Warbird Information Exchange

DISCLAIMER: The views expressed on this site are the responsibility of the poster and do not reflect the views of the management.
It is currently Mon May 05, 2025 9:34 am

All times are UTC - 5 hours


Classic Wings Magazine WWII Naval Aviation Research Pacific Luftwaffe Resource Center
When Hollywood Ruled The Skies - Volumes 1 through 4 by Bruce Oriss


Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 18 posts ]  Go to page 1, 2  Next
Author Message
PostPosted: Sat Apr 11, 2009 1:44 pm 
Offline
Co-MVP - 2006
User avatar

Joined: Sat May 01, 2004 11:21 pm
Posts: 11471
Location: Salem, Oregon
Image
F6F-5 N4964W Ontario, CA 1970

_________________
Don't touch my junk!!


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Sat Apr 11, 2009 2:12 pm 
Offline

Joined: Fri Sep 26, 2008 8:46 pm
Posts: 256
Location: midwest
is it my eyes or does that prop not look quite right?


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Sat Apr 11, 2009 4:01 pm 
Offline
3000+ Post Club
3000+ Post Club
User avatar

Joined: Mon Nov 08, 2004 10:18 pm
Posts: 3293
Location: Phoenix, Az
I was at Chino the year that flipped on landing. I remember them towing it in with the vertical fin sliced down to the fuselage, just forward of the rudder spar. Had a brake lock up on landing, went off the runway, caught the gear on a ditch and flipped over, hitting the only thing on the other side of the ditch, a plow

_________________
Matt Gunsch, A&P, IA, Warbird maint and restorations
Jack, You have Debauched my sloth !!!!!!
We tried voting with the Ballot box, When do we start voting from the Ammo box, and am I allowed only one vote ?
Check out the Ercoupe Discussion Group on facebook


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Sat Apr 11, 2009 4:04 pm 
Landing gear look strange .... Do they?


Top
  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Sat Apr 11, 2009 4:59 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Tue Dec 06, 2005 10:05 am
Posts: 972
Location: Mesa, Az
Looks OK to me.

_________________
The more I learn about aircraft, the more I realize I still have to learn.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Sat Apr 11, 2009 5:17 pm 
Offline

Joined: Thu Aug 09, 2007 6:50 pm
Posts: 378
Location: Northern VA, USA
brucev wrote:
is it my eyes or does that prop not look quite right?


It looks like the blades are rotated 180 degrees or so from where they should be (iow, cranking up the engine and advancing the throttle would end up with the aircraft moving backwards). But I can't be sure.

It also looks like the wingtip is dished in a bit. And seeing a -5 Hellcat in the tricolor scheme with the post-1947 national insignia is ... interesting.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Sat Apr 11, 2009 5:39 pm 
Offline

Joined: Thu Mar 12, 2009 6:51 am
Posts: 29
Location: Oz
no gear doors either..


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Sat Apr 11, 2009 6:03 pm 
Offline

Joined: Thu Oct 30, 2008 1:30 am
Posts: 50
Location: lakewood ca
hey jack do you have any pictures of the air museums o-47


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Sat Apr 11, 2009 6:12 pm 
Offline
3000+ Post Club
3000+ Post Club
User avatar

Joined: Mon Nov 08, 2004 10:18 pm
Posts: 3293
Location: Phoenix, Az
The prop is right, just the angle the picture is taken from.

If Jack does not have any of the O-47, I have some around here I can scan.

_________________
Matt Gunsch, A&P, IA, Warbird maint and restorations
Jack, You have Debauched my sloth !!!!!!
We tried voting with the Ballot box, When do we start voting from the Ammo box, and am I allowed only one vote ?
Check out the Ercoupe Discussion Group on facebook


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: ??
PostPosted: Sat Apr 11, 2009 6:24 pm 
Offline
Co-MVP - 2006
User avatar

Joined: Sat May 01, 2004 11:21 pm
Posts: 11471
Location: Salem, Oregon
No I don't have any of the O-47. I saw it once and thought it was a cool plane!
Is the POF planning on a restoration of theirs?? What about the one in Kansas???

_________________
Don't touch my junk!!


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Sat Apr 11, 2009 6:32 pm 
Offline
3000+ Post Club
3000+ Post Club
User avatar

Joined: Mon Nov 08, 2004 10:18 pm
Posts: 3293
Location: Phoenix, Az
Jack,
the POF first O-47 was destroyed in a post gear failure landing fire. They have a 2nd fuselage that they are combining with the remains of the first O-47 to make a flyable plane.

I will go thru my pics and dig up what I have

_________________
Matt Gunsch, A&P, IA, Warbird maint and restorations
Jack, You have Debauched my sloth !!!!!!
We tried voting with the Ballot box, When do we start voting from the Ammo box, and am I allowed only one vote ?
Check out the Ercoupe Discussion Group on facebook


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Sat Apr 11, 2009 7:08 pm 
Offline
3000+ Post Club
3000+ Post Club
User avatar

Joined: Mon Nov 08, 2004 10:18 pm
Posts: 3293
Location: Phoenix, Az
Here is all I have, this goes back to 126 instamatic days,

Image
Image
Image
Image

Here is the accident report
http://www.ntsb.gov/ntsb/GenPDF.asp?id= ... 216&rpt=fi

_________________
Matt Gunsch, A&P, IA, Warbird maint and restorations
Jack, You have Debauched my sloth !!!!!!
We tried voting with the Ballot box, When do we start voting from the Ammo box, and am I allowed only one vote ?
Check out the Ercoupe Discussion Group on facebook


Last edited by Matt Gunsch on Sat Apr 11, 2009 8:19 pm, edited 1 time in total.

Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Sat Apr 11, 2009 8:03 pm 
Offline

Joined: Thu Oct 30, 2008 1:30 am
Posts: 50
Location: lakewood ca
thanks cool pictures!

they have been restoring the o-47 at the air museum its just been a long
process but its coming along very slow. they dug the wings out one from the first o-47 that crashed and the second one but there both the same wing I believe.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Sat Apr 11, 2009 11:17 pm 
Offline

Joined: Mon Jan 19, 2009 5:20 pm
Posts: 13
Location: usa
I think the landing gear looks short cause maybe it's fully loaded with petrol as the oleos are tight.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sun Apr 12, 2009 12:01 am 
Offline
Been here a long time
Been here a long time

Joined: Sun May 02, 2004 1:16 am
Posts: 11319
Jack Cook wrote:
F6F-5 N4964W Ontario, CA 1970
I suspect not. I don't think that airframe was complete at the time, only a fuselage. I would love to be proven wrong however. Are you sure that isn't N4994V?


Top
 Profile  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 18 posts ]  Go to page 1, 2  Next

All times are UTC - 5 hours


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Google [Bot], Google Adsense [Bot], rcaf_100 and 310 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group