Warbird Information Exchange

Yes they do seem to dangle quite a bit, only thing I can think of is as the weight is off them in flight gravity takes them to the fullest extension and as a training aircraft it looks like it would need a lot of travel to flatter the trainees landing attempts

The front lower fairing was removed.

_________________
45-47=-2

Thanks for the responses. The removal of the trouser section is clear on a bigger screen and may indeed relate to the training role.
It is easy to envisage hard landings causing issues with clearance etc with bad outcomes.
In Europe where grass fields were used more spats/trousers were removed to simplify maintenance and to stop grass and mud build up. Am I correct that in the US most military training was on hard fields where this would not be such an issue?

_________________
Chris Mellor

Yes, most American military training was done on hard fields.

However, there are examples of U.S. aircraft being operated without gear fairings to simplify maintenance.
The few extra kts of speed they might deliver is irrelevant in training whereas ease of maintenance is important.

_________________
Remember the vets, the wonderful planes they flew and their sacrifices for a future many of them did not live to see.
Note political free signature.
I figure if you wanted my opinion on items unrelated to this forum, you'd ask for it.