Warbird Information Exchange

DISCLAIMER: The views expressed on this site are the responsibility of the poster and do not reflect the views of the management.
It is currently Sat May 02, 2026 9:08 pm

All times are UTC - 5 hours


Classic Wings Magazine WWII Naval Aviation Research Pacific Luftwaffe Resource Center
When Hollywood Ruled The Skies - Volumes 1 through 4 by Bruce Oriss


Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 33 posts ]  Go to page 1, 2, 3  Next
Author Message
 Post subject: Merlin/Griffon Question
PostPosted: Mon Mar 03, 2008 1:30 pm 
Offline
Probationary Member

Joined: Wed Jun 21, 2006 7:53 pm
Posts: 3803
Location: Aspen, CO
It is often alleged that the Spitfire prop turns the reverse of US planes. Of course, this is not true for the Merlin Spit or Hurri which turns clockwise as seen from the pilot view. The Griffon is opposite. Does anyone have any figures on how many Spits were built with Merlins vs Griffons? What were the production numbers?

_________________
Bill Greenwood
Spitfire N308WK


Last edited by Bill Greenwood on Tue Mar 04, 2008 5:09 pm, edited 2 times in total.

Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Mar 03, 2008 3:29 pm 
Offline

Joined: Fri Oct 07, 2005 9:41 am
Posts: 540
Some of the Merlins turned opposite, didn't they? Of course the Griffons with c/r props had it both ways..........

Bill Greenwood wrote:
It is often alleged that the Spitfire prop turns the reverse of US planes. Of course, this is not true for the Merlin which in a Spit or Hurri turns clockwise as seen from the pilot view. The Griffin is opposite. Does anyone have any figures on how many Spits were built with Merlins vs Griffins?


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Mon Mar 03, 2008 3:41 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Jun 14, 2007 9:10 am
Posts: 869
Location: Littleton,Colorado
I didn't know of any Spits with Counter-rotating propellers.
I had only heard of the Griffons with the contra-rotating props.
But after looking around a bit I found this.
Quote:
that the contra-rotating griffin arrangement was developed for the carrier version of the Spitfire.
The torque reaction from single rotation Prop would turn the plane to the right.
If a pilot applied full throttle to go round again after abandoning a landing, he would find himself flying into the flight deck island,
so a contra-rotating prop was essential for naval flying.

http://www.airliners.net/discussions/tech_ops/read.main/101968/
I always thought it was about greater engine power, not a torque issue.
Is this true?

_________________
Live the Good Life
Bluedharma
http://flickr.com/photos/bluedharma/
http://www.airport-data.com/photographe ... arma;1045/
bluedharmawix@gmail.com
Image


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Mon Mar 03, 2008 3:54 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sat Feb 10, 2007 2:24 pm
Posts: 819
Location: San Angelo, Texas
Notes on the Griffon:

http://www.unlimitedexcitement.com/Grif ... escription

Once again, it's not torque (roll axis) that pulls to the left (or right) (yaw axis)...it's a thing called "P-factor", as per below (among many other sources):

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/P-factor

_________________
Bob


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Mon Mar 03, 2008 4:06 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Jun 14, 2007 9:10 am
Posts: 869
Location: Littleton,Colorado
Old SAR pilot wrote:
Notes on the Griffon:
Once again, it's not torque (roll axis) that pulls to the left (or right) (yaw axis)...it's a thing called "P-factor", as per below (among many other sources):

Old SAR pilot,
Thanks for clearing that up for me.
Was the change to c/r because of the P-factor on flight decks?

Best Regards,

_________________
Live the Good Life
Bluedharma
http://flickr.com/photos/bluedharma/
http://www.airport-data.com/photographe ... arma;1045/
bluedharmawix@gmail.com
Image


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Mon Mar 03, 2008 4:15 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sun Oct 29, 2006 7:43 pm
Posts: 331
Location: Ottawa
It was my undertsanding that from the MkXII on Spits had the Griffon with the exception of the MXVI it had the Packard Merlin 266.
Any experts out there?

_________________
“Try to fly in the middle of the air. The edges are filled with mountains and oceans and rocks and it’s much harder to fly there.”


Last edited by K225 on Tue Mar 04, 2008 7:27 am, edited 1 time in total.

Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Mar 03, 2008 4:25 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Apr 14, 2005 11:19 am
Posts: 800
Location: Vancouver BC
A handy breakdown of Spitfire/Seafire types with basic details here:

http://www.spitfiresociety.demon.co.uk/whatmark.htm

famvburg wrote:
Some of the Merlins turned opposite, didn't they? Of course the Griffons with c/r props had it both ways..........


I think it was just the Merlins as installed in the DH Hornet that had counter-rotating props; I wonder if this was handled in the reduction gearing or if it was the entire engine that rotated in reverse (like the Allisons in the P-38?)?

cheers

greg v.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Mon Mar 03, 2008 4:25 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sat Feb 10, 2007 2:24 pm
Posts: 819
Location: San Angelo, Texas
Bluedharma wrote:
Quote:
Was the change to c/r because of the P-factor on flight decks?


