Warbird Information Exchange

DISCLAIMER: The views expressed on this site are the responsibility of the poster and do not reflect the views of the management.
It is currently Tue Jun 24, 2025 4:35 am

All times are UTC - 5 hours


Classic Wings Magazine WWII Naval Aviation Research Pacific Luftwaffe Resource Center
When Hollywood Ruled The Skies - Volumes 1 through 4 by Bruce Oriss


Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 21 posts ]  Go to page 1, 2  Next
Author Message
PostPosted: Tue Jul 19, 2011 4:13 pm 
Offline

Joined: Mon Feb 28, 2011 3:11 am
Posts: 837
Here are some post crash close up photos of the ex RAAF / Aussie Mustang that crashed at Duxford otherwise known as Big Beauitful Doll.

http://www.flickr.com/photos/37660802@N ... 4496346485

4 photos in the set keep clicking next to see all. Sadly not much left by the looks of it. High impact collison.

Phil


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Jul 19, 2011 5:08 pm 
Offline

Joined: Fri Aug 12, 2005 3:37 pm
Posts: 672
Somewhere I read an analysis of a fighter crash, and it mentions how the rotating engine crankshaft and pistons will come to pieces in the milliseconds after impact and blow the crankcase open. The photos illustrate the physics of that very well.

_________________
"They done it, they done it, damned if they ain't flew." December 17, 1903


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Jul 19, 2011 5:47 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Mon Jul 05, 2010 1:28 am
Posts: 439
Location: Galena Park Texas
What a loss.

_________________
The nose art/aviation artist and general lunatic from Houston, Texas http://www.jasonbarnettartist.com


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Jul 19, 2011 6:46 pm 
Offline
1000+ Posts!
1000+ Posts!
User avatar

Joined: Fri Nov 12, 2004 8:51 pm
Posts: 1068
Location: Illinois, USA
I am a bit more optimistic. There are a lot of useable pieces in there. I hope it is not all scrapped...truly.
VL


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Jul 19, 2011 9:53 pm 
Offline
3000+ Post Club
3000+ Post Club
User avatar

Joined: Fri May 07, 2004 10:10 pm
Posts: 4405
Location: Maypearl, Texas
vlado wrote:
I am a bit more optimistic. There are a lot of useable pieces in there. I hope it is not all scrapped...truly.
VL


They had rebuilt a lot worse...


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed Jul 20, 2011 12:21 am 
Offline

Joined: Mon Aug 30, 2010 10:22 am
Posts: 49
vlado wrote:
I am a bit more optimistic. There are a lot of useable pieces in there. I hope it is not all scrapped...truly.
VL



We are trying to buy it right now and bring it back to the states to rebuild it


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed Jul 20, 2011 12:38 am 
Offline
3000+ Post Club
3000+ Post Club
User avatar

Joined: Tue May 04, 2004 8:54 am
Posts: 3331
I hope it remains outside the USA for rebuild. Sadly, CAC Mustangs have a habit of 'morphing' into P-51s for paperwork reasons once they reach the States. :(


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed Jul 20, 2011 12:45 am 
Offline

Joined: Fri Jan 28, 2011 3:03 am
Posts: 173
Mike wrote:
I hope it remains outside the USA for rebuild. Sadly, CAC Mustangs have a habit of 'morphing' into P-51s for paperwork reasons once they reach the States. :(


Other than the paperwork what is the difference in a P-51 and a CAC Mustang? Is there a physical difference?


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed Jul 20, 2011 12:58 am 
Offline
Long Time Member
Long Time Member
User avatar

Joined: Tue May 11, 2004 5:42 pm
Posts: 6884
Location: The Goldfields, Victoria, Australia
"It" will be rebuilt. It's a Mustang.

warbird2 wrote:
Other than the paperwork what is the difference in a P-51 and a CAC Mustang? Is there a physical difference?

Well, my Aussie colleagues like to suggest the CAC ones aren't rushed, wartime jobs, but better built postwar handcrafted examples... :lol:

Anyway...

Essentially the same airframe. Main modern current difference is the removal of small magnesium castings used by CAC for the original aluminium castings of NAA, after the failure of a Mag casting cause a wheels-up forced landing in Australia. I believe items like brakes and some minor systems could differ, but the licence-built CAC example had Merlin, same gun types and main equipment, as I understand.

From the warbird point of view, US built Mustangs are worth more, and easier to certify in the US, as Mike's already touched on, resulting in the well-known but generally avoided cases of identity-swapped former CAC examples - including examples with significant, important history, now dumped for a US NAA dataplate and papers.

This Mustang, the former G-HAEC, was rebuilt in Hong Kong in the 1980s from two aircraft, one a CAC example, one a NA one. How much of which depends on who you talk to. Two facts are worth bearing in mind: it was originally registered under the CAC identity, a more recent owner claimed it was more North American. These views are not arrived at randomly.

Regards,

_________________
James K

"Switch on the underwater landing lights"
Emilio Largo, Thunderball.

www.VintageAeroWriter.com


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed Jul 20, 2011 1:12 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri May 12, 2006 7:28 pm
Posts: 288
Location: Out of my mind...
Very little difference. CAC part numbers on everything - basically substitute 17- and 18- prefixes for the NAA prefixes. A lot of magnesium used for cast fittings. The Mk 23's (40 built) were fitted with Rolls Royce Merlin 70 Series engines, which have minor installation differences to the V1650-7. For all intents and purposes though, it is just a paperwork stumbling block for both the FAA and CASA, not recognising anything other than their own countries' manufactured product.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed Jul 20, 2011 2:26 am 
Offline

Joined: Fri Jan 28, 2011 3:03 am
Posts: 173
So it sounds like nothing is different that would be noticable to the average person?

Thanks for the answers gentlemen.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed Jul 20, 2011 4:36 am 
Offline

Joined: Fri Aug 04, 2006 10:20 am
Posts: 681
Location: Belgium
According a message on an another thread: the wrek was already shipped back to Germany.

_________________
Sorry for my bad English:-(


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed Jul 20, 2011 5:17 am 
Offline
Long Time Member
Long Time Member
User avatar

Joined: Sun Oct 10, 2004 4:43 pm
Posts: 7501
Location: northern ohio
it sucks that somebody had to wrangle in copyright status of the pics for such a tragedy.

_________________
tom d. friedman - hey!!! those fokkers were messerschmitts!! * without ammunition, the usaf would be just another flying club!!! * better to have piece of mind than piece of tail!!


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed Jul 20, 2011 5:23 am 
Offline
3000+ Post Club
3000+ Post Club
User avatar

Joined: Fri Apr 30, 2004 11:44 am
Posts: 3293
Location: Las Vegas, NV
vlado wrote:
I am a bit more optimistic. There are a lot of useable pieces in there. I hope it is not all scrapped...truly.
VL


There's a dataplate and a clear title in there, so certainly it's rebuildable!

_________________
ellice_island_kid wrote:
I am only in my 20s but someday I will fly it at airshows. I am getting rich really fast writing software and so I can afford to do really stupid things like put all my money into warbirds.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed Jul 20, 2011 6:36 am 
Offline
3000+ Post Club
3000+ Post Club
User avatar

Joined: Tue May 04, 2004 8:54 am
Posts: 3331
tom d. friedman wrote:
it sucks that somebody had to wrangle in copyright status of the pics for such a tragedy.


????????


Top
 Profile  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 21 posts ]  Go to page 1, 2  Next

All times are UTC - 5 hours


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Google [Bot] and 42 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  
cron
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group