Warbird Information Exchange

DISCLAIMER: The views expressed on this site are the responsibility of the poster and do not reflect the views of the management.
It is currently Sun Aug 24, 2025 3:22 am

All times are UTC - 5 hours


Classic Wings Magazine WWII Naval Aviation Research Pacific Luftwaffe Resource Center
When Hollywood Ruled The Skies - Volumes 1 through 4 by Bruce Oriss


Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 30 posts ]  Go to page 1, 2  Next
Author Message
PostPosted: Wed Jan 07, 2009 2:39 pm 
Offline
2000+ Post Club
2000+ Post Club
User avatar

Joined: Fri Apr 30, 2004 7:34 pm
Posts: 2933
Quote:
Jones Day Announces F-14 Seizure in Chino Resolved


Last update: 12:40 p.m. EST Jan. 7, 2009
IRVINE, Calif., Jan 07, 2009 (BUSINESS WIRE) -- Yanks Air Museum and the United States Government have resolved their differences related to two F-14 Tomcat fighter aircraft that Yanks claimed it had previously purchased. The US Government seized the aircraft in 2007, contending that the aircraft were not properly sold to Yanks, and otherwise raised national security concerns. The US Government has increased its scrutiny of such aircraft in recent years.
"Yanks is very pleased with the settlement," stated its lawyer, Paul Rafferty, from Jones Day. "Although initially the Government and Yanks did not see eye to eye on this issue, both parties worked cooperatively for months to find a solution that made sense. Yanks has done its part to ensure the national security of this great country, and in the process, improved its relationship with the Government and Department of the Navy."
Yanks' founder, Charles Nichols, was equally pleased. "We were obviously quite bothered by the Government's initial handling of the matter, but I must say, we really met some good folks within the US Government that do their best to protect the citizens of this country, and we especially thank the folks at the Navy Detachment at the Aerospace Maintenance and Regeneration Group (AMARG) for their cooperation and hospitality."
The settlement will provide Yanks with additional opportunities to create new, as well as expand and complete existing displays of historic Naval aircraft through participation in the Navy's prestigious Museum Loan Program, and other valuable consideration. In exchange, Yanks will waive further claim to the two F-14 aircraft of interest.
"We are pleased to resolve this lawsuit in a cooperative manner with Yanks," stated Ann Wolf, the Government's counsel. "It is nice to see a result where the interests of the people of the United States are served, and at the same time, a reputable museum such as Yanks is made whole in the process."
As was reported by the LA Times, and various news channels, on March 6, 2007, the US Government formally seized the F-14 aircraft at Yanks' facility in Chino, California. Yanks, a war bird museum well known in the United States with over 160 vintage and retired aircraft, had claimed that it purchased the subject aircraft in 1999 from a salvage company that had obtained the planes from Pt. Mugu Naval Air Base in California. The Government later concluded that the sale was not proper, and initiated a forfeiture action to recover the aircraft. Following a 12 month cooperative effort to resolve their differences, Yanks and the Government settled.

From here:
http://www.marketwatch.com/news/story/j ... dist=msr_5


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Wed Jan 07, 2009 3:01 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sat Jul 12, 2008 2:02 pm
Posts: 411
Location: Minden, NV
Interesting that they aren't getting the F-14's back. I wonder what they got in the trade? Anybody have any knowledge or guesses as to what aircraft they will get?

Les


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Wed Jan 07, 2009 3:06 pm 
Offline
3000+ Post Club
3000+ Post Club

Joined: Fri Jun 24, 2005 7:26 pm
Posts: 4974
Location: PA
This should have never happened in the first place! :roll: :x

Quote:
Yanks has done its part to ensure the national security of this great country, and in the process, improved its relationship with the Government and Department of the Navy."
:bs: :bs:

I can't see Yanks ever being a "threat" to the United States. The way they put it it seem thats what they thought. Air museums are a patriotic group. I think its a disgrace how some people and organizations in the warbird movement are treated. But such is life I suppose. Im glad our gov'ment is making sure we are safe from possible future threats from Yanks Air museum. :roll:

Whow....sorry for the rant. This hit me the wrong way as I am sure it will others.

Cheers,
Nathan

_________________
Shop the Airplane Bunker At
www.warbirdbunker.com


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Wed Jan 07, 2009 3:27 pm 
Offline
2000+ Post Club
2000+ Post Club
User avatar

Joined: Wed Dec 15, 2004 1:08 pm
Posts: 2993
Location: Bunker Hill, WV
I wonder just what the Gubmint offered. Was it a "Take it or leave it."? I hope Yanks got equal value for their investment in those "wicked" F-14s.
Like Gen "Chappy" used to say, "What good's a little power if you can't abuse it?"

Mudge the cynic :roll:

I think I can hear those black helicopters coming towards me now....:hide:

_________________
Land of the free because of the brave


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Wed Jan 07, 2009 3:35 pm 
Offline
2000+ Post Club
2000+ Post Club

Joined: Fri Sep 21, 2007 6:25 pm
Posts: 2760
Nathan wrote:
This should have never happened in the first place! :roll: :x

Quote:
Yanks has done its part to ensure the national security of this great country, and in the process, improved its relationship with the Government and Department of the Navy."
:bs: :bs:

I can't see Yanks ever being a "threat" to the United States. The way they put it it seem thats what they thought. Air museums are a patriotic group. I think its a disgrace how some people and organizations in the warbird movement are treated. But such is life I suppose. Im glad our gov'ment is making sure we are safe from possible future threats from Yanks Air museum. :roll:

Whow....sorry for the rant. This hit me the wrong way as I am sure it will others.