That, I couldn't say. However, in a quick search, it is noted in the following site that the Griffon was originally designed to run in a counter-clockwise fashion, but was changed in 1940:
http://www.spitfiresociety.demon.co.uk/engines.htm

Also, for Spit affecitionadoes, the following site (which you may have seen) has a bit on info on the various types:

http://www.battleofbritain.net/0011.html

_________________
Bob


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Mon Mar 03, 2008 10:18 pm 
Offline

Joined: Thu Jan 12, 2006 1:42 pm
Posts: 460
Location: Nevada
I thought the one of the Merlins on the P-82 turned the wrong way, or am I the wrong way? :rolleyes:


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Mar 04, 2008 2:30 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Nov 24, 2004 2:20 pm
Posts: 368
Location: UK
gregv wrote:
I think it was just the Merlins as installed in the DH Hornet that had counter-rotating props; I wonder if this was handled in the reduction gearing or if it was the entire engine that rotated in reverse (like the Allisons in the P-38?)?

cheers

greg v.


It was in the reduction gear. RR made complete opposite hand engines for the Peregrine in the Westland Whirlwind and decided it was too much trouble.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Tue Mar 04, 2008 7:56 am 
Offline
Long Time Member
Long Time Member
User avatar

Joined: Tue May 11, 2004 5:42 pm
Posts: 6884
Location: The Goldfields, Victoria, Australia
What was the question again? :rolleyes:
Old SAR pilot wrote:
Once again, it's not torque (roll axis) that pulls to the left (or right) (yaw axis)...it's a thing called "P-factor",

But a contraprop addresses that issue as well, surely?

Just for clarity (ha ha) in British English, as we are discussing a British design, it's usual to refer to 'handed' propellers on a twin engine aircraft with a single row prop turning (inwards or outwards) in opposing rotation. A 'contraprop' is a two row set of two propellers on a single engine rotating in opposite directions. 'Counter-rotating' isn't a common use (I think) in Commonwealth accounts.

The contraprop on the Griffon-powered Seafires I vaguely recall was to avoid the effects of torque (not correctly referred to as p-factor at the time, although I take Old SAR pilot's point) but also as a means to transmit the thrust through a reasonably sized prop disc - hence two sets of three blades.

Cheers

_________________
James K

"Switch on the underwater landing lights"
Emilio Largo, Thunderball.

www.VintageAeroWriter.com


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: no.s
PostPosted: Tue Mar 04, 2008 12:25 pm 
Offline
Probationary Member

Joined: Wed Jun 21, 2006 7:53 pm
Posts: 3803
Location: Aspen, CO
Everybody is focusing on the variations. What I was hoping was somebody might have production numbers or at least a close estimate of how many Spitfires were built with Merlins and how many with Griffons? All the Merlin Spits turn the same way as US planes, thus the column in AOPA is mostly incorrect when it talks about turning the opposite.

_________________
Bill Greenwood
Spitfire N308WK


Last edited by Bill Greenwood on Tue Mar 04, 2008 5:10 pm, edited 1 time in total.

Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Merlin numbers.
PostPosted: Tue Mar 04, 2008 12:42 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Jun 14, 2007 9:10 am
Posts: 869
Location: Littleton,Colorado
I guess I wasn't sure Bill. That was why I asked about the contraprop.

This site has approximate figures for Merlin Variants...
http://www.spitfireart.com/merlin_engines.html

Best Regards,

_________________
Live the Good Life
Bluedharma
http://flickr.com/photos/bluedharma/
http://www.airport-data.com/photographe ... arma;1045/
bluedharmawix@gmail.com
Image


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: no.s
PostPosted: Tue Mar 04, 2008 1:48 pm 
Offline

Joined: Tue Mar 04, 2008 12:42 pm
Posts: 213
Location: Fort Worth, TX
Bill Greenwood wrote:
Everybody is focusing on the variations. What I was hoping was somebody might have production numbers or at least a close estimate of how many Spitfires were built with Merlins and how many with Griffins? All the Merlin Spits turn the same way as US planes, thus the column in AOPA is mostly incorrect when it talks about turning the opposite.


Bill-

According to "The British Fighter" Francis Mason, there were 1,836 examples of the Mk XII thru Mk 24 Griffon powered Spitfires made.

BTW the P-82 was powered by 'two' different power plants... the XP-82/P-82B used Merlin V-1650-19/21 (1860 HP), the P-82E/F/G used Allison V-1710-143/145 (1600 HP).

gunny

_________________
Scott 'Gunny' Perdue
www.scottperdue.com


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Tue Mar 04, 2008 3:48 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sat Feb 10, 2007 2:24 pm
Posts: 819
Location: San Angelo, Texas
Bill,

The following site has numbers - scroll down onnit...

http://www.battleofbritain.net/0011.html

_________________
Bob


Top
 Profile  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 33 posts ]  Go to page 1, 2, 3  Next

All times are UTC - 5 hours


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 166 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group