & researcher types.

_________________
Remember the vets, the wonderful planes they flew and their sacrifices for a future many of them did not live to see.
Note political free signature.
I figure if you wanted my opinion on items unrelated to this forum, you'd ask for it.

Talk about having nasal problems!

_________________
Ain't no sunshine when she's gone!

In later times it might been named the Shorts Leno.

_________________
He bowls overhand...He is the most interesting man in the world.
"In Peace Japan Breeds War", Eckstein, Harper and Bros., 3rd ed. 1943(1927, 1928,1942)
"Leave it to ol' Slim. I got ideas...and they're all vile, baby." South Dakota Slim
"Ahh..."The Deuce", 28,000 pounds of motherly love." quote from some Mojave Grunt
DBF

_________________
Scott Rose
Editor-In-Chief/Webmaster
Warbirds Resource Group - Warbird Information Exchange - Warbird Registry

Be civil, be polite, be nice.... or be elsewhere.
-------------------------------------------------------
This site is brought to you with the support of members like you. If you find this site to be of value to you,
consider supporting this forum and the Warbirds Resource Group with a VOLUNTARY subscription
For as little as $2/month you can help ($2 x 12 = $24/year, less than most magazine subscriptions)
So If you like it here, and want to see it grow, consider helping out.



Thanks to everyone who has so generously supported the site. We really do appreciate it.

Follow us on Twitter! @WIXHQ