Cheers,
Nathan


It wasn't so much that the Navy thought that Yanks was a threat, but it was just about control. This all came about as a result of the increased tensions with Iran in the last few years. The Government was worried about F-14 parts making it over illegally to the Middle East to help support the Iranian Air Force. The Government wanted a total clamp down on the control of F-14 parts. So, the only way to obtain complete control, is to obtain all of the civilian owned F-14 airframes. Even though I see their perspective, I did think it was a bit silly and over-reactive of the Government to seize all of the F-14's.

As a side note, I also wonder which aircraft that Yanks will receive. Seeing as how the Navy has an excess of Wildcat's and SBD's, both aircraft of which Yanks already has, I wonder what they will send to them?

Also, what is the outcome of the Navy's F-14 seizure from the POF? Has that been resolved yet or not?


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Wed Jan 07, 2009 3:47 pm 
Offline
3000+ Post Club
3000+ Post Club
User avatar

Joined: Thu May 18, 2006 3:08 pm
Posts: 4542
Location: chicago
Maybe they should get an airworthy Privateer out of the deal. :lol: Or a few of the aircraft in long term underwater storage. :lol:

_________________
.
.
Sure, Charles Lindbergh flew the plane... but Tom Rutledge built the engine!

Visit Django Studios online or Facebook!


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: What a mood
PostPosted: Wed Jan 07, 2009 4:06 pm 
Offline
1000+ Posts!
1000+ Posts!

Joined: Thu May 27, 2004 8:06 pm
Posts: 1663
Location: Baltimore MD
Sorry, but this came to mind when I read this:

Quote:
The right of the people to be secure in their persons, houses, papers, and effects, against unreasonable searches and seizures, shall not be violated, and no Warrants shall issue, but upon probable cause, supported by Oath or affirmation, and particularly describing the place to be searched, and the persons or things to be seized.


What probable cause did the G have for thinking that the aircraft would be used for terrorist acts? Last time I checked, the museum wasn't on the terrorist watch list....

_________________
REMEMBER THE SERGEANT PILOTS!


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Wed Jan 07, 2009 4:09 pm 
Offline

Joined: Tue Aug 16, 2005 1:43 pm
Posts: 234
Location: KABE
FYI-

The concern is not the F-14 airframe per se but F-14 parts, there have been a number of rather high profile cases that involved illegal efforts to export F-14 parts to Iran.

Tom-


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Wed Jan 07, 2009 4:19 pm 
Offline
2000+ Post Club
2000+ Post Club

Joined: Tue Jun 14, 2005 10:16 am
Posts: 2309
Does this mean we can now buy tires for Tigercats (same as the F14) instead of then being cut into little pieces?

_________________
Those who possess real knowledge are rare.

Those who can set that knowledge into motion in the physical world are rarer still.

The few who possess real knowledge and can set it into motion of their own hands are the rarest of all.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Wed Jan 07, 2009 4:47 pm 
Offline
3000+ Post Club
3000+ Post Club

Joined: Fri Jun 24, 2005 7:26 pm
Posts: 4974
Location: PA
I kinda hope Iran can get some F-14 parts. That way there will still be some F-14s flying today! :lol: :idea:

I miss seeing an F-14 fly! Why cant the Navy keep a few airworthy for Heritage flights? :? :x

Of course to just rid of the entire problem just dump em' in the ocean. :roll: :wink: :idea:


:hide:

_________________
Shop the Airplane Bunker At
www.warbirdbunker.com


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Wed Jan 07, 2009 5:50 pm 
Offline
3000+ Post Club
3000+ Post Club
User avatar

Joined: Thu May 18, 2006 3:08 pm
Posts: 4542
Location: chicago
Nathan wrote:
I kinda hope Iran can get some F-14 parts. That way there will still be some F-14s flying today! :lol: :idea:


:hide:


Uh... they probably wouldn't be flying for long. :shock:

_________________
.
.
Sure, Charles Lindbergh flew the plane... but Tom Rutledge built the engine!

Visit Django Studios online or Facebook!


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: F-14s
PostPosted: Wed Jan 07, 2009 6:00 pm 
Offline
1000+ Posts!
1000+ Posts!
User avatar

Joined: Sat Oct 07, 2006 9:24 pm
Posts: 1748
Location: atlanta,georgia
GUBMINT=UTTER SILLYNESS.

_________________
Hang The Expense


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Wed Jan 07, 2009 6:28 pm 
Offline
3000+ Post Club
3000+ Post Club
User avatar

Joined: Thu Mar 24, 2005 10:10 pm
Posts: 4173
Location: Pearland, Texas
The only thing settled is that Yanks got screwed and both parties were able to publish a feelgood press release !

The prestigious Naval Loan Program ? Please,...they'll loan you an airplane that you'll never hold title to, can never fly, but will be able to underwrite the demil,movement and restoration... give me a break !

_________________
"You cannot invade the mainland United States. There would be a rifle behind each blade of grass..."
Admiral Isoruku Yamamoto


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Wed Jan 07, 2009 6:49 pm 
Offline
Been here a long time
Been here a long time

Joined: Sun May 02, 2004 1:16 am
Posts: 11330
warbird1 wrote:
Also, what is the outcome of the Navy's F-14 seizure from the POF? Has that been resolved yet or not?
I have been told on good authority that is has (some time ago), but cannot offer details.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Wed Jan 07, 2009 7:23 pm 
Offline
2000+ Post Club
2000+ Post Club

Joined: Fri Sep 21, 2007 6:25 pm
Posts: 2760
bdk wrote:
warbird1 wrote:
Also, what is the outcome of the Navy's F-14 seizure from the POF? Has that been resolved yet or not?
I have been told on good authority that is has (some time ago), but cannot offer details.


Why, are the details secret, or you just don't know?


Top
 Profile  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 30 posts ]  Go to page 1, 2  Next

All times are UTC - 5 hours


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 21 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group